TFRs and ADIZ: The Final Solution

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:09dJc.78376$%_6.15146@attbi_s01...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news4aJc.75462$MB3.32162@attbi_s04...
"C J Campbell" wrote in
message
...
Moore does get interviews with rabid Bush-hater Tom Daschle and
Saddam
sympathizer Jim McDermott. The only reason McDermott has not been
charged
with treason is that he is a Congressman.

Visiting CJ's world is a fascinating escapist diversion.

As opposed to Gary Drescher's world where the real reason for the
terrorist
attacks on the US and the subsequent invasion of Iraq was an enormous
Arab-Bush-al Qaeda conspiracy to destroy the World Trade Center as a
pretext
for seizing control of a non-existent pipeline so that Cheney could get
the
contract for his old friends at Halliburton. Seems like there might have
been an easier way to make money, but whatever.

Gary's world has Bush conspiring with Osama bin Laden to destroy the
World
Trade Center but alleges that bin Laden knew nothing about the attack.

Well, Mr. Pot, still wanting to call the kettle black.

What you describe as my world is indeed every bit as outlandish as your
world.

The problem with your comparison, though, is that what I refer to as "your
world" consists of things you actually say (e.g. that Rep. McDermott
committed treason), whereas the views you attribute to me resemble nothing
I've ever said.

Really? Weren't you the one defending Moore's movie? Or do you now deny it?

The truth bites, doesn't it? Sorry, if you think Fahrenheit 9/11 has
anything important to say, then what I said about your fantasies is spot on.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:09dJc.78376$%_6.15146@attbi_s01...
What you describe as my world is indeed every bit as outlandish as your
world.

The problem with your comparison, though, is that what I refer to as
"your
world" consists of things you actually say (e.g. that Rep. McDermott
committed treason), whereas the views you attribute to me resemble
nothing
I've ever said.

Really? Weren't you the one defending Moore's movie? Or do you now deny
it?

Since you ask, I will say now that Moore's movie has many worthwhile aspects
and should be seen.

However, no, I did not previously endorse Moore's film here. If you think
otherwise, please cite a quote.

The closest you'll find is that I mentioned that a Fox News reviewer spoke
favorably of Fahrenheit 9/11. But I had not yet seen the film myself, so I
expressed no opinion agreeing or disagreeing with the reviewer.

The truth bites, doesn't it? Sorry, if you think Fahrenheit 9/11 has
anything important to say, then what I said about your fantasies is spot
on.

Because I mentioned a favorable Fox News review of Moore's film, you feel
entitled to attribute to me the entirety of what you believe are the film's
views (which, of course, you have also bizarrely mischaracterized).

Seeing the steps by which you construct your world-view makes it much less
mysterious that the final product turns out as it does.

--Gary