![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jharper aaatttt cisco dddooottt com wrote:
One thing to add to what the other posters have said... in a climbing turn a plane can easily appear to be stationary for a short while. Not sure about the optics of this but from my office area I can see planes taking off from San Jose and starting the right turn for the standard departure course, and this illusion is quite common. Combine that with a strong headwind and the effect of the size of the plane, and you could easily believe it had stopped. John yes, but as best as I could tell, the plane wasn't turning. It appeared to be taking a straight path up, or trying to anyway. Debbie |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jharper aaatttt cisco dddooottt com wrote:
One other thing... it's essentially impossible to stop a fixed-wing airplane in midair. yep, that's why I was expected the plane to fall from the sky. (You can have zero ground speed due to headwinds, but not zero airspeed). If you try, the nose drops and it glides towards the ground. If you try to stop that, it will eventually perform an aerodynamic stall, which WILL make the nose drop, but it still won't come to a halt. About the only way to reach zero airspeed is to pull the plane into a near-vertical climb. And even then it reacts by dropping the nose and building up some speed again (or if you are truly vertical, it can fall tail-first and then it will at some point snap into a more normal posture and then start to fly nose-first again). It's fun to do though, in the right kind of airplane - a small aerobatic one - and with enough altitude. John if it had been an airshow kind of situation I wouldn't have given it a thought but this was a commercial jet and it was over a populated area. No fun... Debbie |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C Kingsbury wrote:
Debbie, A large transport jet (such as a DC-10 operated by FedEx) can climb, lightly loaded, at speeds around 150mph. This would be unusual (170-200mph is more normal) but well short of impossible. It might have been a maintenance flight, for instance. Now, with that in mind let's apply a few more factors. First, windspeed. Let's say the wind is blowing at 40mph. This would not be unusual for the Northern half of the country this time of year. An airplane flying into that wind would only need to move at 110mph relative to the ground. Windspeed can vary strongly from the ground to the first few thousand feet as well, so you might not have noticed the wondspeed on the ground. Now, you also mentioned you were in the car going at least 40mph, so relative to you, the plane would only appear to be moving at 70mph. Last, you need to do a little trigonometry, I'm afraid. Imagine putting a ladder up against the side of your house. The ladder goes up ten feet, and at its base is set back perhaps three or four feet from the house. Now, when you climb that ladder, you are traveling ten feet, but you only move forward three or four. A similar thing is going on when you compare your speed in the car to the plane's speed in the air. So we can reduce the difference to perhaps 55 or 60mph. What you perceive as speed is going to be based on changes in angle, in other words, you expect to see the plane "pulling ahead of you" at a certain rate. It turns out that the human eye is quite poor at judging small angles. A speed difference of 60mph at a distance of half a mile is going to produce very small angular changes, which your eye will not perceive well. So, even though the plane is moving at sufficient speed to fly quite safely, to your eye it will appear to be standing still. I can assure you that even us pilots, who know all these things, still often see the very same illusion you describe, especially with very large airplanes. It's simply a combination of factors that produce an overwhelming optical illusion. -cwk. yes, I've imagined the whole trig thing. That's why I was looking at the buildings and other higher geographic markers to get a fix on how it appeared to be moving relative to those things. Plus, for a moment I was stopped and pretty much next to it, although of course I was on the ground and it was probably a couple of thousand feet up or less. And, if it makes a difference in possible explanations, the plane was headed east and I was moving west. I'm 99.999% sure it wasn't moving or was moving very slowly. Note, I've driven in this particular area for more than a decade and I've seen hundreds of planes moving in the sky from many vantage points under many different weather and cloud conditions. I'm pretty sure of what I saw. Your explanation makes great sense but I'm still not convinced that it was an optical illusion. Really hope so though because it was quite disturbing. Debbie |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darrell S wrote:
"As I was moving relatively slowly" quoting from your post, it sounds like you were in your car driving. The APPARENT relative movement of an aircraft being observed from a moving vehicle changes drastically if either the aircraft or the car change relative headings. That could make it appear as if the forward motion of the jet had stopped. As for then "it continued climbing" is hard to explain. Perhaps you just thought it had stopped climbing due to the apparent stoppage of any forward movement. yes, I was paying particular attention to how high it was, for obvious reasons. When I fixed on its altitude relative to buildings, power poles, the freeway, etc., for a few seconds the altitude didn't seem to be changing. And for a few seconds my car wasn't moving at all and it didn't seem to be moving either, or if it was it was going slower that you'd expect a plane in takeoff to be moving. Then suddenly did it start moving forward and up. It was just like a helicopter, except it wasn't a helicopter. Debbie |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DM wrote:
snipped thank you to everyone who replied. I've been considering all the explanations offered and appreciate the information. I'm pretty close to accepting the "optical illusion" idea but am not quite there yet. I was looking hard at that plane because I really didn't want to believe what I was seeing. If it weren't for the fact that I could read the name of the carrier on the plane, I'd probably be going for a UFO explanation! Fly safe everybody. Debbie |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DM" wrote in message ... Yesterday I saw a cargo jet (a major air express company) come to what seemed like a dead stop in midair as it was making its ascent. After about 20 - 30 seconds of hanging without dropping out of the sky, it continued climbing and apparently did not crash. As others have said, it's just an optical illusion, unless the wind picked up suddenly to bring the aircraft's ground speed to zero (unlikely). At Raleigh-Durham International, there used to be a road that paralleled one of the main runways. A couple of times, I just happened to be on that road at the end where a large commercial jet (B737or similar) was just starting its takeoff roll. I floored the car and left the jet behind. About the time I got to the speed of around 70 mph, that jet blew past me about midway down the runway going so much faster it was hard to believe. It brought home the fact that those jets are moving very fast when they look like they are going the slowest. -Trent PP-ASEL |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DM" wrote in message
... thank you to everyone who replied. I've been considering all the explanations offered and appreciate the information. I'm pretty close to accepting the "optical illusion" idea but am not quite there yet. Airliners simply don't stop in midair. You have no choice but to accept the "optical illusion" idea. [...] Fly safe everybody. We do. Now, since you brought it up, how about you quit panicking every time you see an airplane go overhead doing something other than what you think it ought to be doing. We're not the dangerous boogey man that you, the general public, apparently think we are. Tell your friends. Thanks. Pete |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DM wrote:
yes, I've imagined the whole trig thing. That's why I was looking at the buildings and other higher geographic markers to get a fix on how it appeared to be moving relative to those things. Plus, for a moment I was stopped and pretty much next to it, although of course I was on the ground and it was probably a couple of thousand feet up or less. And, if it makes a difference in possible explanations, the plane was headed east and I was moving west. I'm 99.999% sure it wasn't moving or was moving very slowly. Put me in for $100 on that 99,999-to-1 odds bet! g Seriously, it sounds like you are trying to understand what you perceived, and I think the responses here have been right on target. I'm betting on the laws of physics and hope some explanation here will lead to an "aha" for you, to understand what caused your perception. -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... We do. Now, since you brought it up, how about you quit panicking every time you see an airplane go overhead doing something other than what you think it ought to be doing. We're not the dangerous boogey man that you, the general public, apparently think we are. Tell your friends. Methinks the man doth protest too much. -cwk. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DM wrote: interesting, but no, it wasn't particularly windy on the ground. I have the winds aloft forecast for yesterday morning. Where was this? George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rental policy | Robert | Piloting | 83 | May 13th 04 05:29 PM |
I need some advice on buying my own plane BEFORE training... | Anthony L | Piloting | 6 | April 22nd 04 11:13 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |