A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

what happened to flight 77?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 4th 04, 07:36 PM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...

a real challenge is to distinquish between the "I'll buy the biggest
thing I can because I can" people and the folks who are need the capacity
as well as the safety.



You can't. It's a tough problem, which is why there is talk along the lines
of:
Classifying SUVs and other trucks designed to carry passengers as
passenger vehicles.
Legislating improved fuel economy.
Increasing usage taxes to more closely match cost of highways and
environmental effects.
Improving safety of smaller vehicles through improved engineering of
large and small vehicles.
Improving safety of SUVs through active suspension systems (eg,
Bose).
Restructuring insurance to account for changed risk profiles.
Black boxes in all new vehicles.
Alternate fuel (eg, hydrogen, electric) motive systems and
infrastructure.
Improvement of some, and abandonment of other, mass transit systems.

I'm sure there's more, that's just a quick list. Personally I favor a
market based system since it requires the least government intervention to
run. Under such a system the attempt is made to make the purchase and usage
of any vehicle very accurately match the full costs to society of such
purchase and use. The base cost may have to include the legally mandated
minimum insurance requirement, which should be reduced to decrease the
insulation provided to irresponsible drivers. What is assumed to be a
"right" to drive should probably move more toward more of a priviledge, to
be earned, and respected.


  #2  
Old September 5th 04, 01:04 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Peter
Gottlieb" wrote:

[snip]
Under such a system the attempt is made to make the purchase and
usage
of any vehicle very accurately match the full costs to society of such
purchase and use.


and that isn't easy. For example, a lot of people talk about
zero emissions vehicles which leads to the soundbite of
those cars really being pollute-elsewhere vehicles. And
which costs society more, the car powered by oil, the car
powered by electricity from nukes, or the car powered by
electricity from oil/gas/coal? Don't forget the decommissioning
of the nuke and the waste, but don't forget the cost of
mining and transporting the oil/coal/gas. etc etc etc.

--
Bob Noel
Seen on Kerry's campaign airplane: "the real deal"
oh yeah baby.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
First IFR flight after checkride Wizard of Draws Instrument Flight Rules 44 August 31st 04 05:26 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.