![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... "Dan Luke" wrote: I suppose so. I always have this feeling my old CFII is sitting in the right seat, shaking his head when I don't do something "by the book." Single-pilot IFR is all about task prioritization. Take care of the important stuff, and don't waste time on the **** that doesn't matter. As long as you stay in the protected airspace, nobody cares what your holds look like, or how perfectly timed the legs are. From an ATC stand-point, most controllers certainly could care less what a hold looks like when flown. Personally, I just want you to maintain assigned altitude and meander in orbit somewhere over the fix in the general direction assigned. We controllers get really conservative around holding patterns, and a tightly-flown pattern really doesn't matter. Likely, no one in ATC-land will even notice if you nail the turns and the times, because they are looking at a lot of other stuff on the scope. The prudent controller will be using vertical separation below and above your protected airspace, and he/she will be adding a lot of extra lateral protection around your bubble too, just in case. Chip, ZTL |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chip Jones" wrote:
From an ATC stand-point, most controllers certainly could care less what a hold looks like when flown. Personally, I just want you to maintain assigned altitude and meander in orbit somewhere over the fix in the general direction assigned. One thing I have noticed is that while ATC doesn't seem to care much about where you go on the holding side of the fix, if you meander just a little bit PAST the holding fix, you're likely to get a call politely enquiring if you have any idea where the hell you are. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chip Jones wrote: From an ATC stand-point, most controllers certainly could care less what a hold looks like when flown. Personally, I just want you to maintain assigned altitude and meander in orbit somewhere over the fix in the general direction assigned. We controllers get really conservative around holding patterns, and a tightly-flown pattern really doesn't matter. Likely, no one in ATC-land will even notice if you nail the turns and the times, because they are looking at a lot of other stuff on the scope. The prudent controller will be using vertical separation below and above your protected airspace, and he/she will be adding a lot of extra lateral protection around your bubble too, just in case. And unless you are in a charted holding pattern the idea of a protected side and unprotected side is pretty funny too. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 03:09 AM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations | David B. Cole | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | February 24th 04 07:51 PM |
Long Range Spitfires??? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 3 | September 9th 03 10:05 PM |