![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Gig Giacona" wrote in message ... My point is that there is that the rule in no way restricts the transfer of knowledge. Which makes the rule even more ridiculous. Granted, most US instructors and schools will probably not offer instruction when it's specifically not being logged and used for a rating, but honestly, for the purpose of terrorism, that's not necessary. All it would take is one terrorist to learn how to fly, who could then teach everyone else how to fly. They don't even need to learn in the US. IMHO, the FAA ought to be the filter. FBOs aren't in the habit of renting airplanes to people who aren't pilots. The FAA ought to be doing whatever security check they and the TSA deem necessary, and preventing those who might not pass muster through the proposed rules from even getting a pilot certificate. Same thing for medical certificates. One of the most absurd things about these rules is that it puts the onus on thousands of independent professionals, all of whom will have varying ability to implement the rules, and none of whom ever intended to work for the US government as their security officers. Since it's the FAA and TSA who feel that they have the ability to correctly identify those who should and should not get flight training, they should be the ones to deal with the security checks (including verification of US citizenship). Of course, as Jose pointed out, you don't even need to go to a flight instructor to learn how to fly well enough to crash an airplane into a building. You can sit at your PC and accomplish the same thing, for a lot less money. The whole thing is just dumb. Pete YOu act as if having the "People" do the government's job for them is a new idea the TSA just came up with. If you are an employer you are required to do a lot of the government's work. Including the very same thing that is being required by the TSA... ie Make sure that people are either US citizens or authorized foriegn nationals. As an employer you are required to complete an I-9 form and it's requirements are pretty damn close to what is required under the new rule. Now that I think of it they ought to make the rule exactly the same. Hell, they could use the same damn form and save millions of dollars. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TSA rule - registration of freelance instructors | David Brooks | Piloting | 16 | October 12th 04 06:19 PM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
Proposed new flightseeing rule | C J Campbell | Piloting | 8 | November 15th 03 02:03 PM |
Proposed new flightseeing rule | C J Campbell | Home Built | 56 | November 10th 03 05:40 PM |
Hei polish moron also britain is going to breach eu deficit 3% rule | AIA | Military Aviation | 0 | October 24th 03 11:06 PM |