|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 31st 04, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message OK--I can accept all that. What I don't like are the films and videotapes disappearing or being hidden from public. That only makes it look like something is being covered up. Possibly sensitive information about building security or its contents -- it is the Pentagon, after all. Yeah, it could have been procedural. IE, whatever was filmed may or may not contain sensitive information, but as a matter of policy it's not made available to the public. That eliminates the risk that something sensitive, however irrelevant to the incident, doesn't get leaked by accident. -c 
|
|
#2
August 31st 04, 07:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"gatt" wrote in message
... Yeah, it could have been procedural. IE, whatever was filmed may or may not contain sensitive information, but as a matter of policy it's not made available to the public. That eliminates the risk that something sensitive, however irrelevant to the incident, doesn't get leaked by accident. It also eliminates the possibility that someone might gain information simply by the presence or lack of presence of sensitive information. If you only hide video and other media containing sensitive information, it makes it a lot easier for those looking for sensitive information to know where to look.
|
|
#3
August 31st 04, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"gatt" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message OK--I can accept all that. What I don't like are the films and videotapes disappearing or being hidden from public. That only makes it look like something is being covered up. Possibly sensitive information about building security or its contents -- it is the Pentagon, after all. Yeah, it could have been procedural. IE, whatever was filmed may or may not contain sensitive information, but as a matter of policy it's not made available to the public. That eliminates the risk that something sensitive, however irrelevant to the incident, doesn't get leaked by accident. Just like Russia
|
|
#4
September 1st 04, 01:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"CB" wrote in message ... "gatt" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message OK--I can accept all that. What I don't like are the films and videotapes disappearing or being hidden from public. That only makes it look like something is being covered up. Possibly sensitive information about building security or its contents -- it is the Pentagon, after all. Yeah, it could have been procedural. IE, whatever was filmed may or may not contain sensitive information, but as a matter of policy it's not made available to the public. That eliminates the risk that something sensitive, however irrelevant to the incident, doesn't get leaked by accident. Just like Russia Are you suggesting that the United States should not have military secrets?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| First IFR flight after checkride | Wizard of Draws | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | August 31st 04 05:26 AM |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
| PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
| 12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Hybrid Mode
