![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:04:56 -0500, Matt Whiting
wrote: wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Brooks Hagenow wrote: I am hardly a priest. I would like to make a correction though. Revisiting that site I found showing only 2.5% of the world's population were athiests I realized I don't actually know what an athiest is. Athiest is a religion. Reading further into the stats on that site they say 15% of the world's population have no religion and that number is falling, which I find surprising. I don't know what your point is, but I do know that the percentage of atheists in the U. S. is said generally to be about 10%, or 4 times the world percentage, assuming both numbers to be correct (an assertion of which I am uncertain) I'm curious to know what conclusions one can draw with either of these facts (assuming they are both correct). I also am curious about your assertion that "atheism is a religion". Definition #4 in the following: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=religion As far as I know, there are no atheistic altars, no stone buildings,no holy books, no wailing walls, no ceremonies, no prayers, no hymns, indeed, none of the things that are generally associated with religion.. Most of these aren't mentioned in any definition of religion with which I'm familiar. Religion is a system of beliefs, not artifacts. That's why the image of the virgin mary on a grilled cheese sandwich was bid up to $69,000 on eBay. Atheism, even modern philosophy, are all religious in nature despite the claims of the believers in these belief systems. Personally, I think it is an attempt by the religious to label atheists and secular humanists s "religious" in order to validate themselves, ( as they continually strive to do), even as they contend that atheism is anathema to them. A curious contradiction, to say the least. I find it equally curious that atheists, philosophers and others try so hard to avoid the term religion. Why are they so ashamed of their beliefs? They're not. They are ashamed to be associated with what you call religion, and the inhumane acts committed in its name. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:04:56 -0500, Matt Whiting wrote: wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Brooks Hagenow wrote: I am hardly a priest. I would like to make a correction though. Revisiting that site I found showing only 2.5% of the world's population were athiests I realized I don't actually know what an athiest is. Athiest is a religion. Reading further into the stats on that site they say 15% of the world's population have no religion and that number is falling, which I find surprising. I don't know what your point is, but I do know that the percentage of atheists in the U. S. is said generally to be about 10%, or 4 times the world percentage, assuming both numbers to be correct (an assertion of which I am uncertain) I'm curious to know what conclusions one can draw with either of these facts (assuming they are both correct). I also am curious about your assertion that "atheism is a religion". Definition #4 in the following: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=religion As far as I know, there are no atheistic altars, no stone buildings,no holy books, no wailing walls, no ceremonies, no prayers, no hymns, indeed, none of the things that are generally associated with religion.. Most of these aren't mentioned in any definition of religion with which I'm familiar. Religion is a system of beliefs, not artifacts. That's why the image of the virgin mary on a grilled cheese sandwich was bid up to $69,000 on eBay. You keep confusing fanatics with people who hold a genuine faith in a higher being. It really isn't that complicated. It is obvious that you've had a bad experience with organized religion at some point, but that is no reason to paint the whole world with your brush. Since we're in a flying forum, have you ever had a bad experience while flying? Do you even fly? If so, did you give up on flying because of one bad experience ... or one bad controller ... or one bad fellow pilot? Atheism, even modern philosophy, are all religious in nature despite the claims of the believers in these belief systems. Personally, I think it is an attempt by the religious to label atheists and secular humanists s "religious" in order to validate themselves, ( as they continually strive to do), even as they contend that atheism is anathema to them. A curious contradiction, to say the least. I find it equally curious that atheists, philosophers and others try so hard to avoid the term religion. Why are they so ashamed of their beliefs? They're not. They are ashamed to be associated with what you call religion, and the inhumane acts committed in its name. Committed by a very few on the fringes. If the atheists and philosophers did any research at all, they would know this. If every person in the world who professes a religious belief or affiliation was a wanton killer as you suggest, the world would have long ago ceased to be inhabited by humans. Since the majority of the population claim some religious belief, if each person killed even one other person, there'd be nobody left in less than a year. Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:04:56 -0500, Matt Whiting wrote: wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:21:10 GMT, Brooks Hagenow wrote: I am hardly a priest. I would like to make a correction though. Revisiting that site I found showing only 2.5% of the world's population were athiests I realized I don't actually know what an athiest is. Athiest is a religion. Reading further into the stats on that site they say 15% of the world's population have no religion and that number is falling, which I find surprising. I don't know what your point is, but I do know that the percentage of atheists in the U. S. is said generally to be about 10%, or 4 times the world percentage, assuming both numbers to be correct (an assertion of which I am uncertain) I'm curious to know what conclusions one can draw with either of these facts (assuming they are both correct). I also am curious about your assertion that "atheism is a religion". Definition #4 in the following: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=religion As far as I know, there are no atheistic altars, no stone buildings,no holy books, no wailing walls, no ceremonies, no prayers, no hymns, indeed, none of the things that are generally associated with religion.. Most of these aren't mentioned in any definition of religion with which I'm familiar. Religion is a system of beliefs, not artifacts. That's why the image of the virgin mary on a grilled cheese sandwich was bid up to $69,000 on eBay. You keep confusing fanatics with people who hold a genuine faith in a higher being. It really isn't that complicated. It is obvious that you've had a bad experience with organized religion at some point, but that is no reason to paint the whole world with your brush. Since we're in a flying forum, have you ever had a bad experience while flying? Do you even fly? If so, did you give up on flying because of one bad experience ... or one bad controller ... or one bad fellow pilot? Atheism, even modern philosophy, are all religious in nature despite the claims of the believers in these belief systems. Personally, I think it is an attempt by the religious to label atheists and secular humanists s "religious" in order to validate themselves, ( as they continually strive to do), even as they contend that atheism is anathema to them. A curious contradiction, to say the least. I find it equally curious that atheists, philosophers and others try so hard to avoid the term religion. Why are they so ashamed of their beliefs? They're not. They are ashamed to be associated with what you call religion, and the inhumane acts committed in its name. Committed by a very few on the fringes. If the atheists and philosophers did any research at all, they would know this. Where is your authority for this contention? For every one you can provide, I can provide you a counter-authority. If every person in the world who professes a religious belief or affiliation was a wanton killer as you suggest, the world would have long ago ceased to be inhabited by humans. Since the majority of the population claim some religious belief, if each person killed even one other person, there'd be nobody left in less than a year. Matt Yet,no matter what religion or denomination you belong to, in all likelihood it has engaged in persecution, violence, and religious intolerance. And that's the reason why the Founders wanted religion (knowing its gory history) out of government and government out of religion. ********* By the time a boy has been two years in a church school he is immunized against religion. -- Colin Gordon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:15:31 -0500, " jls"
wrote: Yet,no matter what religion or denomination you belong to, in all likelihood it has engaged in persecution, violence, and religious intolerance. And that's the reason why the Founders wanted religion (knowing its gory history) out of government and government out of religion. ********* Amen to that, brother. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:12:23 -0500, Matt Whiting
wrote: Committed by a very few on the fringes. If the atheists and philosophers did any research at all, they would know this. If every person in the world who professes a religious belief or affiliation was a wanton killer as you suggest, the world would have long ago ceased to be inhabited by humans. Since the majority of the population claim some religious belief, if each person killed even one other person, there'd be nobody left in less than a year. Matt Hitler was only one person. He was responsible for the death of 6 million Jews. It's not the number of people who commit the atrocities that's significant, it's the number who die. Millions upon millions have died thanks to religious beliefs, in barbaric fashion for the most part. And it's happening today. But hose with their heads buried in the religious sands (or in anatomical locations where the sun don't shine) just never see it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
== cfeyeeye writes:
But hose with their heads buried in the religious sands (or in anatomical locations where the sun don't shine) just never see it. Why are you picking on the prostitutes? What do they have to do with it? -- PGP key at http://www.longhands.org/drg-pgp.txt Key Id:0x507D93DF |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
wrote: snip Personally, I think it is an attempt by the religious to label atheists and secular humanists s "religious" in order to validate themselves, ( as they continually strive to do), even as they contend that atheism is anathema to them. A curious contradiction, to say the least. I find it equally curious that atheists, philosophers and others try so hard to avoid the term religion. Why are they so ashamed of their beliefs? Not ashamed of their beliefs, but perhaps reluctant to be lumped in with the sheep mentality of the 'religious'? It sounds like you would define religion as a belief system to explain that which we do not _know_. By that definition certainly everyone must be 'religious'. It is only recently that I have heard of this definition (and I find its timing a bit suspect). Previously it was belief in a higher power and/or an afterlife that defined one as 'religious' or not. But even using this new idea I still see atheism as different from religion in the way faith is applied. Religious faith does not allow for much critical thinking and certainly doesn't tolerate dissent. Whereas atheistic 'faith' accepts change as it happens. There are certainly things I have to take on 'faith'. I don't _know_ the universe was created by the big bang. But my acceptance of the theory will be gladly changed in an instant if the physicists come up with something to refute it tomorrow. I used to believe in the steady state universe and I experienced no trauma in making the change. In fact I relish the thought of learning new things about us. Contrast that to the adherence to dogma required by 'religion' and perhaps you can begin to understand why I wouldn't want to be associated with the same group that put Galileo in jail and wouldn't admit their mistake for _hundreds_ of years. -- Frank....H |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: wrote: snip Personally, I think it is an attempt by the religious to label atheists and secular humanists s "religious" in order to validate themselves, ( as they continually strive to do), even as they contend that atheism is anathema to them. A curious contradiction, to say the least. I find it equally curious that atheists, philosophers and others try so hard to avoid the term religion. Why are they so ashamed of their beliefs? Not ashamed of their beliefs, but perhaps reluctant to be lumped in with the sheep mentality of the 'religious'? It sounds like you would define religion as a belief system to explain that which we do not _know_. By that definition certainly everyone must be 'religious'. It is only recently that I have heard of this definition (and I find its timing a bit suspect). Previously it was belief in a higher power and/or an afterlife that defined one as 'religious' or not. I didn't define it, I just posted a reference to the definitions. I don't know how often the dictionary writers change the definition of religion, but it has had multiple definitions for as long as I can remember (35+ years). Matt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... Frank wrote: Matt Whiting wrote: wrote: snip Personally, I think it is an attempt by the religious to label atheists and secular humanists s "religious" in order to validate themselves, ( as they continually strive to do), even as they contend that atheism is anathema to them. A curious contradiction, to say the least. I find it equally curious that atheists, philosophers and others try so hard to avoid the term religion. Why are they so ashamed of their beliefs? Not ashamed of their beliefs, but perhaps reluctant to be lumped in with the sheep mentality of the 'religious'? It sounds like you would define religion as a belief system to explain that which we do not _know_. By that definition certainly everyone must be 'religious'. It is only recently that I have heard of this definition (and I find its timing a bit suspect). Previously it was belief in a higher power and/or an afterlife that defined one as 'religious' or not. I didn't define it, I just posted a reference to the definitions. I don't know how often the dictionary writers change the definition of religion, but it has had multiple definitions for as long as I can remember (35+ years). Matt Here's the Am. Heritage definition: rel., relig. a. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe. b. A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship. You can define it as you wish; many unscrupulous people do. Atheists are non-religious. They have no deity to worship; do not ordinarily attend church or revere the priesthood; are not particularly organized or split up into quarreling denominations; and don't take their beliefs on faith but rather depend on their observations, especially scientific observations. I have never known an atheist who considered himself anything but irreligious. Any atheist would consider himself slurred to be referred to as a religious person. So htf somebody can say atheism is a religion is to me incomprehensible. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leaving the community | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 556 | November 30th 04 08:08 PM |
aero-domains for anybody in the aviation community | secura | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 26th 04 07:37 PM |
Unruly Passengers | SelwayKid | Piloting | 88 | June 5th 04 08:35 AM |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |
Big Kahunas | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 360 | December 20th 03 12:59 AM |