![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Journeyman wrote
I promised myself I'd butt out of this thread, but any chance Dudley would agree with this? Personality conflict aside, I really think you guys are not as far apart on outlook as he seems to think you are. Your original decision - to drop it - was the better one - but you seem unwilling to drop it without explanation so I will provide one. We are irreconcilably far apart on outlook. While we might occasionally agree on some specific issues, our fundamental views are so different that there really isn't any common ground for debate. At first I couldn't understand why that was. I knew it could not be age, experience, or military background because I've known, flown with, and been instructed by quite a few pilots who were highly experienced, much older, and had military backgrounds. I've even had the pleasure of instructing one. There was never that feeling of being so far apart on outlook - in fact, much of my outlook on flying and instruction was shaped by these pilots. And that's the key word - pilots. These were people who, often despite medical and financial challenges, had committed to staying in the sky as long as possible. It is a commitment I respect and share, and it produces a certain outlook. Some of them could no longer get a medical - so they flew gliders and/or ultralights. One could no longer afford to own an airpane and had to sell his - but he continued to instruct at an FBO, never drawing his pay - and when enough accumulated to fly for an hour, he would. I had always assumed that Dudley Henriques was cut from the same cloth as those pilots. Like you, I assumed the reason for the disagreements between us were a matter of misunderstanding or maybe personal issues. It was not until he made threats of going after me, such as had not been made since the era of the fish (which I may have misinterpreted - or may not have - it remains to be seen) that I actually made an effort to find out who he was - essentially to prepare my defense against a potential cyberstalker. Like many here, I post anonymously and have done so ever since the era of the fish. Those who have been here any amount of time know who I am - it's easy enough to figure out. Anonymity on the net is fragile at best, and not difficult to pierce. Thus I found it amusing when Mr. Henriques made the comments he did about my anonymity - imagine my amusement when I discovered there was no Dudley Henriques in the airman database. I won't publicly post his name - I'm sure he has his reasons for anonymity - but I will tell you the important difference that makes our outlooks irreconcilably different. He's not a pilot. He quit flying long ago and the only 'flying' he has done for a long time - or will ever do again - is on Microsoft Flight Sim (and its kin). You once mentioned that I made a compelling argument that safety is not always the most important thing, and that every time you push the throttle forward you are buying into that. You might ask him how long it has been since he has done that, and when the next time will be. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Are pilots really good or just lucky??? | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 68 | December 9th 04 01:53 PM |
Good Stories about Plane Purchases | Jon Kraus | Owning | 0 | August 11th 04 01:20 PM |
Good Source For PIREPS? | Phoenix Pilot | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 25th 03 03:59 AM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |