![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() alexy wrote: Corky Scott wrote: With small schools and small classes, students with learning disabilities have a disproportionately large affect on the test results. I don't understand this one. Why is that? Fresh air leads to learning disabilities, or is it too much maple sugar? If you have one disabled child in a school that has 500 students, it doesn't affect the average performance of the school. If you have one disabled child in 500 students, but these students are spread out over 10 schools, the performance of the one school that kid is in will show up as disproportionately poor. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote:
alexy wrote: Corky Scott wrote: With small schools and small classes, students with learning disabilities have a disproportionately large affect on the test results. I don't understand this one. Why is that? Fresh air leads to learning disabilities, or is it too much maple sugar? If you have one disabled child in a school that has 500 students, it doesn't affect the average performance of the school. If you have one disabled child in 500 students, but these students are spread out over 10 schools, the performance of the one school that kid is in will show up as disproportionately poor. Oh, okay. I didn't realize that the incidence of learning disabilities was so low. In that case, I agree that a few VT schools would have a harder time meeting the requirements, while most VT schools would have an easier time of it than would larger schools. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"alexy" wrote in message
... Oh, okay. I didn't realize that the incidence of learning disabilities was so low. It's not. Nor are disabled students genuinely causing problems with standardized test scores. "No child left behind" isn't helping inner city children any more than it's helping rural children. The thought that we can improve education by cutting funding to the underperforming schools is just plain messed up. Many "underperforming schools" are underperforming because their resources are already stretched wafer thin. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote If you have one disabled child in a school that has 500 students, it doesn't affect the average performance of the school. If you have one disabled child in 500 students, but these students are spread out over 10 schools, the performance of the one school that kid is in will show up as disproportionately poor. George Patterson I hope that this 500 was a number pulled out of your hat, and not what you believe is a close estimate. The number of kids passed along without being able to read and write is a disaster, and telling of our biggest failure in the schools of today and the past. 1 in 50 is still too low of a number. Wow. -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morgans wrote: I hope that this 500 was a number pulled out of your hat, and not what you believe is a close estimate. Absolutely. I was simply providing an example to Alex of what Corky was talking about. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1 watt and 5 watt LED for Nav lights? | Bill | Home Built | 21 | May 10th 04 05:15 PM |