![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct that Byrd exhibited a great deal of courage, with some
frequency. ...... However, he seemed to go weird when it came to his flights. The books by Balchen and others outline the frustration they had with his refusal to do any actual navigating on their flights. Thanks for taking the time to write a lengthy response, Rick. I haven't read Balchen's book. I guess I should. I did read two books quite critical of Byrd, Richard Montague's _Oceans, Poles, and Airmen_; and Dean Smith's _By the Seat of my Pants_, ten or more years ago. I don't recall anything about his "going weird," though, or refusing to navigate. I have a great deal of admiration for Byrd, but in reading the historical record, can't figure out why he would behave as he did during his expeditions. Perhaps you should entertain the hypothesis that he did NOT behave that way; that the charges were fictitious, motivated by jealousy, personal dislike, or some such reason. As you mentioned, he wasn't generous about sharing the credit for his achievements. There was also a lot of resentment, in Europe, that Byrd had beaten the Airship Norge, a European venture, to the Pole. As to the North Pole flight, the pilot, Floyd Bennett admitted on his death bed that they had simply flown out of sight of Spitsbergen and made circles for 15 hours because of an oil leak on one engine. I find that extremely hard to believe, Rick. It contradicts everything else we (or I) know about Byrd. I do recall that Bennett crawled out of the cabin in mid-flight to deal with that oil leak, but I never heard of that death-bed confession. I have no trouble believing Byrd didn't reach the pole. His Sun Compass was excellent at providing directional information, but it provided no ground-speed info at all. As you mentioned, Bennett died of pneumonia in Jeffrey Hale Hospital in Quebec, Canada, the result of attempting, although he was already ill, a flight to rescue the crew of the Bremen, who had made a forced landing on Greenly Island in the Gulf of st. Lawrence. Given the circumstances of his death, and his heroic reputation, he was no doubt being hovered over by a staff of doctors and nurses, trying to keep him alive. Did they report such a confession at that time? Byrd's navigational markings on his charts were made on the steamship on the voyage home. How can we be certain of that? They did not match the weather data that was available for the flight (winds),.... I would imagine any data available for such a desolate, uninhabited part of the globe, in those days, was hardly reliable. I'm sure you know that even today, forecast winds are usually the most undependable part of any weather briefing. The History Channel program implied strongly that Byrd was the pilot on his flights. He never was. He never did any flying on his expeditions. Except for doing the flying while Bennett was out there dealing with the oil leak, that is probably true. But I don't think that is a criticism. Navigating that flight was a far greater challenge than Bennett's stick-and-rudder chores, although I'm not slighting what it takes to do them for 16 hours. As I recall, in aviations early days, it was customary for the "captain" of an airplane not to do the flying, just as the captain of a naval vessel does not hold the wheel. (I don't think the Commander of NASA's space shots is the pilot, either.) It also implied that he was flying when the Fokker Trimotor he purchased for the Atlantic flight crashed. I didn't get that impression. IIRC, Anthony Fokker was flying it, wasn't he? (In any case, programs on the History Channel are loaded with mistakes, so such an error wouldn't be unusual. In fact, an error-free program would be much more unusual. For reasons no one knows, Byrd refused to take off. His continual delays angered Fokker so much that he withdrew from the project and nearly took his airplane with him. I don't know, either, but I do seem to recall that Lindbergh had to wait around for the wx to improve. "Refusing to take off" is one of the smartest things a pilot can do. As you agreed, earlier, we can hardly attribute his delay to cowardice. Balchen and Acosta both wrote that Byrd provided no navigational assistance to them during the flight across the Atlantic. Is that in Balchen's _Come North With Me_? I see we have that here in the Penn State library. I can find nothing in the catalog by Acosta, though. For the South Pole trip there were four airplanes and four pilots taken to Little America.... When I was in the Marines, I had the pleasure of knowing two extraordinary men who had been selected to go to the South Pole with Byrd