A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GPS Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 7th 04, 01:18 AM
The Weiss Family
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chuck" wrote in message
. ..
In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not certified
for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become
certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Thanks...

Chuck


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


You know what absolutely blows me away, and I can't wait until it becomes
the new standard?
With WAAS technology, you can fly a GPS approach into an airport that has NO
localizer, NO glideslope, etc.
The GPS will guide you in within 1 meter horizontally and vertically.
I'm only VFR, so some of my terminology may be off, but you get the idea.
How cool is that?

Seems to me that airports could save money because they wouldn't need to
maintain any radio navigation equipment anymore...

Adam
N7966L
Beech Super III


  #2  
Old November 7th 04, 03:15 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



You know what absolutely blows me away, and I can't wait until it becomes
the new standard?
With WAAS technology, you can fly a GPS approach into an airport that has NO
localizer, NO glideslope, etc.
The GPS will guide you in within 1 meter horizontally and vertically.
I'm only VFR, so some of my terminology may be off, but you get the idea.
How cool is that?

Seems to me that airports could save money because they wouldn't need to
maintain any radio navigation equipment anymore...

Adam
N7966L
Beech Super III



I'm just a private pilot too but dont forget the other parts of the
"instrument approach" structure. The electronic glidepath is only part
of it.

You have to have good lighting as well... if you plan on doing GPS
approaches down to the equivalent of a Cat 1 ILS you will still need to
have the lighting systems and runway markings that allow you to
transition to a visual environment at say 200 feet off the deck when you
break out of the soup. That means you still will need over 1200 linear
feet worth of land that can support it. Don't expect 200 ft minimums to
a 40 x 3000 strip of asphalt with 50 ft obstacles 100 ft from the end
across the fence.

WAAS is good stuff.. and it will open a lot of airports up, not to
mention allow glideslopes to EVERY runway that can support it (without
regard to ILS frequency congestion). But it wont be a hard IFR solution
to every field.

Dave

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime John Piloting 5 November 20th 03 09:40 PM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
Partnership Question Harry Gordon Owning 4 August 16th 03 11:23 PM
Got my ticket.... now what (the cross-country question) bdl Piloting 6 July 13th 03 02:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.