![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote
In general, I would expect a club to have less restrictive rules than an FBO Let's just say this has not been my experience. Maybe that's why there are not many clubs in my area (and none on my field). I think clubs tend to form when the local FBO's get obnoxious. Nobody wants other club members to be reckless with the airplanes, and it is inevitable that within any group of people, there will be different opinions on where "fun and challenging" leaves off and "reckless" begins. Of course the ones who think it's reckless are wrong ![]() I'm actually about 99% serious about this. 99% of the time, when someone says "that's reckless" what he really means is "I couldn't pull this off consistently AND I don't want you to do it." Here's what makes a club worse. At an FBO, one guy is boss. He has his hot buttons, and those become rules. At a club, these things are done by committee. There is compromise. Unfortunately, the compromise usually turns out to be "I'll vote for your hot-button rules if you vote for mine." That's how formation flights, acrobatics, and such get banned. You would think that there would be a healthy push back from the people who don't like making rules, but they're usually not there at the board meeting. They're too busy flying formation, doing acro, etc. My club used to have no rule about grass at all. A few years back, somebody brought our Arrow back covered with grass stains. A discussion ensued, and we ended up passing a rule forbidding landing any of our retracts on a non-paved runway. Oddly enough, we don't require any special checkout for grass. See, this is exactly the kind of crap I'm talking about. Grass stains? My god - do you really think tall grass is rougher on the airplane than concrete dust? I pretty routinely operate my Twin Comanche off grass. I know guys who base Barons and C-310's off grass. An Arrow on grass is a non-event. On the other hand, there ARE things to know about landing on grass. Most of it has nothing to do with the actual takeoff and landing - dry grass in good condition requires no special technique. But there is a lot to know about asessing the quality of a grass surface before you land on it, deciding when to abort a takeoff, etc. Given how pathetic the FAA requirements are in this area, a special checkout would make sense. Preferably from someone who has plenty of experience landing fast, heavy, retractable gear airplanes on unpaved strips. Most rules come about because at one time in the past, somebody did something which other people considered unacceptable and they wanted to try and prevent it from happening again. Congress does this, the FAA does this, FBO's do it, and there's no reason to be surprised when clubs do it too. It's the way life works. Yup. Only at an FBO, it has to be something the owner found unacceptable. The FAA is slow and bureaucratic - one incident is rarely enough to make anything happen. Ditto Congress. Clubs, unfortunately, tend to combine the worst of all worlds. I would certainly urge anybody who is thinking of joining a club to read all the rules carefully before joining. As well as find out how difficult it is to make rules, and what people in the club do. For example, if people routinely fly formation, it's not likely that it will be forbidden. On the other hand, if you do it and start doing it, the club weenies may well decide to forbid it - or to make everyone get FAST cards, which is about the same. Michael |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Michael wrote:
As well as find out how difficult it is to make rules, and what people in the club do. This probably explains the lack of silly rules in the BAAC - a change to the bylaws required a vote *by the whole membership*, not just the board. The other thing about the club is it didn't own the aircraft (and therefore the initiation fee and membership dues were very low), it leased them back (the owner set the dry rate and organized maintenance - the club didn't skim a single penny off the owner's rate so it was perfectly possible for an owner to make their plane pay, but our rates still be $10/hr cheaper than the FBO on the field). Occasionally, owners would have some stipulations about their aircraft, but generally these were checkout requirements (such as the Bonanza owner wanted 5 hours in type - additionally, the insurance required you have 10 hours in type before taking passengers, and the owner was quite happy for you to go from 5-10 hours solo). Overall, I think this structure of club worked well. We only kicked one member out in the 20 years the club has been around. The whole 3000' runway is asinine whether it comes from an FBO or a club, especially applied to planes like C172s which can be landed and stopped *with no short field techniques at all* and without even using the brakes in half that distance. Any newly minted PPL should be able to land and stop on a 3000' runway in a C172 or Cherokee without using the brakes. It's a good job that clubs etc. don't try that rule here as most GA fields in the British Isles are grass and under 3000'! -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Y'all,
Over 35 years in a club and I have found that the ethics of the board and officers are critical. By laws can be written and re-written to provide 'required' flight time for a favored few. Expense to my club is now over $500 per month. On short notice bylaws may be re-written to require anyone running for office to have attended all meetings of the previous year.. By-laws may make it possible for removal from the club without cause. Member may be informed (by phone) that attendence to club meetings will cause removal. Waiting list is a joke. Membership selection is based on income over all other considerations other than nepotism. Maintenance officers may lie to pilots by telling them it is o.k. to fly an aircraft that the FAA would call un-airworthy. The critical element is that the pilot is putting his license at risk. The insurance company will void any insurance claims from such an aircraft. Depending on legal interpretations the total membership can be liable for any accident far beyond the value of the club. Been there, seen that. Gene Whitt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SoCal Flying Club | Kelly Bakst | Piloting | 0 | September 13th 04 09:06 PM |
Interesting Resume (V Long) | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 24 | September 13th 04 06:44 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |