![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Robinson" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself. That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was. http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics "Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing tenet of Nazi fascism." Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing "... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the right"." "Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists, Communists, and Socialists." http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html "Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other loyalties." "Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it borrows concepts and practices from all three." http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing "... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism being of the right, and communism being of the left." Now you are contradicting yourself. Now you are saying that communism is left wing conservatism, where before you defined the left as being liberal. I don't give a hoot about your definitions. They are self contradictory and arbitrary, as many have pointed out before me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
James Robinson wrote: C J Campbell wrote: If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself. That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was. http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics "Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing tenet of Nazi fascism." Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing "... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the right"." "Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists, Communists, and Socialists." http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html "Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other loyalties." "Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it borrows concepts and practices from all three." http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing "... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism being of the right, and communism being of the left." Now you are contradicting yourself. Now you are saying that communism is left wing conservatism, where before you defined the left as being liberal. I don't give a hoot about your definitions. They are self contradictory and arbitrary, as many have pointed out before me. They aren't "my" definitions. They are ones that are generally accepted in political discussions, and can be found all over internet. I provided links to them to show that Nazism is considered by most to be a right wing political philosophy. Some suggest it is slightly right of center, because of their economic policies and opposition to socialism, and others suggest far more to the right, considering their strong authoritarianism and political conservatism. Few suggest it is left of center. Your discomfort with the definitions is perhaps based on the fact that the single dimensional characteristic of "left" and "right" as a political description is simply inadequate to describe all the complexities of politics. You are free to make up your own, but until the mainstream accepts a diverging definition, then it is useless. The original definition of left-right was intended to separate those who wanted change, i.e. abolition of the French monarchy, from those who wanted to keep things as they were. The overtones of that definition still remain today with "liberal" and "conservative." Over time, the definitions evolved to include an economic description, where left described socialism, and right a more laisez faire economy. Others suggest the economic distinction is more an emphasis of person vs property. Today, this is probably the most important definition of left and right. Superimposed on this is how authoritarian the government is. Harking back to the original definition of left-right, many people connect authoritarianism with the right, since this was a tendency of monarchies. Further, pretty well every government that has had right leaning economic policies has been authoritarian to some extent or other. That said, there is no question that there have been very authoritarian left wing governments, Stalinism comes to mind as an example. Thus, the concept of how authoritarian or liberal a government tends to be is an entirely separate concept from the traditional definitions of left and right. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Robinson" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: Now you are contradicting yourself. Now you are saying that communism is left wing conservatism, where before you defined the left as being liberal. I don't give a hoot about your definitions. They are self contradictory and arbitrary, as many have pointed out before me. They aren't "my" definitions. They are ones that are generally accepted in political discussions, and can be found all over internet. They are both meaningless and useless, no matter who uses them. Of course, you are free to use the terms if you would prefer to avoid thinking for yourself. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , James Robinson writes:
I don't give a hoot about your definitions. They are self contradictory and arbitrary, as many have pointed out before me. They aren't "my" definitions. They are ones that are generally accepted in political discussions, and can be found all over internet. Oh, well. That settles it then. I think the definition of Fascist that is best indicative of the way it is used on the Internet is Rush Limbaugh's "A fascist is a conservative who has just won and argument with a liberal." -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum differences | Lou Parker | Home Built | 16 | August 25th 04 06:48 PM |
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? | carlos | Owning | 17 | January 29th 04 08:55 PM |
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? | Richard Hertz | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | January 25th 04 07:49 PM |
Differences in models of Foster500 loran | Ray Andraka | Owning | 1 | September 3rd 03 10:47 PM |
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster | Morgans | Home Built | 3 | August 6th 03 04:46 AM |