A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Squawk Sheets



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 04, 12:20 PM
tscottme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Greg Esres" wrote in message
...
I'm curious as to the legal status of the squawk sheets for airplanes
at flight schools or FBOs. There has been some discussion as to who
is "legal" to sign off on a return to service after a renter has
written a squawk. Some mechanics say instructors can do so.

My suspicion is that squawk sheets have no legal standing at all, and
any pilot can choose to fly a squawked airplane if he believes it
legal and safe to fly.

Anyone have information regarding this?


When I was working as an A&P for a flight school, that school gained Part
141 certification. Our squawk book was one item the FAA examined. They
made us change from using a three-ring binder, where anyone could remove a
page with squawks, to a record that would show if an item had been removed.
I can't tell you if this is something peculiar to the Ft Lauderdale FSDO,
Part 141 schools, or a matter of bureaucrat's preference.

The FAA wanted us to have all customer/student write-ups entered in some
sort of official record rather than the customary scrap of paper thrown at
the A&P. Once the squawk was made our FAA guy wanted some sort of
evaluation by company employee noted. For example a CFI or I should note in
the record if the squawk couldn't be duplicated, was due to customer
misunderstanding or incorrect operation, or if item was scheduled for
maintenance and any limitations to be observed. This seems more like a Part
141 or sacrifice to the FSDO idol than regulatory requirement.

--
Scott


  #2  
Old August 20th 04, 03:00 AM
Greg Esres
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This seems more like a Part 141 or sacrifice to the FSDO idol than
regulatory requirement.

That makes more sense to me. I think that Part 141 does have some
requirements that apply to this.

Thanks
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Air Show "Promotional" Sheets J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 December 20th 04 06:24 AM
FS: Air Show "Promotional" Sheets J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 November 6th 04 05:58 AM
FS: Air Show "Promotional" Sheets J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 August 26th 04 05:11 AM
FS: Air Show "Promotional" Sheets J.R. Sinclair Aviation Marketplace 0 June 13th 04 08:31 AM
"Squawk standby" Roy Smith General Aviation 9 March 23rd 04 05:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.