![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The tanks are 41 gallons, so allow for 240 lbs useable fuel,
which would give you a total load of about 890 lbs. Those are some pretty poor numbers for a new, 4-place design. This airplane would not meet my regular travel needs, i.e. IFR trips between Mobile and Houston. On most trips, at least west bound, I'd need to make a fuel stop. It is pretty short range; about 600 nm with reserves. I think of the airplane as having the payload of a 172 with the speed and roominess of a 182. They do offer extended range tanks that hold 53 gallons. I happened to get a ride in a DA-40 yesterday as well, no G1000, and nothing as thorough as CJ, but it did give me an idea about performance, which I was curious about We had two 200lb adults and 36 gallons on board. At sea level, ~75F, the Star climbed out at 800-900fpm and cruised about 125 indicated at 2000' at 23/2400, so about 130TAS there, making the qouted 140K at altitude believeable. The fuel flow was just a little over 9gph at that setting. Acceleration on takeoff was very good thanks to the CS prop. Great numbers, although to be completely honest, primed by marketing enthusiasm, I expected just a bit more. Alas, composites or not, given a certain HP loading, I suppose there is no free lunch, only little better deals. But, I think they have found a nice market niche, these will make popular IFR trainers and FBO rental planes. For private owners, its a great option, but not completely clear cut, other factors come into play. (This is not a plane I'd want to land on a narrow dirt runway with tall brush on either side, for example.) I don't think its an automatic Cessna killer (not even a 172SP, and certainly not a 182), but it will give the lower-end 180hp fleet run for their money, especially the low-wing Archer and Tiger, neither of which has a CS prop (a bigger detriment than dated spam-can construction, IMHO). Overall, a very nice cruiser, loading-wise short of a 182 (d'oh), but well above a 172. The performance is very similar to my 177B, although the Star will walk away from it at altitude by up to 10 knots. (I do agree that 41 gallons is not enough for the O-360 mill, I suspect the larger tanks will be a popular option). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna 182T w. G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 63 | July 22nd 04 07:06 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
PIREP WANTED: Airmap 1000 | [email protected] | Piloting | 2 | June 5th 04 03:51 AM |
GPSMAP 195/196 vs. Lowrance AIPMAP 1000 | JJS | Piloting | 4 | March 9th 04 08:14 PM |