![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pacplyer wrote:
Richard Lamb was right: "He's dead Jim, dead Jim, dead." So I guess we would have augered in with a stock 747-200. As Clint Eastwood used to say: "A man's just gotta-know his limitations." pacplyer Not THAT'S something that doesn't happen every day! The problem here is that the 747 was designed to LIFT stuff, not pull it. How about let's get a fresh napkin and work out what's really needed for the job? Richard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote in message ...
pacplyer wrote: Richard Lamb was right: "He's dead Jim, dead Jim, dead." So I guess we would have augered in with a stock 747-200. As Clint Eastwood used to say: "A man's just gotta-know his limitations." pacplyer Not THAT'S something that doesn't happen every day! The problem here is that the 747 was designed to LIFT stuff, not pull it. True enough. Even the NASA carrier transport, is a misapplication of the original design. What's attractive is that 747's are plentifully available and rather cheap compared to the cost of engineering a whole new machine of that size, or plunking down 20mil each launch over at Vandenberg. Buying an old 747-100 for 30 million and re-engining for another 60mil breaks even in about five launches. Also Burt and Co. could focus more on building the Orbiter itself. My guess is Burt may wind up building a massive "Black Knight" in the next couple of years (but what's that going to cost?) He could use the existing White Knight Cockpit design, but if he uses the same type of construction, the thing might be bigger than the Voyager! The 747 is about 199 lbs/ft wing loading IIRC. It has a massive Titanium spar that can do amazing lifting feats: and that's initially what we are after, to lift the thing to FL500. Turning it into a towplane after we get up there has never been done before, and that's why we will get bragging rights and free launch passes when it is done. ;-) One thing is for su the ability to escape all the costs and weight of the conventional first stage renting a government facility is the name of the game here. It costs Burt virtually NOTHING to use Mojave, since it is a public airport with no landing fees. How about let's get a fresh napkin and work out what's really needed for the job? Richard I was just doing a super wag (wild ass guess) exercise to convince myself that it was worth further inquiry. I think my friend at Scaled is right though. We cannot exceed a half inch average line width or we're doomed. In my mind we need to find something that average width that has a 200,000lb tensile strength. So Richard, here's a new stack of napkins, all I ask is that you explain the math to me. :-) Meanwhile, I'm on a search for unobtanium tether cable. pac |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SoCal hangar space? | nauga | Home Built | 1 | May 6th 04 07:13 AM |
Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Air and Space Museum | Errol Groff | Home Built | 1 | February 26th 04 06:01 AM |
Xprize and tethered space station | Ray Toews | Home Built | 18 | December 16th 03 06:52 PM |
Rounded elevator counterbalance leading edges | Ed Wischmeyer | Home Built | 3 | October 16th 03 12:40 PM |
Air and Space Museum | Home Built | 1 | July 7th 03 06:58 PM |