Run In With Mr. Edwards

In article svqWc.45638$Fg5.43388@attbi_s53,
Jay Honeck wrote:
Keep in mind that this is the same guy who was saying that nothing's
changed since
9/11 a couple weeks ago.

Nothing of any importance HAS changed, for 99.99% of the people.

And I was responding to Eduardo's broadside about how the "new American
lifestyle sucks" -- which it clearly does not.


I've since been convinced American Lifestyle does not suck for everybody. My
apologies for the hurt feelings.

Anyway, just to fuel the fire and duck, your president is coming
to this little small country in few weeks. His security, a local
reporter said last week, includes a 300 meter radius around him were
you cannot walk without a clearance..

Its going to be fun to watch. The day was going to be declared a national
holiday to ease the procedures, but is no longer going to be.



--
Eduardo Kaftanski | To put a pipe in byte mode,
| type PIPE_TYPE_BYTE.
http://e.nn.cl | (from the Visual C++ help file.)

I don't live in Northampton. And I've read CJ's paranoid bull**** here way
too long.

Impeach Bush.

mike regish

"Laura" wrote in message
...


mike regish wrote:

CJ. **** You, you sanctimonious, psycotic piece of ****, faggot, scum
sucking, lying whore of the bushies.

I've wanted to say that for a long ****ing time but didn't out of
poloiteness to the rest of the group. . **** that and **** you. I hope
you
rot in your own excrement.

And your faggot, coward loverboy Bush is the biggest, phoniest asshole
I've
ever seen. It's people like you who **** up the bell curve and make it
possible for such lying sack of ****, self serving liars to get in
office to
begin with.

Oh, I see. You don't have a logical argument nor position, so you are
forced to
use sexuality slurs and reduce yourself to homophobic language as you call
somebody names. Would you shout those same words in the streets of your
hometown, Northhampton? Or do you reserve your toughness for behind your
very
tough keyboard?

And actually, I don't believe CJ made it possible for Clinton to get in
office
at all.

Tell us: If your entire trip had been scuttled by a Shrub/Cheney TFR,
would you even have posted anything about it?

If my trip was scuttled before it happened, I'd have gone somewhere else.
The State Fair would have survived without us.

As was evidenced by my deferred plans to visit Superior, WI last month, I
treat Presidential TFRs no differently than the weather. If it sucks to the
east, I'll fly west -- or vice versa.

Back then I delayed my trip to the Bong Museum by one day, because President
Bush was in Duluth. It made for a funny post, but no real hardship.

And, once again for the reading impaired -- if the President comes to town,
it's a whole different world than if a V.P. candidate rolls in.

Or, at least, it should be.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

"mike regish" wrote in message
news:kiyWc.32759$9d6.23888@attbi_s54...

Impeach Bush.

I'd settle for voting him out in November. But I admire your sentiment.

Michael

Quod scripsi, scripsi.

Jim




Laura
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:


-Huh? Nobody is permitted to criticize Kerry if they weren't draft eligible
30+
-years ago?


Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

Jay, are you a glutton for punishment or what? I personally found your
story humurous with the occasional funny jab at the "Johns" (you forgot
"life support for a hair-do"), but like anywhere else in this country,
it's so polarized you're bound to **** off half of the people, and no
one is going to convince anyone to change their minds.

As far as you and your family not fitting a profile, there is no profile,
everyone is suspect. In "Bush At War" by Bob Woodward, there's
a passage...
....."Disruption is our goal," (CIA Director George) Tenet said. "We
want to change the profile of what we do to provide security at
critical points. To throw them off, to frustrate their planning, show
a different security profile. Something they haven't seen before, haven't
planned against, can't count on. Because the goal is disruption."
Searching everyone from clergymen to elderly ladies at airport
security could send a message to terrorists-no matter how you dress
or how unlikely a suspect you may appear, no one is immune from
scrutiny.........(Simon and Shuster - on loan from library)

Now imagine every TSA/SS worker is driven by that idea and you
can see why they do what they do, right or wrong. Do the Pres/VP
candidates on each side deserve SS protection, of course they do.
Does anyone in this group really want any of these four, regardless
how much you hate them, be attacked? I'd hope no American here
would say yes, and the non-americans who have a problem with
our way of government can mind their own business. We may
not be perfect, but this and the past presidents are ours, for better
or worse, no one asked you.

Even though I saw your attempt at humor, politics, especially right
now, is a good way to make enemies and lose friends. For what?
There's whackjobs in here on both sides of the issue, far left
and far right, neither is better. Luckily most Americans are
somewhere in the middle, regardless of how we're represented
here and abroad by the media.

....but I await your next adventure, hehe.

Chris

--
Steve Bosell for President 2004
"Vote for me or I'll sue you"
www.philhendrieshow.com
http://www.angelfire.com/ca4/philhendrie/lawsuits.html

"H.P." wrote in message m...

How in heavens name would a GA pilot vote for Edwards, a personal injury
lawyer who's inclined to sue General Aviation out of existence? He's
already attempted to sue Obstetricians into oblivion so that pregnant moms
sometimes have to fly to the nearest available OB\GYN willing to deliver
their babies! And can you tell me that John F'n Ketchup won't regulate or
tax GA to death?

