![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Denton" wrote in message ...
Have there been a disproportionate number of GA airplanes getting bent lately or is it just a perception? There was a rash of accidents in TX, possibly caused by several pilot's lack of attention to high density altitude (it seems several that I looked at news reports may have that as at least one cause). When this is added into the normal "background noise" it might be what you're thinking of. As a sidenote on the perception of airplane accident frequency here's something interesting: I searched news.google.com for "airplane accident" and found 551 total reports. The first page of the reports have dates ranging from 5 August to 18 hours ago. Searching for 'car accident" results in 15,500 hits. The first page reports cover from 12 August to 1 hour ago. Many more over a much shorter period. Apparently almost all the news reports of car accidents are local only, and usually ignored since they're more or less expected. Everyone knows someone who's been in at least one car accident or has been in one themselves. But airplane accidents are much more likely to be publicized nationwide. Most people's lack of familiarity and the wide publicity causes the prevailing "small planes are dangerous" attitude in the general public. I'm familiar with the Nall report and the statistics, and the problems of comparing car miles with airplane hours and the real comparison of safety. I also know that the above Google search results are statistically wrong since there are many many more cars and drivers than there are planes and pilots. But, for making a perception in people's minds it's relevant. What I do know is that car accidents are more likely to be caused by circumstances external to the driver, like other drivers. Airplane accidents, omitting midairs like the Malibu case, are more likely to be caused by a pilot's own issues. Before I started taking lessons I read around 2 years of NSTB reports for TX and VA. I decided that around 2/3 of all accidents were either caused or contributed to by one of two things: 1) Attempting to fly without fuel (in a powered aircraft) or with junk & water in the tanks. 2) Not taking weather into consideration, either flying into bad weather or not dealing with density alt. or haze. So, I check my fuel, and do my fuel use calculations. And I've become a student of meterology. -Malcolm Teas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Indiana National Guard pilot killed in midair collision | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 17th 04 08:08 PM |
Ueberlingen midair: Final report published | Stefan | Piloting | 0 | May 19th 04 12:09 PM |
Georgetown, TX - MIDAIR Collision | Nasir | Piloting | 49 | May 19th 04 02:36 AM |
Midair in RI | Martin | Piloting | 3 | November 18th 03 10:29 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |