![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There aren't any. Allowing gays to marry would harm no one.
That said, from Jay you'll probably "find out" that you can't trust gay people around children of the same sex. He has a very distorted view of the consequences of homosexuality, and may very well believe that allowing gays to marry might hurt someone. Thanks, Pete, for filling in for me. However, your distorted view of my point (from way back when we were discussing the problems that come along with allowing a homosexual Boy Scout leader to take boys on overnight camping trips) doesn't cast any light on the question this gentleman is trying to answer. CJ did a pretty good job of answering the question, however. It's not a matter of denying homosexuals the right to marry -- it's a matter of distorting the definition of "marriage" to fit your agenda. "Marriage" is the union of a man and a woman. There are no laws (to my knowledge) forbidding homosexuals from engaging in this practice. Therefore, no discrimination exists. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:coMkd.327130$wV.310368@attbi_s54... [...] "Marriage" is the union of a man and a woman. There are no laws (to my knowledge) forbidding homosexuals from engaging in this practice. Therefore, no discrimination exists. I'm not sure why you have your head stuck in the sand, but you do. Your "definition" of marriage is hardly shared by everyone. It used to be that the word "person" did not include black people. You can't go running to the dictionary every time someone has a view you don't hold to. The fact is that civil marriage grants numerous benefits to those married, and those benefits are illegally being withheld from homosexuals. There are plenty of people (perhaps including yourself) that say "so what? I don't care whether homosexuals are treated equally". Some people even say "so what? they chose to be homosexuals, if they want the benefits, they can choose to be heterosexual" (maybe you say this too). But the latter is not supported by scientific evidence, and neither is a particularly open-minded, loving attitude. "No discrimination exists"? Oh well...you're just proving my point about how huge portions of the electorate simply believe whatever they want to believe, regardless of the facts. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leaving the community | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 556 | November 30th 04 08:08 PM |
aero-domains for anybody in the aviation community | secura | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 26th 04 07:37 PM |
Unruly Passengers | SelwayKid | Piloting | 88 | June 5th 04 08:35 AM |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |
Big Kahunas | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 360 | December 20th 03 12:59 AM |