![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This means that an instrument training XC trip, which is NOT on an instrument flight plan (you don't have an instrument rating yet so you can't file IFR as PIC) but is under the hood with an instructor as safety pilot, can be logged as PIC XC.......so you can make the same time do double duty. Well, sort of. You need to make this arrangement beforehand, because LOGGING PIC time and BEING PIC are two different animals, kind of like dolphin (the kind you eat) and dolphin (as in Flipper) are two different animals. You can =log= PIC time as a non-instrument-rated private pilot, even under an IFR flight plan that your instructor files, even though the instructor must =be= PIC(*). However, you can =not= use this time as the time required under 61.65(d)(1). Though it's in your logbook as PIC (sole manipulator, or "Hands On Time"), you were not PIC (Top Dog) on that flight. I know you didn't claim this to be true; I state it for completeness. You can also log PIC time if you are flying under VFR, under the hood, with the instructor also acting as safety pilot, irrespective of who =is= PIC. This is the case I believe you were referring to, and yes, if you and your instructor agree that =you= (the student) are to be Top Dog on that flight, then the time counts towards the time required under 61.65(d)(1). It might be the case that you need to do this (for example, if the instructor's medical has lapsed, I believe she can still give you required instruction, she just can't be Top Dog, though this would require another current pilot in the back to act as safety pilot, which is a required crewmember under the circumstances, which brings us back to the pathological case referred to earlier). On the other hand, it is also possible that the (current) instructor elects to act as Top Dog (and =be= PIC), in which case though you could log HOT time (PIC time) you could not use it as the time required under 61.65(d)(1). It might even be necessary (for example, if your own medical has lapsed, though I think that in that case you might not be able to log the time at all; 61.23 does not list "receiving flight instruction" as an exception) So, yes, you can make the time do double duty, but you need to read the regs carefully. Remember, HOT time doesn't make you Top Dog, and being Top Dog doesn't make you HOT. Jose == (*) OK, there are pathological cases where a third person sitting in the back could BE PIC, for now let's not go there.. oh, never mind, we already did. ![]() -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
Tips on Getting Your Instrument Rating Sooner and at Lower Cost | Fred | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | October 19th 04 07:31 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |