![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... a real challenge is to distinquish between the "I'll buy the biggest thing I can because I can" people and the folks who are need the capacity as well as the safety. You can't. It's a tough problem, which is why there is talk along the lines of: Classifying SUVs and other trucks designed to carry passengers as passenger vehicles. Legislating improved fuel economy. Increasing usage taxes to more closely match cost of highways and environmental effects. Improving safety of smaller vehicles through improved engineering of large and small vehicles. Improving safety of SUVs through active suspension systems (eg, Bose). Restructuring insurance to account for changed risk profiles. Black boxes in all new vehicles. Alternate fuel (eg, hydrogen, electric) motive systems and infrastructure. Improvement of some, and abandonment of other, mass transit systems. I'm sure there's more, that's just a quick list. Personally I favor a market based system since it requires the least government intervention to run. Under such a system the attempt is made to make the purchase and usage of any vehicle very accurately match the full costs to society of such purchase and use. The base cost may have to include the legally mandated minimum insurance requirement, which should be reduced to decrease the insulation provided to irresponsible drivers. What is assumed to be a "right" to drive should probably move more toward more of a priviledge, to be earned, and respected. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Peter
Gottlieb" wrote: [snip] Under such a system the attempt is made to make the purchase and usage of any vehicle very accurately match the full costs to society of such purchase and use. and that isn't easy. For example, a lot of people talk about zero emissions vehicles which leads to the soundbite of those cars really being pollute-elsewhere vehicles. And which costs society more, the car powered by oil, the car powered by electricity from nukes, or the car powered by electricity from oil/gas/coal? Don't forget the decommissioning of the nuke and the waste, but don't forget the cost of mining and transporting the oil/coal/gas. etc etc etc. -- Bob Noel Seen on Kerry's campaign airplane: "the real deal" oh yeah baby. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
First IFR flight after checkride | Wizard of Draws | Instrument Flight Rules | 44 | August 31st 04 05:26 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |