![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure you know this syndrome: give a child a toy he/she doesn't
particularly care for. Then try to take that toy away and you will get an instant tantrum! Then take a classroom full of kids who are somewhat scared and confused by the day's activity and commotion, and you have the perfect setup. One little tantrum would spread through the classroom like wildfire, all in front of the TV cameras. At this point, the only things known were that some airplanes had crashed into some buildings, and officials on the scene did not have anymore information than that. And Bush was sitting there calmly. If Bush had tried to get up an leave early, the probably result would have been a bunch of crying kids. And while newsmen aren't generally reporters, under circumstances like these they will ask questions. And then the President would be in a position where if he said everything was O.K., people would want to know why he was leaving. And then the President, who probably didn't know very much at that point, would be battered with questions that he could not have satisfactorily answered. So, Bush finished what he was doing, go up and left with no fuss, and everything ended satisfactorily... "Michael 182" wrote in message news:AINYc.87940$Fg5.51056@attbi_s53... "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were so far out of the loop. I thought it was common knowledge that Bush was reading to some very young children in front of a bunch of television cameras. I had small children - still don't know your point. Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... I'm sure you know this syndrome: give a child a toy he/she doesn't particularly care for. Then try to take that toy away and you will get an instant tantrum! Then take a classroom full of kids who are somewhat scared and confused by the day's activity and commotion, and you have the perfect setup. One little tantrum would spread through the classroom like wildfire, all in front of the TV cameras. At this point, the only things known were that some airplanes had crashed into some buildings, and officials on the scene did not have anymore information than that. And Bush was sitting there calmly. If Bush had tried to get up an leave early, the probably result would have been a bunch of crying kids. And while newsmen aren't generally reporters, under circumstances like these they will ask questions. Sorry - I don't buy it. "Hey kids, looks like the principal needs to talk with me. I'll be back in a minute, ok..." These are little kids. You can tell them just about anything to change course. And this comes from many, many hours spent in a classroom. As for the reporters, of course they ask questions - that's their job. Take it outside. Invoke your handlers. Take control of the situation. Imagine you were in the same situation and you heard that your wife was in a car accident. Do you wait eight minutes to find out if she was hurt? On the way to the hospital? He found out that the country had been attacked! Aside from any other responses President Bush had, it is absurd to defend his inaction as making sure the kids remained calm. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You fault Bush for inaction, fine. Now tell us, chapter and verse, what
action you would have taken.... "Michael 182" wrote in message news:ntOYc.343037$%_6.76663@attbi_s01... "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... I'm sure you know this syndrome: give a child a toy he/she doesn't particularly care for. Then try to take that toy away and you will get an instant tantrum! Then take a classroom full of kids who are somewhat scared and confused by the day's activity and commotion, and you have the perfect setup. One little tantrum would spread through the classroom like wildfire, all in front of the TV cameras. At this point, the only things known were that some airplanes had crashed into some buildings, and officials on the scene did not have anymore information than that. And Bush was sitting there calmly. If Bush had tried to get up an leave early, the probably result would have been a bunch of crying kids. And while newsmen aren't generally reporters, under circumstances like these they will ask questions. Sorry - I don't buy it. "Hey kids, looks like the principal needs to talk with me. I'll be back in a minute, ok..." These are little kids. You can tell them just about anything to change course. And this comes from many, many hours spent in a classroom. As for the reporters, of course they ask questions - that's their job. Take it outside. Invoke your handlers. Take control of the situation. Imagine you were in the same situation and you heard that your wife was in a car accident. Do you wait eight minutes to find out if she was hurt? On the way to the hospital? He found out that the country had been attacked! Aside from any other responses President Bush had, it is absurd to defend his inaction as making sure the kids remained calm. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... You fault Bush for inaction, fine. Now tell us, chapter and verse, what action you would have taken.... Well given that I am in no way qualified to be President, I can't really quote you chapter and verse. On the other hand, I suspect my response to the biggest crisis in the past 50 years would not be to continue reading "Willie Wonka" to a group of kids. Off the top of my head, I suspect there must be some protocol to follow when the US comes under attack. President Bush's behavior after 9/11 may be able to be defended on a number of arguments. I personally disagree with almost all of them, but at least when there is some effort toward reasonableness the arguments can be discussed. But blind support of every facet of his behavior, regardless of fact, is one of the reasons there is such a huge divide in the electorate. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael 182" wrote Imagine you were in the same situation and you heard that your wife was in a car accident. Do you wait eight minutes to find out if she was hurt? On the way to the hospital? He found out that the country had been attacked! Aside from any other responses President Bush had, it is absurd to defend his inaction as making sure the kids remained calm. Michael ***************************** Just a small difference here. I don't suppose you have a whole government, several layers of defense and protocol in place, to care for any situation that comes up involving your wife, do you? The president does. He is an administrator, not a sole caretaker. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm sure you know this syndrome: give a child a toy he/she doesn't particularly care for. Then try to take that toy away and you will get an instant tantrum! Then take a classroom full of kids who are somewhat scared and confused by the day's activity and commotion, and you have the perfect setup. One little tantrum would spread through the classroom like wildfire, all in front of the TV cameras. At this point, the only things known were that some airplanes had crashed into some buildings, and officials on the scene did not have anymore information than that. And Bush was sitting there calmly. If Bush had tried to get up an leave early, the probably result would have been a bunch of crying kids. And while newsmen aren't generally reporters, under circumstances like these they will ask questions. And then the President would be in a position where if he said everything was O.K., people would want to know why he was leaving. And then the President, who probably didn't know very much at that point, would be battered with questions that he could not have satisfactorily answered. So, Bush finished what he was doing, go up and left with no fuss, and everything ended satisfactorily... "Michael 182" wrote in message news:AINYc.87940$Fg5.51056@attbi_s53... "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were so far out of the loop. I thought it was common knowledge that Bush was reading to some very young children in front of a bunch of television cameras. This is the biggest load of unmitigated crap I have ever read, and simply cannot be expected to generate any intelligent response. But how about if dumbo had said something like "children, something has come up that requires my immediate attention, and so I must go." Naw . . . too complex. www.Rosspilot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum differences | Lou Parker | Home Built | 16 | August 25th 04 06:48 PM |
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? | carlos | Owning | 17 | January 29th 04 08:55 PM |
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? | Richard Hertz | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | January 25th 04 07:49 PM |
Differences in models of Foster500 loran | Ray Andraka | Owning | 1 | September 3rd 03 10:47 PM |
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster | Morgans | Home Built | 3 | August 6th 03 04:46 AM |