A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Can GPS be *too* accurate? Do I need some XTE??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 18th 04, 11:58 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill Denton" wrote in message
news
Someone named "Peter R." gave an interpretation of a section of the AIM;
4-4-10. IFR SEPARATION STANDARDS

I posted the text of that section; if you want to call that bringing
something up, be my guest.


That section has nothing to do with "VFR-on-top".

You're only looking for an argument anyway.


Ad hominem.

I said I was a professional writer; I in no way implied that you were a
competent reader.


Ad hominem.


  #2  
Old November 19th 04, 12:05 AM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

b. Separation will be provided (by ATC - my note) between all aircraft
operating on IFR flight plans except during that part of the flight (outside
of Class B airspace or a TRSA) being conducted on a VFR-on-top/VFR
conditions clearance. Under these conditions, ATC may issue traffic
advisories, but it is the sole responsibility of the pilot to be vigilant so
as to see and avoid other aircraft.

That's the section I posted. The third line down references VFR-on-top.

Reading is fundamental...



"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
news
Someone named "Peter R." gave an interpretation of a section of the AIM;
4-4-10. IFR SEPARATION STANDARDS

I posted the text of that section; if you want to call that bringing
something up, be my guest.


That section has nothing to do with "VFR-on-top".

You're only looking for an argument anyway.


Ad hominem.

I said I was a professional writer; I in no way implied that you were a
competent reader.


Ad hominem.




  #3  
Old November 19th 04, 01:58 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...
[snip]

That's the section I posted. The third line down references VFR-on-top.


So, now you are agreeing that it was you that brought up VFR-on-top? As
irrelevant as it is to this thread, you are the person who introduced it.
By your own admission.


  #4  
Old November 19th 04, 03:15 AM
Bill Denton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, I am not agreeing to anything. I will state that I was the first to
introduce the words VFR-on-top into the thread, while quoting a section of
the AIM.

The AIM states that ATC will provide IFR/IFR separation. But, a VFR-on-fop
flight is an IFR flight, and ATC does not provide separation to VFR-on-top
aircraft. We were discussing IFR separation and this is a part of them, so
it is relevant to the thread.



"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...
[snip]

That's the section I posted. The third line down references VFR-on-top.


So, now you are agreeing that it was you that brought up VFR-on-top? As
irrelevant as it is to this thread, you are the person who introduced it.
By your own admission.




  #5  
Old November 19th 04, 07:18 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...
[...] We were discussing IFR separation


No, we weren't. YOU turned it into that discussion, but nothing about the
original post had anything to do with IFR separation.

That is, in fact, the entire point of this monster subthread you've
inspired.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can GPS be *too* accurate? Do I need some XTE?? Icebound Instrument Flight Rules 82 November 22nd 04 08:01 PM
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes WalterM140 Military Aviation 428 July 1st 04 11:16 PM
How accurate was B-26 bombing? ArtKramr Military Aviation 59 March 3rd 04 10:10 PM
Local TV News ran an accurate story about airframe icing last night Peter R. Piloting 5 January 29th 04 01:01 AM
VOR and reverse sensing Koopas Ly Piloting 40 August 25th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.