![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"pjbphd" wrote
I'm a student pilot and have heard mixed reviews of Flight Sim software. Some say it's great for a little on the ground practice. Others say it's really a waste of time. I don't expect it to really take the place of air time, but I'm wondering if anyone out there can tell me if it's really useful, and if so, what accessories are recommended e.g., yoke and pedals. For VFR flying Flight Sim 2004 is probably next to useless (or worse than useless as some others have indicated) for helping with the real thing. But for flying in the clouds it's nothing short of superb. Clearances, reasonable reproduction of flight dynamics, and not bad weather depiction. I have the yoke and throttle quadrant device from CH Products, which was something like $85 and well worth it. Rudder pedals would be nice, but I haven't forked over for those yet. I'd like to see how accurately a slip or skid can be simulated. Jim Rosinski N3825Q |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:02:59 -0700, Jim Rosinski wrote:
For VFR flying Flight Sim 2004 is probably next to useless (or worse than useless as some others have indicated) for helping with the real thing. But for flying in the clouds it's nothing short of superb. Nah, it can be useful for VFR too. FS2002 and 2004 actually started to have reasonably good terrain in which you could recognize cities, roads, powerlines and lakes. It was useful for me for my PPL. I did not "just fool around" but I planned each flight, made the flight plans, route planning, calculated wind correction, drew the route on the map and so on. When I started the flight, I did it non-stop. If I forgot the plotter to the kitchen table, or if the pencil broke but I had no sharpener, I would not hit "pause" but just tried to deal with the situation. Basically I tried to do "real flights" even though I was sitting on the front of the computer. This, while it was just simulated and might sound a bit silly, made me go through the routine of flying just as much as if I was flying for real. The "stick and rudder" stuff is just one part of flying, and I agree a simulator can be a limited help in that area. It took me about 60 landings to "get it" despite (or because ![]() experience.. But there's a LOT more in aviation - situation awareness, navigation, communicating with air traffic controllers, airspace, flight planning etc. When all this could be practiced at home, it made me much more relaxed on the real flight, since I had usually flown the same route before on the simulator, I became familiar with the speed of the aircraft and what it meant in terms of inches on the map, what altitudes to use and what frequencies to use etc.. Also on the sim I had to rely on the "big picture" of the landscape instead of individual local landmarks, which I think is a good thing. So instead of recognizing a particular church building I learned to look for things like "a lake with a town in the west side" and "road crossing a river" etc.. Things you can find on a map even though you dont know the area. I also feel I am more confident with the use of VORs and such since the simulator is a good practice device for those. I encountered low ceiling (still VMC though) during my cross country solo flight, and it surprised me since I was used to navigating on higher altitude where visibility was excellent. The lower clouds restricted the visibility to a much shorter distance in the horizon, and I got pushed sideways by crosswind. I then missed a landmark and realized I was not where I intended. In that situation I cross checked two VOR radials and found myself on the map again. This was a routine thing I had intentionally practiced on FS2002 several times before, and I am glad I had. It helped to keep the workload lower on that situation and perhaps even kept me calm instead of getting nervous in the cockpit. So, yea, in my opinion it can be useful. //Tuomas |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tuomas Kuosmanen" wrote in message
news ![]() On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:02:59 -0700, Jim Rosinski wrote: The "stick and rudder" stuff is just one part of flying, and I agree a simulator can be a limited help in that area. It took me about 60 landings to "get it" despite (or because ![]() experience.. The landing flare is the one phase of flying that my sim practice hadn't prepared me for. For everything else, including ground-reference maneuvers, I found it quite helpful. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Breaking News - 9/11 Flight Confrimed | John A. Weeks III | Military Aviation | 12 | June 12th 04 03:45 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |