![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:58:27 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: "Peter" wrote in message .. . You meet the night cross country requirement with either flight listed above. There's no requirement for a solo night cross country of any distance in the regs. If you've done 10 night takeoffs and landings you meet the requirements for that part of the reg. My reading of the first paragraph above is that *both* (i) and (ii) are required, and the word "night" does apply to both (i) and (ii). Yes, it does. I assume that Peter Clark was not implying that the XC flight required by 61.109(2)(i) is not required to be done at night; rather, I read his statement to (correctly) mean that there's no *SOLO* night XC requirement. The only night XC requirement specifically requires an instructor to be on board. Yep, I stand corrected in that the 3 hours night training "that includes" would mandate the cross country be part of that 3 hours and thus logged as dual received wouldn't it. So the extra solo night cross country wouldn't be useful for anything under this part. In a UK-registered aircraft and/or in the UK, of course. AFAIK, the UK license doesn't make you legal in the US, flying a US-registered aircraft. It's not clear from any of your posts which certificate (the UK license or the US student pilot certificate) you're using as the basis for legality for the various flights you're making, or where those flights were made. If it is a standard UK certificate, wouldn't his easier path be getting a US PPL based on foreign cert, a-la 61.75? Anyone, American or not, can get an FAA Private Pilot Certificate without doing those. However, they will have a "no night flying" restriction on their certificate. Actually, I believe you might be mistaken on this one - the only night exemption is I can see is 61.110 which appears to apply to Alaska only. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Clark" wrote in message
... [...] If it is a standard UK certificate, wouldn't his easier path be getting a US PPL based on foreign cert, a-la 61.75? You'd think. But each pilot has their own circumstance. I'll take it as granted that if a pilot feels it's easier to go through the "long form" certification process than to convert a UK certificate, then it is. ![]() Or perhaps in spite of all that aeronautical experience, he doesn't actually hold a convertable certificate. I don't know. Actually, I believe you might be mistaken on this one - the only night exemption is I can see is 61.110 which appears to apply to Alaska only. Hmmm...interesting. Either my memory is too fuzzy, or this is yet another example of a subtle change that occurred in 1997 (if I even have the year correct), and which I've failed to note. They appear to have kept in the general (non-Alaska) exception for gyroplanes, powered parachutes, and weight-shift-control aircraft. I could swear that, at least at some point in my past, they permitted general "no night flying" certificates, even for pilots outside of Alaska. Of course, the main point is that to be allowed to fly at night, all holders of an FAA certificate obtained through the usual process must meet the night training requirements. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm...interesting. Either my memory is too fuzzy, or this is yet
another example of a subtle change that occurred in 1997 (if I even have the year correct), and which I've failed to note. They appear to have kept in the general (non-Alaska) exception for gyroplanes, powered parachutes, and weight-shift-control aircraft. I could swear that, at least at some point in my past, they permitted general "no night flying" certificates, even for pilots outside of Alaska. You're correct... but they closed that. Now, you can only get the exception living in Alaska, but I _think_ you have to go back and do the night stuff within six months or something like that. I had to do the night training (which led to a last-minute hop the night before my checkride to get the rest of the landings in) but it was all done with an instructor (the XC is a story for a different time...). I think they closed the exemption because too many people were trying to cheat the restriction and were having accidents (read: got themselves killed) so they figured it was better to make everyone do it even if they aren't going to use it again. Now, we can debate the intelligence of VFR XC's at night in single-engined airplanes for a long time to come... personally, I don't fly more than a few miles from my home area (where I can reconginze the landscape and airports, and can orient just by seeing Atlanta on the horizon) at night, and even then I won't go without a working, lighted GPS. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:13 PM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Piloting | 3 | August 9th 04 08:39 PM |