is it just me?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

In the US, controllers would sequence the arriving aircraft so that a go
around would not be necessary.

Not always. I had the plane in front of me fail to clear the runway in time at TTN
once.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

In the US, controllers would sequence the arriving aircraft so that a go
around would not be necessary.

Not always. I had the plane in front of me fail to clear the runway in
time at TTN
once.


That doesn't mean there wasn't sufficient spacing.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

That doesn't mean there wasn't sufficient spacing.

I could well believe that there was sufficient spacing when the plane ahead of me was
still a mile away from touchdown. There was not when I crossed the threshold.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

That doesn't mean there wasn't sufficient spacing.

I could well believe that there was sufficient spacing when the plane
ahead of me was
still a mile away from touchdown. There was not when I crossed the
threshold.


How do you know?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

How do you know?

The controller told me so.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...

The controller told me so.


Did you not have the previous airplane in sight?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...

The controller told me so.


Did you not have the previous airplane in sight?

Og course. He was trundling down the runway.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.

G.R. Patterson III wrote:



"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

How do you know?

The controller told me so.

In the US on Earth, the controller has to make certain assumptions. That #1
won't blow a tire is one of those assumptions, of course. Others include
that #1 won't slow a lot on final or dally on the runway.

And just to make matters "worse", I've been cleared as #3 or #4 to land. So
the controller is making a fairly lengthy chain of assumptions (even on
small planes, we're speaking now of 9 tires holding together {8^).

- Andrew

Andrew Gideon wrote:




In the US on Earth, the controller has to make certain assumptions.

We make thousands of assumptions everyday.



That #1
won't blow a tire is one of those assumptions, of course.

In the 16 or so years I've been doing this I've seen less than 5 blown
tires that required the aircraft to get towed off the runway. In that
time I have witnessed well over a million takeoffs and landings.


Others include
that #1 won't slow a lot on final or dally on the runway.

That happens all the time. There is no such thing as a go around proof
sequence. **** happens. If it didn't there wouldn't be any need for a
controller in the first place.



And just to make matters "worse", I've been cleared as #3 or #4 to land. So
the controller is making a fairly lengthy chain of assumptions (even on
small planes, we're speaking now of 9 tires holding together {8^).

What exactly are the tires you use made of...Jello? They just don't
fail with the regularity that you are worried about.