Kerry comes across as a semi-active GA pilot so I suspect he'd have at
least some sympathies in our direction.

No question about Johnny Trial Lawyer though. At the end of the day,
400,000 members of AOPA do not have 1% of the clout with the Democrats
that the trial lawyers do. If Hollywood lends them their sizzle it's
the ATLA that pays for the steak.

It's interesting that Bush has not made more of an issue out of
liability limitation as he did in Texas. Cessna's plant in
Independence would be a perfect backdrop for a "success story" on the
subject.

I doubt either guy gives a whit about day-to-day regulation, that's in
the hands of the permanent bureaucracy which nobody really gets to
vote on anymore. As for taxes, again I doubt we'd see big differences.
Barring a change in the House (v. unlikely w/ Texas redistricting)
even Kerry couldn't do anything too radical right now. Meanwhile the
notion of a luxury tax, tried under Bush I, was so thoroughly
discredited by experience that it likely won't be heard from for
another generation. It devastated the boatbuilding industry so badly
even the big lefties had to admit it was a dumb idea.

Best,
-cwk.

I guess it's going to take a Constitutional amendment (sure, right)
to have the option "None of the above".

"Blanche" wrote in message
...
I guess it's going to take a Constitutional amendment (sure, right)
to have the option "None of the above".

It might. I'm not really sure, since to be honest, I've never bothered to
look up what actually defines exactly how we vote.

I mean, yes...the electoral college is from the Constitution, but that's not
the real problem, not as it's used today. If states, for example, allowed
voters to vote for more than one candidate, then a vote for Nader would not
mean (on average) a vote against Kerry, as it does today.

There is ample precedent for alternative voting mechanisms. The main
problem is that the folks who control how we vote are the same folks who
have a vested interest in locking out all of the "third parties". Though,
given how the Democrats claim that Nader screwed up the last election for
them, it may be that they may find that third parties that get popular
enough (and it doesn't take much popularity) are enough of a thorn in their
side that they would be willing to give up their virtual monopoly (shared
with the Republicans, who so far haven't had a similarly disruptive similar
party running with them) on holding office.

One thing's for sure, when you've got one party (the Republicans in this
case) helping fund activities intended to support another party (the
Greens), simply because the more that other party succeeds, the less the
real competition (the Democrats) can succeed, something is really screwed
up.

Pete

"mike regish" wrote in message
news:2nwWc.47620$Fg5.23823@attbi_s53...
CJ. **** You, you sanctimonious, psycotic piece of ****,
faggot, scum sucking, lying whore of the bushies.

I've wanted to say that for a long ****ing time but didn't out
of poloiteness to the rest of the group. . **** that and **** you.
I hope you rot in your own excrement.

And your faggot, coward loverboy Bush is the biggest, phoniest
asshole I've ever seen. It's people like you who **** up the bell
curve and make it possible for such lying sack of ****, self serving
liars to get in office to begin with.

There. Now I feel better.

mike regish

Good post. Very accurately describes CJ. However, you forgot "grumpy old
man".

For another example of CJ's thinking here is one of the better CJ Campbell
quotes:

"There is considerable evidence to the contrary. It appears that Islam not
only sponsors terrorism, it is a way of life. More than 90% of the world's
wars are being fought in Islamic countries. That says a lot about Islam. All
the so-called 'moderate' Islamic sects and countries provide enormous
amounts of money as well as shelter and support to terrorists.

Quite honestly, I think that nuclear sterilization is an option that should
be explored."

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D8


CJ is such a loving, tolerant Mormon.

Earl G





"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
Welcome to the 21st century! Robert Heinline predicted this and much
more in the settings of his novels.

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:25:41 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote in
p91Wc.21556$9d6.17529@attbi_s54::

If this is what we have to look forward to under a
Kerry/Edwards presidency, I fear the worst is yet to come.

I believe it is what occurred during Dubuah's reign.

But I share your confidence that the Kerry presidency is assured.

I sincerely hope not. They should have shot the lying, treasonous war
criminal a long time ago. He betrayed his country, he betrayed everyone
who
served in Vietnam, he met with enemy leaders, he deliberately killed
babies
and then justified by claiming in Congressional testimony that everyone
else
was doing it, he left his one of his own men for dead while fleeing from
an
imaginary attack and only turned around when shamed into it, two of his
Purple Hearts are for self inflicted wounds, he disgraced the medals
that
he
is now so proud of, and he plotted to kill United States senators. He
does
not deny any of this; instead he resorts to personal attacks against
those
who are exposing the truth about him. If personal attacks do not silence
his
enemies, he resorts to threats of violence and lawsuits, which shows
what
he
thinks of freedom of speech.

It speaks volumes about the Democrats that they have sunk so low as to
put
such a slimeball up for the Presidency. The Democratic Party no longer
respects America or Americans, but is solely focused on using fraud and
deceit to achieve power in any way that it can. If this behavior
continues
the only outcome can be civil war.