![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Gideon wrote: That statement was made during an ASF presentation I attended a while ago. It puzzled me. Why would a IR pilot fly VFR into IMC? I'm not sure myself, but I do remember an incident that was presented in a safety videotape. The pilot involved intended an IFR flight from Frederick, MD to the west. She was delayed in a business meeting and discovered when she got to the airport that her flight plan had expired. Rather than file a new one, she took off VFR under low ceilings intending to file in the air. Frederick is under the control of the Baltimore ATC. The ground rises to the west. Baltimore wouldn't clear her until they could pick her up on radar, and you have to get pretty high for them to do that in that area. While trying to get clearance and climbing to avoid terrain, the windshield went opaque. She came out of the clouds in a spiral at over a 70 degree bank, recovered a few hundred feet above the ground, and returned to Frederick to file a flight plan. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Andrew Gideon wrote: That statement was made during an ASF presentation I attended a while ago. It puzzled me. Why would a IR pilot fly VFR into IMC? I'm not sure myself, but I do remember an incident that was presented in a safety videotape. The pilot involved intended an IFR flight from Frederick, MD to the west. She was delayed in a business meeting and discovered when she got to the airport that her flight plan had expired. Rather than file a new one, she took off VFR under low ceilings intending to file in the air. Frederick is under the control of the Baltimore ATC. The ground rises to the west. Baltimore wouldn't clear her until they could pick her up on radar, and you have to get pretty high for them to do that in that area. While trying to get clearance and climbing to avoid terrain, the windshield went opaque. She came out of the clouds in a spiral at over a 70 degree bank, recovered a few hundred feet above the ground, and returned to Frederick to file a flight plan. She had originally filed a IFR flight pan, but lost control in the clouds? Certainly the flight plan was a small part of the problem. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G.R. Patterson III wrote
Andrew Gideon wrote: That statement was made during an ASF presentation I attended a while ago. It puzzled me. Why would a IR pilot fly VFR into IMC? I'm not sure myself, but I do remember an incident that was presented in a safety videotape. The pilot involved intended an IFR flight from Frederick, MD to the west. She was delayed in a business meeting and discovered when she got to the airport that her flight plan had expired. Rather than file a new one, she took off VFR under low ceilings intending to file in the air. Frederick is under the control of the Baltimore ATC. The ground rises to the west. Baltimore wouldn't clear her until they could pick her up on radar, and you have to get pretty high for them to do that in that area. While trying to get clearance and climbing to avoid terrain, the windshield went opaque. She came out of the clouds in a spiral at over a 70 degree bank, recovered a few hundred feet above the ground, and returned to Frederick to file a flight plan. Is there some part of this story that I'm missing? Apparently she almost immediately lost control of the plane once she got into the clouds. So when she gets down on the ground she files a flight plan and presumably then goes right back up into the same clouds. What assurance is there that she won't again become disoriented? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter wrote: Is there some part of this story that I'm missing? Transition to flying by instruments when you've been flying visually is not simple and takes time. The airlines learned this in the 30s and will have one pilot already on the gauges during takeoff when the aircraft will be in IMC shortly. An instrument rated pilot goes on the gauges before entering IMC and can be expected to do well at it. Those who enter IMC unexpectedly may lose control of the aircraft during the transition to instrument flight. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
Peter wrote: Is there some part of this story that I'm missing? Transition to flying by instruments when you've been flying visually is not simple and takes time. The airlines learned this in the 30s and will have one pilot already on the gauges during takeoff when the aircraft will be in IMC shortly. An instrument rated pilot goes on the gauges before entering IMC and can be expected to do well at it. Those who enter IMC unexpectedly may lose control of the aircraft during the transition to instrument flight. I'd still be concerned to fly IMC without reasonable confidence in the ability to recover from any disturbance that causes momentary loss of control. And in the case cited it doesn't sound as if the entrance into IMC should have been that unexpected. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter" wrote in message
G.R. Patterson III wrote: Transition to flying by instruments when you've been flying visually is not simple and takes time. The airlines learned this in the 30s and will have one pilot already on the gauges during takeoff when the aircraft will be in IMC shortly. An instrument rated pilot goes on the gauges before entering IMC and can be expected to do well at it. Those who enter IMC unexpectedly may lose control of the aircraft during the transition to instrument flight. I'd still be concerned to fly IMC without reasonable confidence in the ability to recover from any disturbance that causes momentary loss of control. Aerobatics under the hood. And in the case cited it doesn't sound as if the entrance into IMC should have been that unexpected. It isn't unexpected. It's denied. This scenario happens to everyone that flies in marginal weather, especially at night. If you're VFR, one shouldn't *have* to be flying almost solely by the gauges. So, as the weather gets worse, instead of acknowledging the defeat of their visual / balance sensory systems, the pilot tries ever harder to maintain visual reference. It takes discipline and training to make the correct decision as to when you're no longer in VMC, whether you're legal or not. (And, if you're not IFR, you aren't. But, too bad. Get over it and deal.) Hazy nights with no moon, in unpopulated areas are an invitation to trouble whether you're flying under VFR or IFR. It's so easy to be using some random light source (a streetlight or building light, bright star, etc.) as a reference. It works fine until the pilot is distracted for a moment and then mistakenly chooses some other light source at a slightly different angle as a reference. The pilot, now thinking that the difference in angle is due to their wings not being level, begins a set of manoeuvres based on erroneous information. If the error isn't quickly, the results are, at best, sobering. I've personally experienced something like this when, on a night X/C in a deserted area, no moon, haze, I mistook another aircraft for a bright star. Now, the unobscurred moon or an unmistakable mass of bright lights on the ground, like a city, are the only visual refs I trust at night. And, even then, at the first hint of upcoming IMC (it's often like looking for a ghost or a cloaked Romulan Vessel by noticing subtle anomalies in the sky ahead) I'm psyched to transition to instruments. le moo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Peter wrote: Is there some part of this story that I'm missing? Transition to flying by instruments when you've been flying visually is not simple and takes time. The airlines learned this in the 30s and will have one pilot already on the gauges during takeoff when the aircraft will be in IMC shortly. An instrument rated pilot goes on the gauges before entering IMC and can be expected to do well at it. Those who enter IMC unexpectedly may lose control of the aircraft during the transition to instrument flight. I think your conflating the transition to instruments with the transition to visual after and approach. Keeping the aircraft upright , during transition, is not that difficult (not the easy, but not that difficult either). Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
Is Spooky safe to take downtown? | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 17 | May 16th 04 04:23 AM |
An Algorithm for Defeating CAPS, or how the TSA will make us less safe | Aviv Hod | Piloting | 0 | January 14th 04 01:55 PM |
Fast Safe Plane | Charles Talleyrand | Piloting | 6 | December 30th 03 10:23 PM |
Four Nimitz Aviators Safe after | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 28th 03 10:31 PM |