![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich S. wrote:
wrote in message ... Hmm, eat the right foods in moderation, don't snack on sugar filled junk, don't drink carbonated sugar water (soda), excersize and you will weigh what you should weigh for your height. This is news? I remember a doctor being interviewed on 60 Minutes some five years ago, he was a cardiologist and had studied obesity and obese people and their eating/ excersize habits. He thought he knew how most overweight people got that way. His radical revelation was that obese people just ate too much, ate the wrong stuff and didn't excersize enough. He shrugged, said "sorry, but it's really that simple." He added that the percentage of folks who actually had some sort of glandular problem causing them to be overweight was so miniscule, it could hardly be tabulated. Hmm.......... Perhaps it is him who is simple. Or outdated. I suggest reading recent literature on gene effects of obesity. There is a good layman's article in (IIRC) Reader's Digest last month on this subject. It is more complicated than simply lack of will power or eating habits. Rich "It ain't my fault!" S. ![]() So you are saying that our genetics have changed dramatically in the last 40 years? I don't buy it. Our rate of obesity has increased dramatically in the lat 40 years, but I don't think we've mutated all that much genetically. Then again, I'm not a geneticist... :-) Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
So you are saying that our genetics have changed dramatically in the last 40 years? I don't buy it. Our rate of obesity has increased dramatically in the lat 40 years, but I don't think we've mutated all that much genetically. Then again, I'm not a geneticist... :-) Matt That's not quite correct - at least according to my doctor. They call it Factor-X diabetes. I have hardly any genetic risk for diabetes, but have developed Type-1 anyway. The cause is generally explained as the massive amount of sugar and alcohol that have been introduced into our diets since about 1940 or so. The doctor prescribed an oral med (Metformin HCL, in my case) and over the first year I shed 50 pounds with very little change in diet or activity. I'm now 196 pounds, which is not too bad at 6'3. If you are overweight (and by media reports, most of us are seriously so), might be wise to get screened for Diabetes. Especially if your diet has included a lot of soda or alcohol... Richard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:11:16 GMT, Richard Lamb
wrote: Matt Whiting wrote: So you are saying that our genetics have changed dramatically in the last 40 years? I don't buy it. Our rate of obesity has increased dramatically in the lat 40 years, but I don't think we've mutated all that much genetically. Then again, I'm not a geneticist... :-) Matt That's not quite correct - at least according to my doctor. They call it Factor-X diabetes. I have hardly any genetic risk for diabetes, but have developed Type-1 anyway. type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease. the beta cells in the pancreas are a type of secreting nerve cell different from those around them. the immune system occasionally gets it wrong and removes them. in australia type 1 means no pilots licence but in the usa you have about 250 pilots who manage the problem in flight so well through continual monitoring that they have their licences. amazing to see that after the hoover fiasco. Stealth Pilot |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stealth Pilot" wrote in australia type 1 means no pilots licence but in the usa you have about 250 pilots who manage the problem in flight so well through continual monitoring that they have their licences. amazing to see that after the hoover fiasco. Stealth Pilot I have a niece that has type one. It is amazing, the advances that have been made. She has a pump that lets a controlled constant dose of insulin into her body, then before every meal, she checks her blood, then calculates what she will be eating, takes into account where her sugar level was, then programs the pump to release just the amount needed for the meal. She is almost always right on the right blood sugar level. -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 7/5/2004 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: So you are saying that our genetics have changed dramatically in the last 40 years? I don't buy it. Our rate of obesity has increased dramatically in the lat 40 years, but I don't think we've mutated all that much genetically. Then again, I'm not a geneticist... :-) Matt That's not quite correct - at least according to my doctor. They call it Factor-X diabetes. I have hardly any genetic risk for diabetes, but have developed Type-1 anyway. The cause is generally explained as the massive amount of sugar and alcohol that have been introduced into our diets since about 1940 or so. The doctor prescribed an oral med (Metformin HCL, in my case) and over the first year I shed 50 pounds with very little change in diet or activity. I'm now 196 pounds, which is not too bad at 6'3. If you are overweight (and by media reports, most of us are seriously so), might be wise to get screened for Diabetes. Especially if your diet has included a lot of soda or alcohol... Richard I don't understand your point. You say I'm not correct, but then what you say pretty much supports what I said, that it isn't genetics that is to blame for our obesity problem in America. Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
Richard Lamb wrote: Matt Whiting wrote: So you are saying that our genetics have changed dramatically in the last 40 years? I don't buy it. Our rate of obesity has increased dramatically in the lat 40 years, but I don't think we've mutated all that much genetically. Then again, I'm not a geneticist... :-) Matt That's not quite correct - at least according to my doctor. They call it Factor-X diabetes. I have hardly any genetic risk for diabetes, but have developed Type-1 anyway. The cause is generally explained as the massive amount of sugar and alcohol that have been introduced into our diets since about 1940 or so. The doctor prescribed an oral med (Metformin HCL, in my case) and over the first year I shed 50 pounds with very little change in diet or activity. I'm now 196 pounds, which is not too bad at 6'3. If you are overweight (and by media reports, most of us are seriously so), might be wise to get screened for Diabetes. Especially if your diet has included a lot of soda or alcohol... Richard I don't understand your point. You say I'm not correct, but then what you say pretty much supports what I said, that it isn't genetics that is to blame for our obesity problem in America. Matt Sorry Matt. I was just saying that I thought genetics have _not_ changed. But I see that was your point as well. Richard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vernon Peckham's letter about Jerry Rooks | RH | Home Built | 1 | May 11th 04 03:02 PM |