![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter, stay on topic, this is a Cessna 206.
Peter Duniho wrote: "john smith" wrote in message ... Okay, if I said by independent, it is moved by cable connected to a wheel and not by the yoke or stick, would that satisfy you? It's not a question of "satisfying" me. But if you're going to ask that question, then I'd suggest you consider whether there are ANY trim systems that don't qualify as "independent" under that definition (I assume the important part of your definition is the "not by the yoke or stick", rather than the "moved by a cable"). There are, of course -- the Cirrus trim system comes to mind -- but they are incredibly rare. I don't think that's a very useful definition of "independent", because it fails to rule out practically all trim systems. But in any case, if that's the definition you're going to use, you ought to have been explicit about it, since I don't think most people would immediately think of that use of the word when it's written. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"john smith" wrote in message
... Peter, stay on topic, this is a Cessna 206. So what if the original airplane was a 206? Are you trying to say that one should only interpret the word "independent" as it might apply to the 206? That the general definition as it might apply to all airplanes is irrelevant? Why bother saying that the trim control is "independent" at all then? Why not just say "it's a 206 trim control"? I mean, as near as I can tell from what "logic" you've been using, that would say all that needs to be said. Anyway, it's clear you don't really care whether anyone actually understands what you write, and like I said, it's not a question of "satisfying" me. You do what you like, the rest of us will just stand by and watch you make yourself look dumb. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote: stand by and watch you make yourself look dumb. With all your ranting you're not looking like a shining star either. Sheesh, I'm sorry I posted anything. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:53:53 -0800, Dale wrote:
In article , "Peter Duniho" wrote: stand by and watch you make yourself look dumb. With all your ranting you're not looking like a shining star either. Sheesh, I'm sorry I posted anything. ....as long as it stops the bickering. z |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dale wrote:
Sheesh, I'm sorry I posted anything. Dale, Nice job handling your emergency situation! I'm glad it turned out O.K. Part of the fun here is watching threads get twisted and turned by the local "experts" ![]() Happy Flying! Scott Skylane |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dale" wrote in message
... With all your ranting you're not looking like a shining star either. Ah, yes...the Usenet variation on the old "takes one to know one" or "I know you are, but what am I?" retorts. How clever of you... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Elevator | Big John | Home Built | 111 | July 21st 04 04:31 PM |
Space slingshot was: Space Elevator | Keith Goodwin | Home Built | 1 | June 29th 04 04:11 PM |
Wanted - Cessna U206A elevator | Colin Fitzmaurice | Owning | 0 | May 18th 04 11:06 AM |
Wanted - Cessna U206A elevator | Colin Fitzmaurice | Owning | 0 | May 18th 04 11:05 AM |
Wanted - Cessna U206A elevator | Colin Fitzmaurice | Owning | 0 | May 1st 04 03:51 PM |