A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Diesel aircraft engines and are the light jets pushing out the twins?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 17th 04, 11:31 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport wrote:
About the size of the Caravan 900hp+


Mike
MU-2


According to the Cessna website, the current Caravan is 675hp.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove -spam-sux to reply.
  #2  
Old September 17th 04, 11:58 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Caravan has a 940hp engine flat rated to 675hp. Turbines are typically
flat rated so that the engine can make rated power to reasonable altitudes
and temperatures without having to design the gearbox for the full
thermodynamic horsepower. To keep the comparison with piston engines apples
to apples you need to use thermodynamic ratings.

http://www.pwc.ca/en/3_0/3_0http://w.../3_0_2_1_2.asp

To put some numbers on things, the engines in my MU-2 have a specific fuel
consumption of .55lb/hp/hr and a piston engine is about .45 and diesels can
be under .40. Huge (ship) diesels can be under .30. Compare your model
aircraft engines with the TFE731-60 used on the Falcon 900EX which uses
..405lb/lb thrust/hr

Mike
MU-2


wrote in message
...
In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport wrote:
About the size of the Caravan 900hp+


Mike
MU-2


According to the Cessna website, the current Caravan is 675hp.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove -spam-sux to reply.



  #3  
Old September 21st 04, 06:32 AM
Ernie Ganas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike,

TCM IO-520/550's running LOP are about .39-.40 BPSC according to the GAMI
folks, the SEMA engine is about .33-.35 from their specs. At 70K for their
engine conversion and the cost of JetA being within 10% of the cost of 100LL
at most GA airports I ageree with you and don't think we'll see a lot
diesel's in the near future.

The Diamond Twin really impresses me, can' t wait for an independent
(non-Flying or other slick mag) pilot report to see how it really does.

Ernie
BE36 E-160
KDVO


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
k.net...
The Caravan has a 940hp engine flat rated to 675hp. Turbines are typically
flat rated so that the engine can make rated power to reasonable altitudes
and temperatures without having to design the gearbox for the full
thermodynamic horsepower. To keep the comparison with piston engines
apples to apples you need to use thermodynamic ratings.

http://www.pwc.ca/en/3_0/3_0http://w.../3_0_2_1_2.asp

To put some numbers on things, the engines in my MU-2 have a specific fuel
consumption of .55lb/hp/hr and a piston engine is about .45 and diesels
can be under .40. Huge (ship) diesels can be under .30. Compare your
model aircraft engines with the TFE731-60 used on the Falcon 900EX which
uses .405lb/lb thrust/hr

Mike
MU-2


wrote in message
...
In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport
wrote:
About the size of the Caravan 900hp+


Mike
MU-2


According to the Cessna website, the current Caravan is 675hp.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove -spam-sux to reply.






  #4  
Old September 21st 04, 10:03 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ernie Ganas" wrote

The Diamond Twin really impresses me, can' t wait for an independent
(non-Flying or other slick mag) pilot report to see how it really does.

Ernie


I hope they have a better single engine service ceiling than what they were
claiming during prototyping. I can't remember, but AIRC, it was less than 3
thousand feet.
--
Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.766 / Virus Database: 513 - Release Date: 9/17/2004


  #5  
Old September 22nd 04, 10:18 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Morgans,

I can't remember, but AIRC, it was less than 3
thousand feet.


http://www.diamond-air.at/en/products/DA42/facts.htm

FL180. But anything to bad-mouth a product not from the USofA, right?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #6  
Old September 22nd 04, 11:06 AM
Paul Sengupta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Morgans,

I can't remember, but AIRC, it was less than 3
thousand feet.


http://www.diamond-air.at/en/products/DA42/facts.htm

FL180. But anything to bad-mouth a product not from the USofA, right?


He said single engine...

Paul


  #7  
Old September 22nd 04, 02:00 PM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul,

He said single engine...


Oops! My bad....

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #9  
Old September 18th 04, 12:37 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...
In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport wrote:
About the size of the Caravan 900hp+


Mike
MU-2


According to the Cessna website, the current Caravan is 675hp.

--
Jim Pennino


What is the useful load left over of a Caravan, after you fuel it for a 900
NM plus reserves trip?

Oh, also, how about stopping the cross posting. Pick one.
--
Jim in NC


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.762 / Virus Database: 510 - Release Date: 9/13/2004


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.