![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Todd Pattist wrote in
: I disagree. "Expiration" is different from "revocation." The latter implies affirmative action by the issuing authority to withdraw the medical, presumably for cause. The former does not carry that implication. If you let it expire you did not meet the requirements to have the medical, so by definition it is either revoked or suspended. You can't use it. For the purposes of the LSA that is how it can be interpreted. It is one thing to allow a normal medical to expire, but anyone who has a special issuance, by definition, does not qualify for a normal medical certificate. The letter that you are sent when you receive a special issuance medical is VERY specific: "You are ineligible for third-class medical certification under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR's)," blah blah... "Not have had his or her most recently issued medical certificate (if the person has held a medical certificate) suspended or revoked or most recent Authorization for a Special Issuance of a Medical Certificate withdrawn;" Nowhere does the rule mention "expired." It refers throughout to affirmative actions by the FAA such as "suspended," "revoked" and "withdrawn." Todd, if you do not follow the requirements to renew your special issuance medical, the issue doesn't just lie in limbo, What makes you think it does? The FAA goes on to say: "These revisions are based on the FAA's concern that pilots whose airman medical certificates have been denied, suspended, or revoked or whose Authorization for Special Issuance of a Medical Certificate (Authorization) has been withdrawn would be allowed to operate light-sport aircraft" It seems clear to me that expired medical certificates, even ones under Special Issuance, are not going to prevent use of the DL as a medical. Yes, they will be. The paragraph above is part of the explanation of why the change was made at the last minute, without giving anyone a chance to have an opinion or complain!!! I don't have a special issuance medical, but even if I did, I'm comfortable that they would have said "expired" if they meant that everyone with a current medical had to keep getting one. That's not what they say either. Juan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Juan Jimenez" wrote in message ... If you let it expire you did not meet the requirements to have the medical, so by definition it is either revoked or suspended. Bull****. It's just expired...you can't use it anymore. There's a difference between expiration (which is without prejudice) and having it terminated by an explicit action. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Natalie" wrote in
m: "Juan Jimenez" wrote in message ... If you let it expire you did not meet the requirements to have the medical, so by definition it is either revoked or suspended. Bull****. It's just expired...you can't use it anymore. There's a difference between expiration (which is without prejudice) and having it terminated by an explicit action. No, Ron. Suppose you get a letter from the FAA asking you for an update of... say... your diabetic situation, from your doctor. What do you think will happen if you ignore the letter and try to wait until the special issuance expires, so that you can then fly LSA aircraft with a DL? (This is no different than not sending in the required medical reports needed to renew the special issuance medical; that request is made when you get the medical in the first place.) I'll give you one guess, and a hint: it's not an expiration and it will be highly prejudiced. Make sure you check your sources, because I have the answer right in front of me, in black and white, on FAA letterhead. Juan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
... I'll give you one guess, and a hint: it's not an expiration and it will be highly prejudiced. Make sure you check your sources, because I have the answer right in front of me, in black and white, on FAA letterhead. And so what *is* the definition of "is"? This is the archtypical example of phony news hacks trying to make something out of nothing. I already posted the specific response of the FAA with regard to this specific question. Read it again. If you can't find it, ask for help. This is a dip**** bull**** response that is trying to stir up a non-existant issue. *PLONK* Rich S. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rich S." wrote in
: And so what *is* the definition of "is"? Hello, Mr. Clinton. Didn't know you were a pilot. This is the archtypical example of phony news hacks trying to make something out of nothing. I already posted the specific response of the FAA with regard to this specific question. Read it again. If you can't find it, ask for help. This is a dip**** bull**** response that is trying to stir up a non-existant issue. *PLONK* Ah, so your real agenda finally popped up. Hmm. Oh, well, no loss to the thread. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
... *PLONK* Ah, so your real agenda finally popped up. Hmm. Oh, well, no loss to the thread. Main Entry: stu·pid 1 a : slow of mind : b : given to unintelligent decisions or acts : acting in an unintelligent or careless manner c : lacking intelligence or reason too dumb to figure out what's going on. Main Entry: agen·da 2 : an underlying often ideological plan or program a political agenda I have no agenda, stupid. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Juan Jimenez" wrote in message ... No, Ron. Suppose you get a letter from the FAA asking you for an update of... say... your diabetic situation, from your doctor. What do you think will happen if you ignore the letter and try to wait until the special issuance expires, so that you can then fly LSA aircraft with a DL? (This is no different than not sending in the required medical reports needed to renew the special issuance medical; that request is made when you get the medical in the first place.) Your original authorization will say "this authorization expires XXXX". The letter will also tell you what to do (usually about 3 months before the expiration of your auhtoriation) to renew it. What ever mental condition your special issuance is for surely reads like this. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Juan Jimenez" wrote in message . .. No, Ron. Suppose you get a letter from the FAA asking you for an update of... say... your diabetic situation, from your doctor. What do you think will happen if you ignore the letter and try to wait until the special issuance expires, so that you can then fly LSA aircraft with a DL? (This is no different than not sending in the required medical reports needed to renew the special issuance medical; that request is made when you get the medical in the first place.) Your original authorization will say "this authorization expires XXXX". The letter will also tell you what to do (usually about 3 months before the expiration of your auhtoriation) to renew it. What ever mental condition your special issuance is for surely reads like this. Ron. The sad part is that juan will not get it even if he reads what you just posted. But I like it "What ever mental condition YOUR special issuance if for" Good one Ron |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Natalie" wrote in
m: Your original authorization will say "this authorization expires XXXX". The letter will also tell you what to do (usually about 3 months before the expiration of your auhtoriation) to renew it. What ever mental condition your special issuance is for surely reads like this. Wrong letter. I'm talking about the letter revoking your medical because you did not reply to them with a status letter from your doctor on your diabetes type II, for example. Would you like to see proof, via email? I think when you see it you will agree with me on this issue. While you are under the special issuance, the FAA will consider you to be flying under the authority of the special issuance, not the DL, and you'll be treated just like any other special issuance regardless of what kind of airplane you fly (short of ultralights). Juan |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
... Todd Pattist wrote in : I disagree. "Expiration" is different from "revocation." The latter implies affirmative action by the issuing authority to withdraw the medical, presumably for cause. The former does not carry that implication. If you let it expire you did not meet the requirements to have the medical, so by definition it is either revoked or suspended. You can't use it. For the purposes of the LSA that is how it can be interpreted. It is one thing to allow a normal medical to expire, but anyone who has a special issuance, by definition, does not qualify for a normal medical certificate. The letter that you are sent when you receive a special issuance medical is VERY specific: "You are ineligible for third-class medical certification under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR's)," blah blah... Gee, along with just about everyone in this thread, the AOPA seems to disagree with you too: http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...rt.html#miller "...Under the rules, if his special issuance medical certificate lapses, he can still fly exercising the privileges of a Sport Pilot certificate with a driver's license, providing that he self-certifies that he is medically fit to fly." You may be proved correct (I don't think so), but until that distant time, I think I'll believe all the doctors and lawyers on the various AOPA panels. -cj |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
sport pilot humor | Occom | Home Built | 0 | April 9th 04 04:22 PM |
Sport Pilot Leaves DOT for OMB, Latest News | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 3 | December 25th 03 02:49 AM |
New Sport Pilot Aircraft Website | Info | Home Built | 0 | November 29th 03 10:25 AM |
Sport Pilot Seminar & Fly-in | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | October 11th 03 05:21 AM |