![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You gotta have control power sufficient to deal with the instability, plus
some for maneuvering. The M2-F2 ($6M Man) didn't have it. Fly-by-wire would have done nothing for it; it was just a bad design. The M2-F3 (big center vertical fin) flew much better due to adequate open-loop roll damping and directional stability. That crew return vehicle concept (X-38??) that was/is in the works was basicallly a lifting body design. But that one used a steerable parachute for final approach and landing. Not a bad trade, actually, when you consider the weight cost of something like a deployable control/lift device. This way, the shape can be optimized for controlled re-entry and initial descent. Pete "Doc Font" wrote in message ... So is it feasable at this time considering the advancements in computer controls? Like the F-117 or F-16 are unstable without their computer systems but they work because the computer constantly adjusts the flight. Could they build an easy to fly lifting body now? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |