![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ...
" wrote in message hlink.net... I'm reading "Fate is the Hunter" and just read something interesting. Gann states that they would climb to 100 feet above their cruising altitude and then descend the 100 feet back down. He called this "flying on the step." He claims that it bought them a few more knots of airspeed. Has anyone heard of this? Is it normal practice? Or is it one of those practices that have been disproven? Personally, I've never heard of this practice. There is no "step", but the perception is probably based on achieving cruise speed as quickly as possible after climbing to altitude. The most efficient cruise occurs at a specific airspeed (in reality, angle of attack). Below that speed the airplane is on the back side of the power curve, and faster than that speed, the airplane is wasting fuel... It wouldn't surprise me at all if the transports and bombers in WWII and before tried to cruise at this "sweet spot" to maximize range. So, if they climbed to altitude, set power at cruise, and waited for the airplane to accelerate to cruise speed, they were in for a relatively long wait, and (in theory, at least) would never quite get to the ideal speed. On the other hand, if they accelerated to cruise speed before the power reduction (whether by climbing through, then descending to the cruise altitude, or just by flying to the desired altitude and keeping the power up), they could pull power back to cruise and be right at the sweet spot from the get-go... KB We see pilots (trained elsewhere) that regularly level off at altitude, pulling back the power as they do so, then trimming. The airplane continues to accelerate and more fooling with trim ensues, as well as with power (in fixed-pitch) since the RPM comes up as well. This continues for a long time, with altitude fluctuations and other distractions completely messing up the flight. In the Flight Training Manual (Canadian) the proper sequence is Attitude- Power-Trim, when levelling off. Get the airplane level, leave the power in until cruise speed is reached, reduce it to the power that will maintain that speed, and only then is the trim set. It requires forward pressure which some don't like (some airplanes will require some trim to keep it manageable), but after the proper process is followed the airplane will hold altitude properly and the pilot can get on to other things like navigating. I've sometimes made a student sort out altitude excursions by rolling in lots of nose-up trim and forcing him to hold it until the other things settle down. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Flying is Life - The Rest is Just Details | Michael | Piloting | 55 | February 7th 04 03:17 PM |
Announcing THE book on airshow flying | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 11 | January 9th 04 07:33 PM |
Announcing THE book on airshow flying! | Dudley Henriques | Military Aviation | 2 | January 7th 04 03:41 PM |
U.S. NAVY TO TEST FLYING SAUCER | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | December 22nd 03 07:36 PM |