![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "GaryP" wrote in message om... (Jay) wrote in message om... Didn't the CD manufacturers get into hot water for setting what amounted to a Minimum Retail Price Policy? When an entire industry fixes prices that is illegal. But we are talking about 1 manufacturer setting prices, their prices. I am sorry but there is nothing wrong with that. Now if Garmin, Bendix King, Lowrance and whomever all met in a smoke filled room and set minimum prices for all GPS equipment that would be a different story. The notion of filing a class action law suit against Garmin for establishing a minimum retail price on their products is silly. No one forces a shop to sell Garmin. A shop chooses to do so willingly and in order to become an authorized retailer agrees to Garmin's retail policies. But it is still only Garmin setting prices on Garmin products. Now Garmin can increase prices up until they exclude enough of the market to cause a drop in overall sales and therefore loose profits. Still their choice! Right now there are enough people willing to buy Garmin products at Garmin's current retail prices to keep there production line busy. Until another company comes along with as good of a product or better to challenge Garmin it is not going to change. Garmin is in the business to make money not friends. Gary P Well, I think you're correct: Garmin selling to retailers and requiring them to set minimum retail prices as a condition of selling to them is not a violation of the Sherman Act. It's not a violation either for us who consider the practice to be sleazy to shun Garmin like it is a skunk either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|