![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nobody wrote:
Ralph Nesbitt wrote: Seems to me if Airbus or any other manufacturer was aware AA was training it's pilots to fly/operate its products in a manner it was not engineered to be operated the manufacturer would be responsible for saying so "LOUD & CLEAR" in a manner that could not be construed as ambiguous. In principle, probably correct. But legally, wouldn't it be the FAA that would be in charge of ensuring that AA's training adheres to both its own as well as manufacturer's standards ? Airbus says it sent letters of concern to AA. Perhaps it should have sent those letters with a CC to the FAA and let the FAA ensure AA fixes the problem. Not sure Airbus has any authority on ist customers, but FAA has authority over US airlines. In the time-honored tradition of Usenet, you two are essentially jerking each other off speculating about this when you could very simply go read the primary sources. The letter from Airbus and Boeing to American Airlines, together with AA's chief pilot's rather arrogant response, are both in the public record of the investigation and can be read right he http://www.ntsb.gov/events/2001/AA58...its/239998.pdf Among other things, you'll see that the letter was signed not only by representatives of both airlines but by an FAA employee, who also was addressed in AA's reply. Clearly the FAA was aware of the training issues. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich Ahrens wrote in message m...
nobody wrote: Ralph Nesbitt wrote: Seems to me if Airbus or any other manufacturer was aware AA was training it's pilots to fly/operate its products in a manner it was not engineered to be operated the manufacturer would be responsible for saying so "LOUD & CLEAR" in a manner that could not be construed as ambiguous. In principle, probably correct. But legally, wouldn't it be the FAA that would be in charge of ensuring that AA's training adheres to both its own as well as manufacturer's standards ? Airbus says it sent letters of concern to AA. Perhaps it should have sent those letters with a CC to the FAA and let the FAA ensure AA fixes the problem. Not sure Airbus has any authority on ist customers, but FAA has authority over US airlines. In the time-honored tradition of Usenet, you two are essentially jerking each other off speculating about this when you could very simply go read the primary sources. The letter from Airbus and Boeing to American Airlines, together with AA's chief pilot's rather arrogant response, are both in the public record of the investigation and can be read right he http://www.ntsb.gov/events/2001/AA58...its/239998.pdf Among other things, you'll see that the letter was signed not only by representatives of both airlines but by an FAA employee, who also was addressed in AA's reply. Clearly the FAA was aware of the training issues. spoilsport. Oh wait, I was thinking that this might slow them down. Carry on. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Military: Pilot confusion led to F-16 crash that killed one pilot | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 1st 04 12:30 AM |
P-51C crash kills pilot | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 0 | June 30th 04 05:37 AM |
Fatal plane crash kills pilot in Ukiah CA | Randy Wentzel | Piloting | 1 | April 5th 04 05:23 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |