Leaving the community

"Corky Scott" wrote in message Whatever
Clinton did, it FOR SURE did not result in war or the death
of anyone. Sure, he showed a lack of fidelity towards his marriage,
but that's IT and it's his and Hillarie's problem, not the nations'.



BULL$HIT Corky, Every time BC got in trouble he chucked a missle at someone.

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:33:22 -0600, "Gig Giacona"
wrote:

BULL$HIT Corky, Every time BC got in trouble he chucked a missle at someone.

Gig, you'll have to explain where you're going with this because I'm
not seeing the connection with what I've written.

Corky Scott

"Corky Scott" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:33:22 -0600, "Gig Giacona"
wrote:

BULL$HIT Corky, Every time BC got in trouble he chucked a missle at
someone.

Gig, you'll have to explain where you're going with this because I'm
not seeing the connection with what I've written.

Corky Scott

Damn Corky you're going to make me remeber what we talked about last week.
But from my response I'd be willing to bet that yyou said something to the
effect that Bush, unlike Clinton, likes to kill people with the military and
my statement refers to Clinton ordering Cruise Missle attacks on asprin
factories.

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:06:25 -0600, "Gig Giacona"
wrote:

Damn Corky you're going to make me remeber what we talked about last week.
But from my response I'd be willing to bet that yyou said something to the
effect that Bush, unlike Clinton, likes to kill people with the military and
my statement refers to Clinton ordering Cruise Missle attacks on asprin
factories.

In this sir, you err. The discussion at the time was regarding
missinformation. Bush's missinformation took us to war, Clinton's
missinformation got him in big trouble with his wife, and some
extremely uptight Republican's. Granted, fondling a young intern in
the Oval Office is a bit uncouth, even if she did initiate the
relationship by raising her skirt to show off her thong underware. No
question, he demonstrated a woeful lack of decorum and insulted his
wife and their marriage publically.

It was a comparison of grande scale, war versus a yucky stained dress.

Corky Scott

"Corky Scott" wrote in message
...
Bush's missinformation took us to war, Clinton's
missinformation got him in big trouble with his wife, and some
extremely uptight Republican's. Granted, fondling a young intern in
the Oval Office is a bit uncouth, even if she did initiate the
relationship by raising her skirt to show off her thong underware. No
question, he demonstrated a woeful lack of decorum and insulted his
wife and their marriage publically.

It was a comparison of grande scale, war versus a yucky stained dress.

Corky Scott

Yes, and Rome burned while Nero fiddled (or Clinton diddled, whatever).
Nobody knows what the results of his activities were on the world stage.

Allen

Allen,

Nobody knows what the results of his activities were on the world stage.


Huh? We were all there to witness it.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Allen,

Nobody knows what the results of his activities were on the world stage.


Huh? We were all there to witness it.

Good grief I hope not. That had to be a god awfull ugly picture.


--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Corky Scott" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:06:25 -0600, "Gig Giacona"
wrote:

Damn Corky you're going to make me remeber what we talked about last week.
But from my response I'd be willing to bet that yyou said something to the
effect that Bush, unlike Clinton, likes to kill people with the military
and
my statement refers to Clinton ordering Cruise Missle attacks on asprin
factories.

In this sir, you err. The discussion at the time was regarding
missinformation. Bush's missinformation took us to war, Clinton's
missinformation got him in big trouble with his wife, and some
extremely uptight Republican's. Granted, fondling a young intern in
the Oval Office is a bit uncouth, even if she did initiate the
relationship by raising her skirt to show off her thong underware. No
question, he demonstrated a woeful lack of decorum and insulted his
wife and their marriage publically.

It was a comparison of grande scale, war versus a yucky stained dress.

Corky Scott


The point was that Clinton shot cruise missles at an asprin factory to move
the attention of the public from the "yucky stained dress." Last time I
checked shooting cruise missles at someone was an act of war.

Gig,

Last time I
checked shooting cruise missles at someone was an act of war.


Well, if that was a war, then what do you call the mess in Iraq now?
While technically, you are correct, it doesn't really compare.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:06:17 -0600, "Gig Giacona"
wrote:

The point was that Clinton shot cruise missles at an asprin factory to move
the attention of the public from the "yucky stained dress." Last time I
checked shooting cruise missles at someone was an act of war.

Oh. Ok I did not see how you were connecting things. I doubt that
Clinton thought up attacking the terrorist targets all by himself.
I'll bet he discussed things with his security advisors and the JCS
and asked them for some options to consider. This was in response to
the information that terrorist cells were discovered, right? One was
a direct attack on Bin Laden?

Have you noticed the number of revelatory books written by people who
worked for Bush and left that employment that have come out during
Bush's first term? Revelations like the Bush White House ignored
repeated warnings about El Qaida and that they were focused on
attacking Iraq long before the attacks of 9/11, and that after the
attack Bush specifically asked for evidence linking Iraq to the
attacks? That's what happens in a free society, news like that leaks
out.

But I don't recall anyone in the Clinton administration, or any
journalist coming up with hard facts confirming the missile attacks as
mere diversions from Clinton's infidelity in the Oval Office. I do
recall a lot of smirking "wag the dog" allegations from journalists,
but no confirmation, just speculation, and a movie that got people
thinking.

Can you point to hard evidence that Clinton lobbed missiles as a
diversion?

Thanks, Corky Scott