![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I'll give you this much Honek. I missed your "cool" sign for some
reason the first time I checked out your site and posted back on your "request" that I join you in "changing" things I've already been changing for the last fifty years; not realizing that sign was there. My mistake! I don't give a rat's ass how many posts have addressed this issue. One fact remains for me when dealing with you on this, and that is the simple fact that of all the titles you could have used for a site showing people dying in airplanes you actively thought about it and CHOSE the phrase "COOL". You know, Dud, your hypocrisy is really starting to irk me. 1. I've tried to spoon-feed you the explanation for how the page -- an insignificant page in a gigantic website -- evolved from "cool" videos to what it is today -- an explanation you have disdained. 2. I have given you every opportunity to explain your ethical (and bizarre) opposition to the viewing of these videos -- which you have refused to do. 3. I have put up with your condescending tone and sanctimonious attitude -- despite the fact that you quite obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about. 4. Despite all this, I EVEN GAVE YOU THE CHANCE TO PUT YOUR PERSONAL IMPRIMATUR ON EACH GOD DAMNED VIDEO, so that they would be truly "safety oriented" -- an action which you decided you were not qualified to perform. I have exercised extreme patience with someone I thought was worthy of admiration and honor over the last several years, hoping that perhaps logic and good spirits would prevail over irrationality and surliness. Now you have the audacity and impudence to insult and threaten me, in this public forum (AND in private email)? At last your true colors are showing, sir. What a shame. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:Nuu%c.1949$D%.1269@attbi_s51... Well, I'll give you this much Honek. I missed your "cool" sign for some reason the first time I checked out your site and posted back on your "request" that I join you in "changing" things I've already been changing for the last fifty years; not realizing that sign was there. My mistake! I don't give a rat's ass how many posts have addressed this issue. One fact remains for me when dealing with you on this, and that is the simple fact that of all the titles you could have used for a site showing people dying in airplanes you actively thought about it and CHOSE the phrase "COOL". You know, Dud, your hypocrisy is really starting to irk me. 1. I've tried to spoon-feed you the explanation for how the page -- an insignificant page in a gigantic website -- evolved from "cool" videos to what it is today -- an explanation you have disdained. I asked you NOT to post under me again, but I can see that's useless. I'll engage you. Your bull**** statement above STILL doesn't explain how you added crash video with people dying in aiplanes and STILL allowed the two words "COOL" and "ENJOY" to remain on your site. Those two words were there every time you looked at the site and could have been removed at any time.....but you DIDN'T remove those two insane words did you? You left them there knowing full well that you were putting death scenes on the site with these two words an active part of the presentation. You're full of **** Honek, and a phoney of the first order. You were using that page for the "interest" it would generate in your GD hotel, and I don't give a damn how much you say the page wasn't seen. You obviously wanted it just the way it was or you would have changed it! 2. I have given you every opportunity to explain your ethical (and bizarre) opposition to the viewing of these videos -- which you have refused to do. Then I'll do it again for you here and now, just as I've done it several times before this. I don't object to crash video. I object to idiots like you presenting it under the words "COOL" and "ENJOY". Is that plain enough for you you jerk? 3. I have put up with your condescending tone and sanctimonious attitude -- despite the fact that you quite obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about. Right! I'll inform the rest of the world immediately! They'll want to retract fifty years of sought after professional advice. 4. Despite all this, I EVEN GAVE YOU THE CHANCE TO PUT YOUR PERSONAL IMPRIMATUR ON EACH GOD DAMNED VIDEO, so that they would be truly "safety oriented" -- an action which you decided you were not qualified to perform. Right! I'm not qualified. What you did was conviently forget to inform me that this "video" of yours was appearing under the words "COOL" and "ENJOY". You'll never know how lucky you were I caught this before putting my name on that site. Your hotel lobby would have become a meeting place for some very angry people with a lot to say to you personally. I have exercised extreme patience with someone I thought was worthy of admiration and honor over the last several years, hoping that perhaps logic and good spirits would prevail over irrationality and surliness. Oh give me a ****ing break! You tried to con me into coming on your site with you in one of your "put up or shut up deals" and it didn't work. Who the hell do you think you're kidding? Now you have the audacity and impudence to insult and threaten me, in this public forum (AND in private email)? ....and I'll repeat it for you here, exactly as I wrote it to you. In fact, I'm pasting it in here word for word. If you have any "threats" that are different, feel free to post them with my name on them. I wrote to you; ver batum; Congratulations moron; a wonderful job of hotel