![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wdtabor" wrote in message ... In article , "CB" writes: Shift the sales taxes away from the things people need to have to live and put tax on the things that are not essentials to live. THe FairTax addresses this not by exempting certain goods, but by rebating the sales tax paid on spending up to the level determined as needed to cover basic expenses. Using a formula very similar to that currently used to determine the poverty line, the tax paid on necessities for a given family size is determined and each month you get a check (or more likely, an electronic deposit) to reimburse you for that tax. The effect is that basic living spending is tax free to everyone, rich or poor alike. The trouble with all these great ideas is that the cost of administering the taxes can out weight the tax benefit. In theory your idea sounds great, but the beauracracy involved would be immense. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CB" writes:
The trouble with all these great ideas is that the cost of administering the taxes can out weight the tax benefit. In theory your idea sounds great, but the beauracracy involved would be immense. How would it compare to the current bureaucracy? -jav |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "CB"
writes: The trouble with all these great ideas is that the cost of administering the taxes can out weight the tax benefit. In theory your idea sounds great, but the beauracracy involved would be immense. ?? What bureaucracy? Other than those which already exist? The tax will be collected by the States using their existing sales tax bureaucracy, and the States will receive a commission to cover their small costs for doing so. The rebates will be sent out by the existing Social Security mechanisms, at the cost of a bit more paper. In return, the IRS will cease to exist. The day the FairTax goes into effect, they turn off the lights at the IRS, and all of their records, other than those needed for collection actions in progress, will be destroyed. That will save us the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS, PLUS the $400 Billion spent by businesses and individuals to comply with the IRS code. The FairTax will reduce the total state and federal tax bureacracy by by at least 90% over all, and the cost of collection will be built into the collection mechanism. Your personal tax compliance effort will be to send in a form once a year telling the SS folks how many people are in your family and what their SS numbers are. Retail businesses will collect the tax as they do with sales taxes now and turn them into the state, just as they do now. They will no longer have to withold taxes from employees, calculate depreciation, or any of the other accounting that is otherwise not needed in operating the business. Their monthly tax return will look something like Retail Sales X Tax Rate = Amount enclosed. That's it. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wdtabor wrote:
.......That will save us the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS..... In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B - $11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of the rest of it. -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc J. Zeitlin" wrote in message news ![]() Wdtabor wrote: .......That will save us the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS..... In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B - $11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of the rest of it. Source? Allen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen asked:
Wdtabor wrote: .......That will save us the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS..... In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B - $11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of the rest of it. Source? http://www.unclefed.com/Tax-News/2002/nrfs02-09.html Seems authoritative enough..... -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article Ddo%c.143369$Fg5.24547@attbi_s53, "Marc J. Zeitlin"
writes: Wdtabor wrote: .......That will save us the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS..... In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B - $11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of the rest of it. You are correct, I misremembered that one. Even so, the cost of compliance by the private sector are nearly equal to 20% of the total collected. Nearly all of that would be eliminated under the FairTax for business, and compliance cost for individuals would be one first class stamp a year. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wdtabor" wrote in message ... Even so, the cost of compliance by the private sector are nearly equal to 20% of the total collected. Nearly all of that would be eliminated under the FairTax for business, and compliance cost for individuals would be one first class stamp a year. Is there a spreadsheet or other computer model available where one could enter hypothetical situations and see the difference in tax from the old to proposed new system? I am curious as to how my situation would change, and also that of my clients. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Peter Gottlieb"
writes: "Wdtabor" wrote in message ... Even so, the cost of compliance by the private sector are nearly equal to 20% of the total collected. Nearly all of that would be eliminated under the FairTax for business, and compliance cost for individuals would be one first class stamp a year. Is there a spreadsheet or other computer model available where one could enter hypothetical situations and see the difference in tax from the old to proposed new system? I am curious as to how my situation would change, and also that of my clients. There is a study by Stanford University under the research tab at the website www.fairtax.org comparing how the change would affect various parts of the population. Most do quite well, though a small percentage of seniors with accumulated wealth will lose about 2% of their buying power. Even so, most seniors do care about the world they will hand off to their grandchildren and of course, there is no death tax under the FairTax, so no need to divert resources to elaborate sheleters or trusts to pass on their wealth. There are really few questions about the plan you cannot find the answer to either under the Research or Volunteer tabs. Don -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wdtabor" wrote in message ... There are really few questions about the plan you cannot find the answer to either under the Research or Volunteer tabs. Thanks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum differences | Lou Parker | Home Built | 16 | August 25th 04 06:48 PM |
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? | carlos | Owning | 17 | January 29th 04 08:55 PM |
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? | Richard Hertz | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | January 25th 04 07:49 PM |
Differences in models of Foster500 loran | Ray Andraka | Owning | 1 | September 3rd 03 10:47 PM |
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster | Morgans | Home Built | 3 | August 6th 03 04:46 AM |