A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aviation fuel - price of crude...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 8th 04, 09:52 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

" gdbutler at bellsouth.net wrote in message
.. .
I say we worry about the future in the future and worry about today today


Unfortunately, in spite of the incredibly obvious problems with such a
short-sighted attitude, there are many people who, amazingly enough, agree
with that sentiment.

In truth, you can avoid major problems in the future by worrying a little
today about the problems. If you wait until the future, tiny problems turn
into incredibly large problems.

There are countless examples in history of this, but a recent example would
be the whole "Year 2000" computer software issue. According to your
philosophy, we should have waited until all the software broke, and then fix
it rather than going through all the software ahead of time and making sure
things work when the date rolls over. Furthermore, that example shows very
clearly that the long-term cost is much higher when one doesn't plan ahead;
it would have been minimally expensive to have written the software in the
first place without that limitation, and it cost billions of dollars to fix
it after the fact.

In aviation, one need only look at the benefits of keeping an airplane
properly maintained, rather than waiting for things to break. It is much
more costly to fix things after they break, even if you suffer no greater
indignity than to have to cancel a flight. Heaven forbid something should
break in flight...the costs are guaranteed to be even higher, and could even
involve injury or death.

So, you can go around being ignorant about the concept of planning for the
future if you like, but anyone with any common sense understands what an
idiotic attitude that is.

Pete


  #2  
Old October 9th 04, 12:25 AM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message


There are countless examples in history of this, but a recent example
would be the whole "Year 2000" computer software issue. ... it would have
been
minimally expensive to have written the software in the first place
without that limitation, and it cost billions of dollars to fix it
after the fact.


Um.... How much Y2K work did you do?

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Owning 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals Mergatroide Aviation Marketplace 1 January 13th 04 08:26 PM
Fuel dump switch in homebuilt Jay Home Built 36 December 5th 03 02:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.