A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 21st 04, 01:45 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Russell Kent wrote:

It may be slower, but it doesn't "ring true" to me that the cause is

higher
cooling drag. Diesel engines are more efficient than gasoline engines
because they extract more of the chemical energy as useful work, and

less
chemical energy is converted to waste heat. With less waste heat, their
cooling drag should be *less* than a gasoline engine's.


Well, they don't. They have a higher compression ratio, and that produces

heat. The
SMA diesel is air-cooled, it produces more waste heat than an IO-540, and

there's
more cooling drag than with an IO-540.

Aren't they also heavier, i.e., pound of engine weight per HP generated?


  #2  
Old July 21st 04, 02:35 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tom Sixkiller wrote:

Aren't they also heavier, i.e., pound of engine weight per HP generated?


Every one of which I've read is heavier than an equivalent gas engine, especially
with all the accessories installed. Since some of the new diesel designs are
2-stroke, and most gas engines are 4-stroke, though, some of the newer ones may
actually come in lighter than the equivalent gasoline engine (if they ever make it to
production).

George Patterson
In Idaho, tossing a rattlesnake into a crowded room is felony assault.
In Tennessee, it's evangelism.
  #3  
Old July 21st 04, 02:45 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

G.R. Patterson III wrote:

Aren't they also heavier, i.e., pound of engine weight per HP generated?


Every one of which I've read is heavier than an equivalent gas engine, especially
with all the accessories installed. Since some of the new diesel designs are
2-stroke, and most gas engines are 4-stroke, though, some of the newer ones may
actually come in lighter than the equivalent gasoline engine (if they ever make it to
production).


Help me out here.

Why "especially with all the accessories installed"?

Why is a 2-stroke cycle engine lighter than a 4-stroke?

Thanks.

Dave

  #4  
Old July 21st 04, 03:04 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dave Butler wrote:

Why "especially with all the accessories installed"?


The injection system tends to be more complex and heavier than gasoline models or
carburettors. This is because the injectors spray fuel directly into the cylinder
rather than into a section of the intake manifold. Many diesels handle the higher
CHTs by using water cooling systems, and those add weight (Lycoming was working on
one of these a few years ago). On the other hand, the glow plug systems used for
starting tend to be lighter than the magnetos used in gas engines.

The main cause of the weight difference is still the fact that everything must be
beefed up to handle the higher compression, though.

Why is a 2-stroke cycle engine lighter than a 4-stroke?


There are twice as many power pulses per minute with a 2-stroke. They usually are not
as efficient as a 4-stroke, so you don't get twice as much power, but they will
easily produce 1.6 times the power of a 4-stroke the same size, and most do better
than that. So a 200hp 2-stroke engine is smaller than a 200hp 4-stroke engine. In
addition, 2-strokes don't have a valve train, which saves some weight.

George Patterson
In Idaho, tossing a rattlesnake into a crowded room is felony assault.
In Tennessee, it's evangelism.
  #5  
Old July 21st 04, 04:19 PM
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why "especially with all the accessories installed"?

-heavier high-pressure fuel pumps, lines etc which are not needed on gas
engines.
-on two strokes you need a supercharger to get them started.

Why is a 2-stroke cycle engine lighter than a 4-stroke?

-less stuff: with twice the power strokes per piston, one needs fewer
pistons and all associated stuff. For example the three cylinder Wilksch is
as smooth as a six cyl gas engine http://www.wilksch.com/

If only they could be lighter :-)

Cheers & blue skies,

Pete

Europa Builder A239 dual-wing

http://europa.zutrasoft.com



"Dave Butler" wrote in message
...
G.R. Patterson III wrote:

Aren't they also heavier, i.e., pound of engine weight per HP generated?


Every one of which I've read is heavier than an equivalent gas engine,

especially
with all the accessories installed. Since some of the new diesel designs

are
2-stroke, and most gas engines are 4-stroke, though, some of the newer

ones may
actually come in lighter than the equivalent gasoline engine (if they

ever make it to
production).


Help me out here.

Why "especially with all the accessories installed"?

Why is a 2-stroke cycle engine lighter than a 4-stroke?

Thanks.

Dave



  #6  
Old July 21st 04, 04:17 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

G.R.,

. Since some of the new diesel designs are
2-stroke, and most gas engines are 4-stroke,


None of those certified or close to certification are 2-stroke. And all
the Thielert engines are very close to the Avgas engines they replace,
weightwise.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cessna 182T w. G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 63 July 22nd 04 07:06 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Owning 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
PIREP WANTED: Airmap 1000 [email protected] Piloting 2 June 5th 04 03:51 AM
GPSMAP 195/196 vs. Lowrance AIPMAP 1000 JJS Piloting 4 March 9th 04 08:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.