![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Teacherjh" wrote in message
... [...] I'm not sure about film choice though. 100 ASA gives better grain, but you have to use a slower shutter speed. 400 lets you use a faster shutter. I haven't done tests (and I don't do it professionally) so I'm not sure which is better. For what it's worth, last winter I tried out a (new to me) film Kodak makes, that they call "High Definition". I found that, true to their claims, it had significantly less grain than the same speed film of different manufacturer, or even one of Kodak's other types. I only tried it because I can't find their "Royal Gold" type anymore; as near as I can tell from their web site, they don't make it anymore. Anyway, I used to shoot 200, as a decent compromise between grain and speed, and now I always use the 400 Kodak HD film. That said, if you are shooting through clear windows (the ones in my plane are tinted, and cut the light a bit...and of course, require color correcting the photos later), and are shooting a brightly lit subject, and using 100 ASA film is an option, that will give you the best results. As the light is reduced however, what you lose in grain by using a faster film, you make up for by not having a blurry photo. ![]() If I were shooting professionally, I'd probably invest in a gyrostabilized mount, and shoot medium format. ![]() Canon's optical stabilizing lenses. As an amateur, I don't shoot enough frames to make it worth switching film according to lighting, thus the compromise film. Of course, these days, I'm shooting more and more digital anyway. Even my little 5 megapixel Olympus turns out pretty great pictures. Once I've got a digital SLR, I probably won't go back to film. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Duniho wrote: Anyway, I used to shoot 200, as a decent compromise between grain and speed, and now I always use the 400 Kodak HD film. Thanks for the report. I gotta get me some of that. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airshow Action Photo Gallery update | Peter Steehouwer | Home Built | 0 | November 16th 04 09:52 PM |
Airshow Action Photo Gallery update | Peter Steehouwer | Military Aviation | 0 | June 6th 04 06:45 PM |
Airshow Action Photo Gallery update | Peter Steehouwer | Military Aviation | 0 | June 6th 04 09:53 AM |
Airshow Action Photo Gallery update | Peter Steehouwer | Home Built | 0 | June 6th 04 09:53 AM |
Ultralights photo | Mirco Landini | Home Built | 4 | September 17th 03 06:08 AM |