![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
news ![]() Someone named "Peter R." gave an interpretation of a section of the AIM; 4-4-10. IFR SEPARATION STANDARDS I posted the text of that section; if you want to call that bringing something up, be my guest. That section has nothing to do with "VFR-on-top". You're only looking for an argument anyway. Ad hominem. I said I was a professional writer; I in no way implied that you were a competent reader. Ad hominem. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
b. Separation will be provided (by ATC - my note) between all aircraft
operating on IFR flight plans except during that part of the flight (outside of Class B airspace or a TRSA) being conducted on a VFR-on-top/VFR conditions clearance. Under these conditions, ATC may issue traffic advisories, but it is the sole responsibility of the pilot to be vigilant so as to see and avoid other aircraft. That's the section I posted. The third line down references VFR-on-top. Reading is fundamental... "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Bill Denton" wrote in message news ![]() Someone named "Peter R." gave an interpretation of a section of the AIM; 4-4-10. IFR SEPARATION STANDARDS I posted the text of that section; if you want to call that bringing something up, be my guest. That section has nothing to do with "VFR-on-top". You're only looking for an argument anyway. Ad hominem. I said I was a professional writer; I in no way implied that you were a competent reader. Ad hominem. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
... [snip] That's the section I posted. The third line down references VFR-on-top. So, now you are agreeing that it was you that brought up VFR-on-top? As irrelevant as it is to this thread, you are the person who introduced it. By your own admission. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, I am not agreeing to anything. I will state that I was the first to
introduce the words VFR-on-top into the thread, while quoting a section of the AIM. The AIM states that ATC will provide IFR/IFR separation. But, a VFR-on-fop flight is an IFR flight, and ATC does not provide separation to VFR-on-top aircraft. We were discussing IFR separation and this is a part of them, so it is relevant to the thread. "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Bill Denton" wrote in message ... [snip] That's the section I posted. The third line down references VFR-on-top. So, now you are agreeing that it was you that brought up VFR-on-top? As irrelevant as it is to this thread, you are the person who introduced it. By your own admission. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Denton" wrote in message
... [...] We were discussing IFR separation No, we weren't. YOU turned it into that discussion, but nothing about the original post had anything to do with IFR separation. That is, in fact, the entire point of this monster subthread you've inspired. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can GPS be *too* accurate? Do I need some XTE?? | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 82 | November 22nd 04 08:01 PM |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
How accurate was B-26 bombing? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 59 | March 3rd 04 10:10 PM |
Local TV News ran an accurate story about airframe icing last night | Peter R. | Piloting | 5 | January 29th 04 01:01 AM |
VOR and reverse sensing | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 40 | August 25th 03 01:26 AM |