A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Forward thrust Q



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 9th 04, 04:54 AM
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Next time when you are flying commercial, take a look at the engine when
thrust reversers are applied. A deflector is used to reflect the exhaust
gases in the forward direction. You can clearly see the deflector being
activated if you sit near the engine nacelle. The blades do not change
rotation in most turbofan engines.

I am not too surprised about the chandelles. It is not a required
maneuver in the Canadian commercial checkride. But not knowing angle of
attack is surprising. This is basic concept everyone learns in primary
ground school. However, I am not sure how much aerodynamics a 737 pilot
has to know. At that level you are so far removed from the stick and
rudder flying that it is quite possible they have forgotten the basics.
I consider the heavy iron pilots as more like a systems manager than a
stick and rudder pilot.



(Ramapriya) wrote in
om:

Hi again,

I have for a colleague a 30-yr old former Air Canada 737 pilot who
doesn't take too kindly to questions of my kind When I asked him
recently about how forward thrust happens, he said that the engine
blades simply turn the other direction. With nothing to back up my
hunch, I still feel something amiss and implausible in what he said,
but if true, I must confess it represents fantastic braking within the
engine to first get the blades to a stop spinning, and next spin the
other way!

Could someone please confirm or deny what my colleague told me? That
pilot, by the way, says he has not heard of 'chandelles' or 'phugoids'
or even 'angle of attack'. Leaves me thinking that either Denker's
book contains non-standard terminology (unlikely) or Canadians use a
different set of terms (likely). OR he's feigning to keep me away (

Ramapriya



Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #2  
Old November 10th 04, 08:28 PM
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8 Nov 2004 22:54:58 -0600, Andrew Sarangan
wrote:

But not knowing angle of
attack is surprising. This is basic concept everyone learns in primary
ground school. However, I am not sure how much aerodynamics a 737 pilot
has to know. At that level you are so far removed from the stick and
rudder flying that it is quite possible they have forgotten the basics.
I consider the heavy iron pilots as more like a systems manager than a
stick and rudder pilot.


Opening can of worms and running, but don't a number of 737's have an
AOA meter?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thrust vs Shaft Horse Power? Evan Williams Military Aviation 9 July 22nd 04 02:45 AM
max altitude and Mach 1 Boomer Military Aviation 22 June 1st 04 08:04 PM
P-38 Exhaust Stephen Harding Military Aviation 10 April 19th 04 07:03 AM
Forward Swept Wings Canuck Bob Home Built 16 October 3rd 03 05:50 PM
Harrier thrust vectoring in air-to-air combat? Alexandre Le-Kouby Military Aviation 11 September 3rd 03 01:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.