A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flying on the step?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old November 1st 04, 03:08 PM
Dan Thomas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ...
" wrote in message
hlink.net...
I'm reading "Fate is the Hunter" and just read something interesting.
Gann
states that they would climb to 100 feet above their cruising altitude and
then descend the 100 feet back down. He called this "flying on the step."
He claims that it bought them a few more knots of airspeed.

Has anyone heard of this? Is it normal practice? Or is it one of those
practices that have been disproven?

Personally, I've never heard of this practice.


There is no "step", but the perception is probably based on achieving cruise
speed as quickly as possible after climbing to altitude. The most efficient
cruise occurs at a specific airspeed (in reality, angle of attack). Below
that speed the airplane is on the back side of the power curve, and faster
than that speed, the airplane is wasting fuel...

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the transports and bombers in WWII and
before tried to cruise at this "sweet spot" to maximize range. So, if they
climbed to altitude, set power at cruise, and waited for the airplane to
accelerate to cruise speed, they were in for a relatively long wait, and
(in theory, at least) would never quite get to the ideal speed. On the
other hand, if they accelerated to cruise speed before the power reduction
(whether by climbing through, then descending to the cruise altitude, or
just by flying to the desired altitude and keeping the power up), they could
pull power back to cruise and be right at the sweet spot from the get-go...

KB


We see pilots (trained elsewhere) that regularly level off at
altitude, pulling back the power as they do so, then trimming. The
airplane continues to accelerate and more fooling with trim ensues, as
well as with power (in fixed-pitch) since the RPM comes up as well.
This continues for a long time, with altitude fluctuations and other
distractions completely messing up the flight.
In the Flight Training Manual (Canadian) the proper sequence is
Attitude- Power-Trim, when levelling off. Get the airplane level,
leave the power in until cruise speed is reached, reduce it to the
power that will maintain that speed, and only then is the trim set. It
requires forward pressure which some don't like (some airplanes will
require some trim to keep it manageable), but after the proper process
is followed the airplane will hold altitude properly and the pilot can
get on to other things like navigating. I've sometimes made a student
sort out altitude excursions by rolling in lots of nose-up trim and
forcing him to hold it until the other things settle down.

Dan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 05:07 PM
Flying is Life - The Rest is Just Details Michael Piloting 55 February 7th 04 03:17 PM
Announcing THE book on airshow flying Dudley Henriques Piloting 11 January 9th 04 07:33 PM
Announcing THE book on airshow flying! Dudley Henriques Military Aviation 2 January 7th 04 03:41 PM
U.S. NAVY TO TEST FLYING SAUCER Larry Dighera Piloting 0 December 22nd 03 07:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.