marketing...simply wonderful. In one swell swoop, you have shown the world that you not only allow, but CHOOSE adjectives such as "cool" and "enjoy" to appear on your web site along with video of people dying in airplanes and the WTC to boot. You're simply brilliant fella...REAL Mensa material. As if this isn't enough, in the same thread, you invite one of the world's most involved pilots on the subject of flight safety to join you in this endeavor bringing his personal attention to the site. Then you manage to **** off that pilot so badly he downloads the site and is sending it out to every aviation contact he has to be used to bring attention to the issue along with suitable remarks. Yes Honek, thank you so much for bringing your wonderful web site to my attention! BTW, I'm sending it out both showing it before and after the changes. and oh yes, you have ****ed off the worst person you could have possibly picked to confront on this issue...trust me!!! I guess you didn't know Mark McGeehan did you asshole? Great guy......Bud Holland's right seat. He's dead of course! '"COOL" "ENJOY" Do yourself a favor Honek. Post under me in the future at your own risk. I won't EVER post to you again unless posted first by you, and if you do, post under me on ANY subject, consider me totally hostile, and this will NEVER change as long as I'm on Usenet! Enjoy your hotel! Dudley Plain enough for you. I don't see any "threats" there. Just some actions I've taken concerning my reaction and comment on a web site that is completely public domain. God, what a ****ing moron you are. Threatening my ass! The only threats you have received from me is the threat that had I actually posted to your site in the interest of flight safety; then discovered your use of the two words "COOL" and "ENJOY" with my name under them; I would have marched into your GD lobby with several dozen other "interested" parties from the aviation community and demanded that you remove my name and any reference of me from your website! Go on moron, show us some more threats other than that! At last your true colors are showing, sir. What a shame. Yeah; RIGHT! My colors!! Give it a rest Honek. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" .....and of course the always present hotel link! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dudley Henriques" wrote God, what a ****ing moron you are. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship I had always thought you to be a bit sanctimonious, but I put up with it for the knowledge you brought. It just isn't worth it any longer. Plonk. Sigh. -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.752 / Virus Database: 503 - Release Date: 9/3/2004 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote God, what a ****ing moron you are. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship I had always thought you to be a bit sanctimonious, but I put up with it for the knowledge you brought. It just isn't worth it any longer. Plonk. Sigh. -- Jim in NC Thank God! I'm done with at least one idiot anyway! Now if a few more of you out there who have "put up with me" through the years while learning something from me like this idiot says he did will only go "plonk", perhaps I'll be left after I've cooled off with the people who are worthwhile around this place. Go on gang, let's clean this up once and for all. All you "plonkers" who can't deal with my anger about this go on and get it done. The rest of you out there have been a pleasure for me through the years and I'm sure that you realize that tomorrow, when I'm not quite so angry as I am right now, my dialog will return to it's usual non aggressive manner. In the meanwhile, the plonkers are welcome to plonk as they see fit. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... I had always thought you to be a bit sanctimonious, but I put up with it for the knowledge you brought. It just isn't worth it any longer. Plonk. Sigh. -- Jim in NC Your loss! Tex Houston |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
God, what a ****ing moron you are. Threatening my ass! The only threats
you have received from me is the threat that had I actually posted to your site in the interest of flight safety; then discovered your use of the two words "COOL" and "ENJOY" with my name under them; Dudley -- if this really IS you -- this is just another display of irrationality. For example, you might stop to consider that your participation in the re-design of the website would have meant the elimination of any potentially offensive words, like "cool" and "enjoy." After all, YOU would have been writing the captions. To any internet experts who might be reading this: Is it possible that someone has hijacked Dudley's email address and Usenet signature? I find it absolutely impossible to believe that the bizarre posts I'm reading here under his name are from the same guy who has been posting here for all these years. Between the profanity and bizarre leaps of illogic, they don't appear to be written in Dudley's same style and manner. It's either criminal, or sad -- I don't know which. