|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
October 22nd 04, 07:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:44:39 -0700, "David Brooks"
wrote: "Michael" wrote in message . com... Today is October 19, and... a *great* summary of the TSA IFR, but: snip The Category 3 rule says "A flight school may not provide training... to a *candidate*... unless...". The Category 4 rule (which covers BFRs) says "Prior to beginning recurrent training for a *candidate*..." Not sure I understand that. A BFR is not recurrent training. It is a flight review. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com -- David Brooks 
|
|
#2
October 22nd 04, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roger" wrote in message
... On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:44:39 -0700, "David Brooks" wrote: "Michael" wrote in message . com... Today is October 19, and... a *great* summary of the TSA IFR, but: snip The Category 3 rule says "A flight school may not provide training... to a *candidate*... unless...". The Category 4 rule (which covers BFRs) says "Prior to beginning recurrent training for a *candidate*..." Not sure I understand that. A BFR is not recurrent training. It is a flight review. The Definitions section of the Rule says, in pertinent part, "Recurrent training means periodic training required under 14 CFR part 61, 121,125, 135, or Subpart K of part 91", and that phrase embraces the Flight Review. The definition completely undermines the discussion of the term in the preamble. On the 20th, the TSA decided by fiat that they didn't mean it (basically, they reaffirmed the definition in the discussion section). -- David Brooks Believe!!!!!
|
|
#3
October 23rd 04, 01:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:05:31 -0700, "David Brooks"
wrote: "Roger" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:44:39 -0700, "David Brooks" wrote: "Michael" wrote in message . com... Today is October 19, and... a *great* summary of the TSA IFR, but: snip The Category 3 rule says "A flight school may not provide training... to a *candidate*... unless...". The Category 4 rule (which covers BFRs) says "Prior to beginning recurrent training for a *candidate*..." Not sure I understand that. A BFR is not recurrent training. It is a flight review. The Definitions section of the Rule says, in pertinent part, "Recurrent training means periodic training required under 14 CFR part 61, 121,125, 135, or Subpart K of part 91", and that phrase embraces the Flight Review. The way I read it and the way it was defined today it specifically excludes BFRs. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com The definition completely undermines the discussion of the term in the preamble. On the 20th, the TSA decided by fiat that they didn't mean it (basically, they reaffirmed the definition in the discussion section). -- David Brooks Believe!!!!!
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best airport to land at for Vancouver | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 2 | June 11th 04 04:27 AM |
| Where CAN you land your plane?? | ET | Piloting | 28 | February 27th 04 10:29 PM |
| Can the F-14 carry six AIM-54s and land on carrier? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 1 | October 29th 03 08:14 PM |
| Sharon's plan-Steal more land | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | October 15th 03 07:24 PM |
| How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |
Hybrid Mode
