A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rep vs. Dem Differences



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 7th 04, 06:09 PM
CB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wdtabor" wrote in message
...
In article , "CB"

writes:


Shift the sales taxes away from the things people need to have to live and
put tax on the things that are not essentials to live.


THe FairTax addresses this not by exempting certain goods, but by rebating
the
sales tax paid on spending up to the level determined as needed to cover
basic
expenses.

Using a formula very similar to that currently used to determine the
poverty
line, the tax paid on necessities for a given family size is determined
and
each month you get a check (or more likely, an electronic deposit) to
reimburse
you for that tax. The effect is that basic living spending is tax free to
everyone, rich or poor alike.



The trouble with all these great ideas is that the cost of administering the
taxes can out weight the tax benefit. In theory your idea sounds great, but
the beauracracy involved would be immense.


  #2  
Old September 7th 04, 06:21 PM
Javier Henderson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"CB" writes:

The trouble with all these great ideas is that the cost of administering the
taxes can out weight the tax benefit. In theory your idea sounds great, but
the beauracracy involved would be immense.


How would it compare to the current bureaucracy?

-jav
  #3  
Old September 7th 04, 06:35 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "CB"
writes:


The trouble with all these great ideas is that the cost of administering the
taxes can out weight the tax benefit. In theory your idea sounds great, but
the beauracracy involved would be immense.



??

What bureaucracy? Other than those which already exist?

The tax will be collected by the States using their existing sales tax
bureaucracy, and the States will receive a commission to cover their small
costs for doing so.

The rebates will be sent out by the existing Social Security mechanisms, at the
cost of a bit more paper.

In return, the IRS will cease to exist. The day the FairTax goes into effect,
they turn off the lights at the IRS, and all of their records, other than those
needed for collection actions in progress, will be destroyed. That will save us
the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS, PLUS the $400 Billion
spent by businesses and individuals to comply with the IRS code.

The FairTax will reduce the total state and federal tax bureacracy by by at
least 90% over all, and the cost of collection will be built into the
collection mechanism.

Your personal tax compliance effort will be to send in a form once a year
telling the SS folks how many people are in your family and what their SS
numbers are.

Retail businesses will collect the tax as they do with sales taxes now and turn
them into the state, just as they do now. They will no longer have to withold
taxes from employees, calculate depreciation, or any of the other accounting
that is otherwise not needed in operating the business. Their monthly tax
return will look something like

Retail Sales X Tax Rate = Amount enclosed.

That's it.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #4  
Old September 7th 04, 08:45 PM
Marc J. Zeitlin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wdtabor wrote:

.......That will save us
the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS.....


In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B -
$11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of the
rest of it.

--
Marc J. Zeitlin
http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/
http://www.cozybuilders.org/
Copyright (c) 2004


  #5  
Old September 7th 04, 10:50 PM
Allen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Marc J. Zeitlin" wrote in message
newsdo%c.143369$Fg5.24547@attbi_s53...
Wdtabor wrote:

.......That will save us
the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS.....


In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B -
$11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of the
rest of it.


Source?

Allen


  #6  
Old September 7th 04, 11:14 PM
Marc J. Zeitlin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Allen asked:

Wdtabor wrote:

.......That will save us
the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS.....


In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B -
$11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of

the
rest of it.


Source?


http://www.unclefed.com/Tax-News/2002/nrfs02-09.html

Seems authoritative enough.....

--
Marc J. Zeitlin
http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/
http://www.cozybuilders.org/
Copyright (c) 2004


  #7  
Old September 8th 04, 01:51 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article Ddo%c.143369$Fg5.24547@attbi_s53, "Marc J. Zeitlin"
writes:


Wdtabor wrote:

.......That will save us
the $100Billion it costs us each year to operate the IRS.....


In the interest of accuracy, the budget of the IRS is about $10B -
$11B - you're off by a factor of 10. I have no comment about any of the
rest of it.


You are correct, I misremembered that one.

Even so, the cost of compliance by the private sector are nearly equal to 20%
of the total collected. Nearly all of that would be eliminated under the
FairTax for business, and compliance cost for individuals would be one first
class stamp a year.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #8  
Old September 8th 04, 02:55 PM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wdtabor" wrote in message
...

Even so, the cost of compliance by the private sector are nearly equal to
20%
of the total collected. Nearly all of that would be eliminated under the
FairTax for business, and compliance cost for individuals would be one
first
class stamp a year.



Is there a spreadsheet or other computer model available where one could
enter hypothetical situations and see the difference in tax from the old to
proposed new system?

I am curious as to how my situation would change, and also that of my
clients.


  #9  
Old September 8th 04, 03:28 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Peter Gottlieb"
writes:


"Wdtabor" wrote in message
...

Even so, the cost of compliance by the private sector are nearly equal to
20%
of the total collected. Nearly all of that would be eliminated under the
FairTax for business, and compliance cost for individuals would be one
first
class stamp a year.



Is there a spreadsheet or other computer model available where one could
enter hypothetical situations and see the difference in tax from the old to
proposed new system?

I am curious as to how my situation would change, and also that of my
clients.


There is a study by Stanford University under the research tab at the website
www.fairtax.org comparing how the change would affect various parts of the
population. Most do quite well, though a small percentage of seniors with
accumulated wealth will lose about 2% of their buying power.

Even so, most seniors do care about the world they will hand off to their
grandchildren and of course, there is no death tax under the FairTax, so no
need to divert resources to elaborate sheleters or trusts to pass on their
wealth.

There are really few questions about the plan you cannot find the answer to
either under the Research or Volunteer tabs.

Don

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #10  
Old September 8th 04, 04:02 PM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Wdtabor" wrote in message
...

There are really few questions about the plan you cannot find the answer
to
either under the Research or Volunteer tabs.



Thanks


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aluminum differences Lou Parker Home Built 16 August 25th 04 06:48 PM
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? carlos Owning 17 January 29th 04 08:55 PM
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? Richard Hertz Instrument Flight Rules 19 January 25th 04 07:49 PM
Differences in models of Foster500 loran Ray Andraka Owning 1 September 3rd 03 10:47 PM
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster Morgans Home Built 3 August 6th 03 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.