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:1gv%c.112$LT5.78@attbi_s52... God, what a ****ing moron you are. Threatening my ass! The only threats you have received from me is the threat that had I actually posted to your site in the interest of flight safety; then discovered your use of the two words "COOL" and "ENJOY" with my name under them; Dudley -- if this really IS you -- this is just another display of irrationality. For example, you might stop to consider that your participation in the re-design of the website would have meant the elimination of any potentially offensive words, like "cool" and "enjoy." After all, YOU would have been writing the captions. To any internet experts who might be reading this: Is it possible that someone has hijacked Dudley's email address and Usenet signature? I find it absolutely impossible to believe that the bizarre posts I'm reading here under his name are from the same guy who has been posting here for all these years. Between the profanity and bizarre leaps of illogic, they don't appear to be written in Dudley's same style and manner. It's either criminal, or sad -- I don't know which. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Sorry, no sale! You made no mention to me about any ability to change your wording on your site until this moment, and it was by sheer accident I discovered those two words before joining you, which would have been a HUGE mistake for me. I've cooled off enough now to clean up my language with you, but I haven't changed my mind one iota about either you or the site. You have yet to explain, not necessarily to me, but to everyone here, how you allowed the words COOL and ENJOY to CONTINUE UNCHANGED as you were putting crash video with people dying, on your site. You have the option to do that now if you wish. If not, I'll let it be! Just be advised that you and I are not on friendly terms any longer. I will not post to you unless posted to by you. If you can abide by that, you will hear no more from me on this issue. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, no sale! You made no mention to me about any ability to change
your wording on your site until this moment, and it was by sheer accident I discovered those two words before joining you, which would have been a HUGE mistake for me. The only mistake you have made was not thinking before typing. I invited you to write an "expert" safety commentary on each video. This would have included pretty much anything you wanted to write. Just be advised that you and I are not on friendly terms any longer. I'll still be here, and there will still be a cold one waiting for you whenever you come to Oshkosh or Iowa City -- but not till after they've adjusted your meds. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:%wC%c.132129$9d6.177@attbi_s54... Sorry, no sale! You made no mention to me about any ability to change your wording on your site until this moment, and it was by sheer accident I discovered those two words before joining you, which would have been a HUGE mistake for me. The only mistake you have made was not thinking before typing. I invited you to write an "expert" safety commentary on each video. This would have included pretty much anything you wanted to write. Listen up Jay, and see if you can get once and for all what I'm telling you about you, your site, and how that relates to all this crap you're trying to soft sell around here about flight safety being a "concern" of yours and how I could have "contributed" to your site simply by accepting your idiotic offer to me. I made it quite plain in my initial answer to you but since flight safety was never really your reason for making your "offer" in the first place, it must have gone right over your head. In viewing crash video in a flight safety context, to even begin to get useful data from that video, it takes weeks of intensive work by a team of experts using eye witness accounts coupled with more expert technical opinion from factory reps and technicicans before even a glimmer of factual information begins to emerge. There are literally hundreds of factors to be considered before one...yes, I said ONE single useful detail emerges that can be truthfully considered as a probable cause. After THAT has taken place, the same experts have to gather again and prepare a report that suggests the changes necessary to help prevent that SPECIFIC accident from happening again. Now, perhaps you can see why people in the flight safety business frown on people like you pushing the flight safety issue as the excuse for showing crash video on a public web site. The plain simple truth is that there is no flight safety benefit derived from viewing these videos simply from the video itself. Sure, any moron can comment on the video. That doesn't take any brains at all; but it's just conjecture, even if it's from an "expert" like me! So don't try and push this "all you had to do was comment" thing at me pal, I know better, and I hope some of the rest of the pilots around here know better as well. Crash video put up on a public web site is simply crash video. You can spout off all day long about getting "experts" to comment for safety reasons, but all that is from a professional viewpoint is an excuse for showing the videos. You "invited" me to join you on your web site and I declined for several reasons. The above are the professional reasons. The personal reason was because I realized your "invitation" to me was simply a "put up or shut up" scenario, and I don't respond to that to begin with. Then, when I discovered you had the words COOL and ENJOY on the site, your "invitation" became the ultimate insult! No ligitimate person even remotely involved in flight safety issues would even consider being involved on a site like yours. If you doubt this, go find another ligitimate safety expert who will accept your "offer" to comment on crash video showing people dying on the same page as the words COOL and ENJOY; then come back and let us now who he or she is. I'd like to meet that person, and I'm betting there are others on this group who would like to meet them too. Just