![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pacplyer" wrote If the tow line is long enough, the sag will have the pull vector at the tug nearly horizontal. Man, you're full of all kinds of good news. So the Russian AN-124 with dual tails may be better suited to prevent cable/tail fouling after all. pacplyer I figured on a split tail, all along. Need more tail for stability, anyway, for when orbit 1 is piggyback, plus when slingshot starts, we want plenty of positive yaw margin, as the line starts jerking the tow plane all over the sky. Spins suck, and plenty of rudder will help to pick up that low wing. That's the beauty, though. We can slap bigger engines on, and chop tail off and make separate tails, cause the whole thing is going to be EXPERIMENTAL!!! All we gotta do is convince the FAA that the thing is airworthy, then go play. Can we sacrifice a little weight on the tow, and put a section of the roof with explosive chord, and some ejection seats? I think I might want to leave with my jumpseat, if things head the wrong way! g -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.716 / Virus Database: 472 - Release Date: 7/6/2004 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Morgans" wrote
I figured on a split tail, all along. Need more tail for stability, anyway, for when orbit 1 is piggyback, plus when slingshot starts, we want plenty of positive yaw margin, as the line starts jerking the tow plane all over the sky. Spins suck, and plenty of rudder will help to pick up that low wing. That's the beauty, though. We can slap bigger engines on, and chop tail off and make separate tails, cause the whole thing is going to be EXPERIMENTAL!!! All we gotta do is convince the FAA that the thing is airworthy, then go play. Can we sacrifice a little weight on the tow, and put a section of the roof with explosive chord, and some ejection seats? I think I might want to leave with my jumpseat, if things head the wrong way! g No. I threw your jumpseat out to get the weight down to 400K! You're now sitting on the floor strapped down with some lightweight plastic Rosary beads, freezing to death since we stripped out all the insulation and heating ducts. An ejection seat wouldn't help you anyway since you couldn't pull the handles up with your frozen hands. Looks like you'll have to stick with the PIC (and he always goes down with the ship!) g Besides, I kinda get a warm fuzzy having the designers ride along with me. Years ago, the USAF was experiencing a bad rash of KC-135 accidents attributable to sloppy maintenance. The Wing Commander's answer to this was to require the crew chief signing off the work to ride in the aircraft for at least two legs. The maintenance problems immediately disappeared! pac "ride em on in to the ground" plyer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SoCal hangar space? | nauga | Home Built | 1 | May 6th 04 07:13 AM |
Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Air and Space Museum | Errol Groff | Home Built | 1 | February 26th 04 06:01 AM |
Xprize and tethered space station | Ray Toews | Home Built | 18 | December 16th 03 06:52 PM |
Rounded elevator counterbalance leading edges | Ed Wischmeyer | Home Built | 3 | October 16th 03 12:40 PM |
Air and Space Museum | Home Built | 1 | July 7th 03 06:58 PM |