![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Response at the bottom!
Jo Anne Slaven wrote: Dave Holford wrote: It's just like paper files. Yup. Most people who don't have time to waste post the latest document on top. Most people who are only concerned about their own convenience put the latest document in the place that is easiest for them to reach. Those who have nothing better to do with their time open the fastener, take out all the documents, put the latest on the bottom and then replace all the previous ones so that everything is in sequence. It keeps them happy and occupied! People who wish to conform to previously established conventions, making it easier for their peers to find information quickly, will file the documents the way it has historically been done, so as not to confuse people. Exactly - the latest to arrive goes on top. Just like the "IN" box on a desk which contains responses to correspondence. It is a stack, not a queue. Actually I agree with Bill Denton. In those newsgroups where top posting is the standard I try to top post and in those where bottom posting is the standard I try to bottom post. Sometimes when I'm more interested in the content than the policy I get it wrong. It's like arguing religion - pointless, the believers believe they are right and nothing will convert them. It makes for interminable threads whose content bears no relationship to the header whatsoever - how that helps to not confuse people escapes me. One would expect that if helping peers find information quickly was even a minor consideration the first action would be to make the header relevant. But, it does provide some light entertainment on a slow day. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Piloting | 125 | October 15th 04 07:42 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |