A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

aeromedical optometrist (if there is such a thing)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 04, 07:40 PM
Bob Clough
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I met w/ an optometrist yesterday who stated that progressive lenses aren't
recommended for pilots cuz they blur peripheral vision. She pointed me to
either readers, classic "lined" bifocals, or bifocal contact lenses (a
couple of varieties) to solve my problem of arms being too short to read
charts.

Bob


"Barry" wrote in message news
Thanks for offering. The instruments seem slightly out of focus but

distance
out to horizon is ok. Reading glasses help but not well. Transition is

a
slight problem when going from horizon sight picture to instruments.

Also, a
1.0 or 1.25 reader solves the problem with focus on instruments but I

need a
1.5 or higher to set the altimeter or to read the compass card (and

probably
the flight computer when I get to use it. Last week I took a lesson that
started just before sundown because the tower held us short for nearly

15
minutes. I wore 1.0 readers. Forty-five minutes later during civil
twilight, reading the instruments was difficult. Forget about reading my
checklist.


You might try progressive lenses. I'm near-sighted, and after a few years

of
having more and more trouble with near vision (though always meeting the

FAA
standard) finally gave in and got progressive bifocals. It felt a little
strange for the first couple of weeks, but now I automatically tilt my

head as
needed to see clearly.




  #2  
Old September 26th 04, 12:07 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:40:26 GMT, "Bob Clough"
wrote:

I met w/ an optometrist yesterday who stated that progressive lenses aren't
recommended for pilots cuz they blur peripheral vision.


Then "Smart Seg" is the way to go. You get a line, like any
oldfashioned bifocal, but the side vision remains unchanged.

I don't think she meant peripheral vision, though! Peripheral vision
is always blurred! Perhaps she meant shooting a side glance out of the
edge of the lens. It's true that with a conventional bifocal, the
glass to the outside is the distance Rx. This is useful when you're
looking down at something on the floor.

Remember this: any change you make to your vision, whether it's
glasses for the first time, or bifocals or progressive lenses, will
become second nature in a very short time.

(Just don't do what my father did, when he mounted onto a scafolding
his first day at work after getting bifocals. He glanced down, stepped
between two planks, and got a hernia recovering.)

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance Piloting 18 March 4th 05 07:22 PM
Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance Owning 14 January 19th 05 10:17 PM
Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance Military Aviation 9 August 31st 04 11:01 PM
SUV thing Fastglasair Home Built 4 July 12th 03 05:32 AM
Big Bertha Thing blogs Tony Lance Piloting 0 July 2nd 03 11:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.