be advised that you and I are not on friendly terms any longer. I'll still be here, and there will still be a cold one waiting for you whenever you come to Oshkosh or Iowa City -- but not till after they've adjusted your meds. No thank you. I have no control over who I have to deal with on Usenet, but I can still pick with whom I want to share a drink. People who show crash video on commercial hotel websites under the heading COOL and ENJOY trying to involve my expertise to help sell hotel rooms I don't drink with. In closing, I have an invitation for you in front of this entire group. If you're all that enamoured with my expertise as a flight safety expert, and you have all this unbounded respect for my opinion on the issue that caused you to invite me on your crash page with you; and have so stated this high regard for my opinion on this newsgroup ; then after what I've told you in this post about the uselessness of viewing crash video on a public web page for safety reasons, let me now suggest that you remove all crash video from your web site nor that you know it has so little value in the flight safety context. As they say in chess......CHECK!!!! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now, perhaps you can see why people in the flight safety business frown
on people like you pushing the flight safety issue as the excuse for showing crash video on a public web site. The plain simple truth is that there is no flight safety benefit derived from viewing these videos simply from the video itself. First of all, I never claimed that my website had ANYTHING to do with "flight safety" -- although I offered you the chance to help change that. Putting that aside for the moment, let's see if I've got your new story straight. 1. You started this thread by commenting that you "detest" people who show aviation accident videos on the internet, because the videos have no connection to flight safety. 2. You went on to say that you were fine with these videos, IF they were presented in the context of flight safety. In other words, with proper commentary. 3. You describe yourself as a "flight safety expert" -- but freely admit that you're not "qualified" to intelligently comment on ANY of the videos. How is this possible? The videos on our website depict some of the most famous air disasters in recorded history -- yet you, an avowed "expert" in the field, with 50 years of experience, cannot comment? 4. NOW you're stating that there can be NO flight safety benefit derived from viewing these videos on-line, anywhere, ever? Pardon me, but your slip is showing. Crash video put up on a public web site is simply crash video. You can spout off all day long about getting "experts" to comment for safety reasons, but all that is from a professional viewpoint is an excuse for showing the videos. I had no intention of getting any "experts" to comment on any videos, until you made your entry into this thread. The videos are on the site because (a) I find them to be fascinating, and (b) they are extremely popular. Whether you -- or any other "flight safety expert" comments on any of the videos is of no consequence. I thought adding commentary was an idea with some merit, as long as you and I happened to be discussing the issue -- nothing more, nothing less. You "invited" me to join you on your web site and I declined for several reasons. The above are the professional reasons. The personal reason was because I realized your "invitation" to me was simply a "put up or shut up" scenario, and I don't respond to that to begin with. Doncha just hate that when someone calls your bluff? You were given the opportunity to prove to the world (or, at least, this little worldwide newsgroup) that you were indeed some sort of a "flight safety expert." You had a perfect opportunity to correct what you had announced was a horrible injustice, by helping to change our video page into a truly useful (rather than just mildly interesting) web page -- but, as expected, you instead have come up with a dozen bogus reasons why you can't do it. Then, when THAT bluff was called, you went off on wild, raging tantrums, simply to divert attention away from the fact that you really have no interest in changing ANYTHING -- you just want to sit on the sidelines, and throw stones. Put up or shut up, indeed. Your chance has come, and -- thankfully -- gone. In closing, I have an invitation for you in front of this entire group. If you're all that enamoured with my expertise as a flight safety expert, and you have all this unbounded respect for my opinion on the issue that caused you to invite me on your crash page with you; and have so stated this high regard for my opinion on this newsgroup ; then after what I've told you in this post about the uselessness of viewing crash video on a public web page for safety reasons, let me now suggest that you remove all crash video from your web site nor that you know it has so little value in the flight safety context. My respect, admiration, and honor were sadly and clearly misplaced. After reading your diatribes of the last several days, I can only thank God that you declined my invitation. As I've already stated, I will be making some minor changes to the wording on the page, as my time permits. As they say in chess......CHECK!!!! Have a nice life, Dudley. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Piloting | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
New Aviation Videos and a Rogue's Gallery Update! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 3 | December 28th 03 04:49 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |