![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it an offence to land anywhere but the
nearest suitable airport? As far as I'm aware it isn't an offense to crash anywhere other than the nearest airport - which appears to be what you are describing. Which authority must be notified? Initially the US - that's where the planes crashed. Where were the aircraft registered? Once the planes have landed, can they be moved from the place they stopped without permission from the investigating authority? Not unless they pose an immediate threat Tony -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Cessna 172H C-GICE |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tony roberts" wrote in message
Is it an offence to land anywhere but the nearest suitable airport? As far as I'm aware it isn't an offense to crash anywhere other than the nearest airport - which appears to be what you are describing. If you thought (thought?) that you could continue on would it be an offense to land anywhere but the nearest suitable airport? I'm guessing that arguing that you believed the plane to still be airworthy wouldn't fly, as it were. So, there would be no excuse for landing anywhere but the closest airport. That might result in an illegal entry vis a vis immigration authorities but the emergency justifies it. (I know a case where a Canadian student lost electrical power on a night solo and landed at a US airport. He was given very little trouble by US authorities. Pre 9/11 though.) Which authority must be notified? Initially the US - that's where the planes crashed. I would suspect. But is it an offence not to contact the TSB in Canada per Canadian regulations? (AIP GEN 3) Where were the aircraft registered? I believe they're US based. Once the planes have landed, can they be moved from the place they stopped without permission from the investigating authority? Not unless they pose an immediate threat My interpretation as well. Thanks. m |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() tony roberts wrote: Once the planes have landed, can they be moved from the place they stopped without permission from the investigating authority? Not unless they pose an immediate threat Common misconception. It's my property and if I feel I need to move it then I will move it. Also nowhere in any regs does it say an aircraft cannot be moved or must be released by some authority. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps"
tony roberts wrote: Once the planes have landed, can they be moved from the place they stopped without permission from the investigating authority? Not unless they pose an immediate threat Common misconception. It's my property and if I feel I need to move it then I will move it. Also nowhere in any regs does it say an aircraft cannot be moved or must be released by some authority. Of course you will. In what country? This question is a routine exam item. I assume that you're in the US (but Canadian regs are the same). You cannot legally move an airplane involved in an accident (with few exceptions) until authorized by the appropriate authority. Do some research: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...cfr830_03.html Score yourself: http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/ge.../Section14.htm le moo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Happy Dog wrote: "Newps" tony roberts wrote: Once the planes have landed, can they be moved from the place they stopped without permission from the investigating authority? Not unless they pose an immediate threat Common misconception. It's my property and if I feel I need to move it then I will move it. Also nowhere in any regs does it say an aircraft cannot be moved or must be released by some authority. Of course you will. In what country? This question is a routine exam item. I assume that you're in the US (but Canadian regs are the same). You cannot legally move an airplane involved in an accident (with few exceptions) until authorized by the appropriate authority. Do some research: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...cfr830_03.html Exactly what I said. If I feel I need to move it I can move it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps"
Common misconception. It's my property and if I feel I need to move it then I will move it. Also nowhere in any regs does it say an aircraft cannot be moved or must be released by some authority. Of course you will. In what country? This question is a routine exam item. I assume that you're in the US (but Canadian regs are the same). You cannot legally move an airplane involved in an accident (with few exceptions) until authorized by the appropriate authority. Do some research: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...cfr830_03.html Exactly what I said. If I feel I need to move it I can move it. Imbecile or troll. Pick one or both. Your statement is wholly incorrect. Interesting nonsense is interesting. Yours isn't. TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Subpart C--Preservation of Aircraft Wreckage, Mail, Cargo, and Records Sec. 830.10 Preservation of aircraft wreckage, mail, cargo, and records. (a) The operator of an aircraft involved in an accident or incident for which notification must be given is responsible for preserving to the extent possible any aircraft wreckage, cargo, and mail aboard the aircraft, and all records, including all recording mediums of flight, maintenance, and voice recorders, pertaining to the operation and maintenance of the aircraft and to the airmen until the Board takes custody thereof or a release is granted pursuant to Sec. 831.12(b) of this chapter. (b) Prior to the time the Board or its authorized representative takes custody of aircraft wreckage, mail, or cargo, such wreckage, mail, or cargo may not be disturbed or moved except to the extent necessary: (1) To remove persons injured or trapped; (2) To protect the wreckage from further damage; or (3) To protect the public from injury. (c) Where it is necessary to move aircraft wreckage, mail or cargo, sketches, descriptive notes, and photographs shall be made, if possible, of the original positions and condition of the wreckage and any significant impact marks. (d) The operator of an aircraft involved in an accident or incident shall retain all records, reports, internal documents, and memoranda dealing with the accident or incident, until authorized by the Board to the contrary. moo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Happy Dog wrote: Exactly what I said. If I feel I need to move it I can move it. Imbecile or troll. Pick one or both. Your statement is wholly incorrect. Interesting nonsense is interesting. Yours isn't. Drivel snipped. You can keep saying the same thing if you want but it doesn't change the fact that if I feel the need to move the wreckage to protect it or myself I will do so. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote in message
Happy Dog wrote: Exactly what I said. If I feel I need to move it I can move it. Imbecile or troll. Pick one or both. Your statement is wholly incorrect. Interesting nonsense is interesting. Yours isn't. Drivel snipped. You can keep saying the same thing if you want but it doesn't change the fact that if I feel the need to move the wreckage to protect it or myself I will do so. Bloviating idiot. You said "nowhere in any regs does it say an aircraft cannot be moved or must be released by some authority". That's incorrect. The "drivel" you snipped is from current NTSB Regulations. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/w...cfr830_03.html If you're a pilot, you have a knowledge and an attitude problem. Few seasoned pilots remember every question on their first few exams. But when an answer to one is posted for you, and you ignore and contradict it, that's skirting imbecile territory. And, still, not an on-topic word about my original post. So, who's the troll? le moo |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Common misconception. It's my property and if I feel I need to move it
then I will move it. Also nowhere in any regs does it say an aircraft cannot be moved or must be released by some authority. I'm Canadian and am following the Canadian regs, which state: Except to rescue or remove survivors, extinguish a fire, or to prevent danger to any person or property, nothing at the site should be touched or removed . The preservation of any marks on the ground or objects along the accident trail is also of critical importance. Tony -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Cessna 172H C-GICE |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Newps wrote: Common misconception. It's my property and if I feel I need to move it then I will move it. Also nowhere in any regs does it say an aircraft cannot be moved or must be released by some authority. That depends on where your mishap happens. On the airport I worked at your airplane belonged to me until I released it. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Piloting | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:36 PM |
How find out one's aviation insurance claims history? Aviation Claims Information Bureau? | cloudclimbr | Owning | 1 | February 15th 04 11:16 PM |