A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

In his own words - BWB and the OMABP



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 7th 04, 02:07 AM
RobertR237
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


When I get that Lancair Legacy done in a couple years, you are my
first invitation to come out and take a ride at 300 mph!

Just bought my O-550 today. Whaa-Hoooo That baby is gonna go with
the super charger on it at flight level 250! I just hope I don't die
of old age before I finish it and fly it. But, considering that the
thing is a "Lick and Stick" it ought to go fast. I mean after two
weeks at the factory using their jigs, you bring home a glued together
fuselage and the wings are closed. So, you just lick it and stick it
and the body is almost there. No 20,000 rivets. Eat your heart out
Amp Meter and you other RV builders! Ha!

BWB


At least, I KNOW every damned rivet and I KNEW that it
wouldn't fall apart at altitude. Do you have the same
confidence that the composite "glue" will do the same??


Hell, I don't know about BWB but I would have every bit as much confidence that
the composite will hold together just as well and just as long as your rivets.

How cold is it at altitude? What happens when you get a
lightening strike on that fuselage? With the resistance of
the composite fuselage you'll get a tremendous voltage drop
across it when the lightening strikes. And Power equals
voltage drop times current. How do you think you'll like
dissipating a megawatthour of energy in that small area??

I'll stick to metal airplanes... Lightening hits them and
simply flows through with little or no voltage drop...

John


Wow, in the total scheme of things, how many planes are hit by lightning? If
you are that leary of flying and lightning, I would suggest you stay on the
ground.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)

  #2  
Old July 7th 04, 02:58 AM
Badwater Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Wow, in the total scheme of things, how many planes are hit by lightning? If
you are that leary of flying and lightning, I would suggest you stay on the
ground.


Bob Reed


I hate to say this about my close friend John. But, he does stay on
the ground. He hasn't flown in the 8 years I've known him. I wish he
would build another high performance airplane and get us butt up
again. He's a great guy and a hero in my eyes for many reasons. I
just wish he flew more. I know he dreams about it or he wouldn't be
here.

John, get your ass back into the sky buddy. Time is running out. We
are growing old at an exponential rate. Take advantage of the next 10
years because 10 years from now you might not be able to get a medical
or some other sinister thing like that.

I think we here in RAH all ought to have a lynch-mob mentality and get
Amp Meter up in the air again. Let's pick on him collectively!

In fact, John, if you want to come down here, I'll get you on the
insurance of the RV-6 I used to own and you can fly the **** out of
it. I know you are building a house now and don't have time. But in
a year or so when that's done, you are welcome to fly anything I have
access to just so I can get you back up.

Now do it or be square!

BWB
  #3  
Old July 7th 04, 03:12 AM
John Ammeter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 01:58:34 GMT,
(Badwater Bill) wrote:


Wow, in the total scheme of things, how many planes are hit by lightning? If
you are that leary of flying and lightning, I would suggest you stay on the
ground.


Bob Reed


I hate to say this about my close friend John. But, he does stay on
the ground. He hasn't flown in the 8 years I've known him. I wish he
would build another high performance airplane and get us butt up
again. He's a great guy and a hero in my eyes for many reasons. I
just wish he flew more. I know he dreams about it or he wouldn't be
here.

John, get your ass back into the sky buddy. Time is running out. We
are growing old at an exponential rate. Take advantage of the next 10
years because 10 years from now you might not be able to get a medical
or some other sinister thing like that.

I think we here in RAH all ought to have a lynch-mob mentality and get
Amp Meter up in the air again. Let's pick on him collectively!

In fact, John, if you want to come down here, I'll get you on the
insurance of the RV-6 I used to own and you can fly the **** out of
it. I know you are building a house now and don't have time. But in
a year or so when that's done, you are welcome to fly anything I have
access to just so I can get you back up.

Now do it or be square!

BWB



The house we're building already has a 24 x 36 foot shop.
My plan is to build a low and slow high wing stump jumper as
soon as we move in. I loved the feel of the RV-6. It flew
as if it was a part of me. But, now, I want an airplane
that I can land (and take off..) from our family ranch. I
want a plane that I can spot friends homes and the deer that
are ready to "harvest".

I also want an airplane that is able to fly so slow that I
can 'hover' over the nudist camp...

John
  #4  
Old July 7th 04, 03:16 AM
Anthony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I also want an airplane that is able to fly so slow that I
can 'hover' over the nudist camp...

John


That sounds like a Feisler Storch.

Tony


  #5  
Old July 12th 04, 08:14 AM
Del Rawlins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In Anthony wrote:

I also want an airplane that is able to fly so slow that I
can 'hover' over the nudist camp...

John


That sounds like a Feisler Storch.


They don't have the near-helicopter performance of a Storch, but the
Bearhawk (4 seat) or the Bearhawk Patrol (2 seat tandem) have good STOL
performance, high load carrying capability, and much better top speed.
I was recently given a ride in an O-540 powered Bearhawk and even with
all of the owner's camping gear still in the back the performance was
just amazing.

----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins-
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
  #6  
Old July 9th 04, 02:33 AM
Badwater Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



The house we're building already has a 24 x 36 foot shop.
My plan is to build a low and slow high wing stump jumper as
soon as we move in. I loved the feel of the RV-6. It flew
as if it was a part of me. But, now, I want an airplane
that I can land (and take off..) from our family ranch. I
want a plane that I can spot friends homes and the deer that
are ready to "harvest".

I also want an airplane that is able to fly so slow that I
can 'hover' over the nudist camp...

John



This post put a tear in my eye John. I hope you do it.

Bill
  #7  
Old July 9th 04, 12:30 PM
ChuckSlusarczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

now, I want an airplane
that I can land (and take off..) from our family ranch. I
want a plane that I can spot friends homes and the deer that
are ready to "harvest".

I also want an airplane that is able to fly so slow that I
can 'hover' over the nudist camp...

John


Well John sounds like you need a CGS Hawk ,I've spotted deer,taken off on short
unimproved fields and checked out the topless gals at the private lake here in
Ohio. Lets talk :-) Take off in less than 200" landings the same cruise at 70
-90 mph depending on engine and slow fly at 35 or so with the flaps down. Got
single and 2 place.....End of obvious commercial

See ya

Chuck (no place to land at private lake with possible engine trouble) S

  #8  
Old July 9th 04, 03:02 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote

Well John sounds like you need a CGS Hawk . Take off in less than 200"


End of obvious commercial

See ya

Chuck


Damn, Chuck! A 200 inch takeoff? What have you done to the new models, to
be able to do that? ;-o)
--
Jim in NC (who loves those 40 mph winds, straight down the runway) g


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 7/5/2004


  #9  
Old July 9th 04, 07:34 PM
ChuckSlusarczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Morgans says...


"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote

Well John sounds like you need a CGS Hawk . Take off in less than 200"


End of obvious commercial

See ya

Chuck


Damn, Chuck! A 200 inch takeoff? What have you done to the new models, to
be able to do that? ;-o)
--
Jim in NC (who loves those 40 mph winds, straight down the runway) g


OOPs I meant 200 "FEET " LOL!!! Actually 200 inches is 16.67 feet and I bet in a
30 mph wind with full flaps ... :-)

See ya

Chuck S

  #10  
Old July 10th 04, 12:17 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Morgans wrote:

"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote

Well John sounds like you need a CGS Hawk . Take off in less than 200"



End of obvious commercial

See ya

Chuck



Damn, Chuck! A 200 inch takeoff? What have you done to the new models, to
be able to do that? ;-o)


The JATO option, obviously. Do we have to 'splain every detail to you? :-)

Matt

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.