![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In reality, you need to file an IFR flight plan with a FSS; you then get
your code either on the ground or in the air BEFORE you penetrate the TFR; and you can just fly VFR, wx permitting of course. You don't have to get and fly a clearance. Just do what ATC tells you to do when you're in the TFR. This is based on my experiences. Ray On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:12:47 GMT, Joe Johnson wrote: Returning to HPN from the northwest last night, approach cleared me to the Tappan Zee bridge, then to HPN as usual. I said "unable, the TZ bridge is inside the TFR" and proposed a route to the Carmel VOR, then direct HPN, which the controller accepted. This is the relevant part of http://tfr.faa.gov/tfr/jsp/save_page...l_4_9872.html: PART B. OUTER AREA, PROCEDURES FOR AIRCRAFT OPERATING WITHIN THE NY CLASS B TFR FROM 7 NMR TO THE CLASS B 20 NM BOUNDARY, FROM THE SURFACE, UP TO BUT NOT INCLUDING FL180, ARE LISTED BELOW: 1. FIXED WING AIRCRAFT SHALL BE ON AN ACTIVE IFR OR VFR FLIGHT PLAN FILED WITH AN AFSS. 2. ALL AIRCRAFT SHALL SQUAWK A DISCRETE TRANSPONDER CODE ASSIGNED BY ATC. ALL AIRCRAFT SHALL SQUAWK THE DISCRETE TRANSPONDER CODE PRIOR TO DEPARTURE AND AT ALL TIMES WITHIN THE TFR. IN THE EVENT OF A TRANSPONDER FAILURE, THE PILOT SHALL ADVISE ATC AND ATC WILL PROVIDE THE MOST DIRECT COURSE TO OUTSIDE THE LATERAL LIMITS OF THE TFR. 3. ALL AIRCRAFT MUST REMAIN IN TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATIONS WITH ATC. 4. FIXED WING OPERATIONS ARE LIMITED TO AIRCRAFT ARRIVING OR DEPARTING LOCAL AIRFIELDS. AIRCRAFT MAY NOT LOITER. The TZ bridge is within the outer area mentioned above. I had a transponder code (point 2 above) assigned by approach, but was not on an active flight plan filed with and AFSS(point 1 above). Questions: 1. Is my interpretation that I was not authorized to fly to the bridge correct, or is a transponder code assigned by ATC tantamount to a flight plan? 2. If I had flown to the bridge and been intercepted, would it have been an adequate defense that approach ATC had cleared me to that location? -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ray Bengen wrote: In reality, you need to file an IFR flight plan with a FSS; you then get your code either on the ground or in the air BEFORE you penetrate the TFR; and you can just fly VFR, wx permitting of course. You don't have to get and fly a clearance. Just do what ATC tells you to do when you're in the TFR. With the NY TRACON, at least, you file a VFR flight plan and you tell them that it's for the purposes of the TFR (you don't need the search procedure if you fail to show up). They will take care of it from there. My understanding is that they enter it as a pseudo-IFR flight plan to get it in the system, but that's their problem/solution. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Question Medical | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 04 05:12 AM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
T Tail question | Paul Austin | Military Aviation | 7 | September 23rd 03 06:05 PM |