on Operation High Jump in 1946. One was M.Sgt. Mincey, a radio oerator in VMR 252; and another M.Sgt whose name escapes me in my senility; he was a navigator in VMR-153; both squadrons were in MAG 21, as was I. (In the Marines, at least in those days, navigators were enlisted men.) Regrettably, I have lost track of both in the ensuing half-century; I suspect both are dead by now. Both were older than I and would be pushing 90 by now. As I recall the navigator had developed some kind of grid-system for navigating in the polar regions, and was seriously injured in a crash. A mountain in Antarctica was named for him. Did you encounter anything about either of those men in any of your reading about Byrd? vince norris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vince,
I did read two books quite critical of Byrd, Richard Montague's _Oceans, Poles, and Airmen_; and Dean Smith's _By the Seat of my Pants_, ten or more years ago. I don't recall anything about his "going weird," though, or refusing to navigate. You've read two very good books, I still haven't gotten a copy of Smith's book, but will do so. I'm also looking for Gould's as I've seen some excerpts from his writings regarding strange behavior by Byrd on the expeditions themselves and examples of his making his map entries in pencil and then, on the ground, when challenged by other observers aboard the airplane, going into another room and changing the notations. Perhaps you should entertain the hypothesis that he did NOT behave that way; that the charges were fictitious, motivated by jealousy, personal dislike, or some such reason. As you mentioned, he wasn't generous about sharing the credit for his achievements. There was also a lot of resentment, in Europe, that Byrd had beaten the Airship Norge, a European venture, to the Pole. Good points. It is known for certain that the Norge made it over the north pole and carried on to Alaska. Interestingly, Amundsen never claimed to have made it over the north pole prior to Byrd and always gave Byrd great credit. Amundsen could have stopped Byrd completely when Bennett and Byrd broke the skis on the Josephine Ford, but sent Balchen over to Byrd and Balchen showed them how to rebuild the skis by reinforcing them with lifeboat oars sliced lengthwise and then how to use a blowtorch rather than wax to prepare the surface. He also suggested they takeoff at night when the snow would not be sticky. A year ago The Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Mi., redid its aviation display (it's an amazing collection) and set up the Josephine Ford in a diorama with life size figures of Byrd, Bennett and Balchen to recreate the moment when Balchen approached the others about repairs to the skis. As to the North Pole flight, the pilot, Floyd Bennett admitted on his death bed that they had simply flown out of sight of Spitsbergen and made circles for 15 hours because of an oil leak on one engine. I find that extremely hard to believe, Rick. It contradicts everything else we (or I) know about Byrd. I do recall that Bennett crawled out of the cabin in mid-flight to deal with that oil leak, but I never heard of that death-bed confession. Just checked a couple of sources. I was mistaken. The flying around for 15 hours comment was made by a rival, not Bennett. Bennett, in the hospital in Canada, simply repeated to Balchen that he and Byrd had not gotten to the north pole. Bennett and Balchen flew the Josephine Ford all around the U.S. following the artic flight. Balchen was a test pilot for Fokker and kept extensive performance data on the Josephine Ford during the flights because he and Bennett intended to use it for a trans-Atlantic flight. It cruised on wheels (without skis mounted) at 70 knots TAS. (A nearly identical Fokker 3m, the Southern Cross, cruised at roughly the same speed, within 2 knots.) Balchen and Bennett confirmed the performance data and Bennett supposedly told Balchen that on skis the airplane cruised at 68 knots TAS. Balchen then asked Bennett how he and Byrd had made the round trip in the time they were gone. Bennett said that they hadn't and that it didn't matter anymore, apparently because the celebrations and awards had taken place. I have no trouble believing Byrd didn't reach the pole. His Sun Compass was excellent at providing directional information, but it provided no ground-speed info at all. As you mentioned, Bennett died of pneumonia in Jeffrey Hale Hospital in Quebec, Canada, the result of attempting, although he was already ill, a flight to rescue the crew of the Bremen, who had made a forced landing on Greenly Island in the Gulf of st. Lawrence. Given the circumstances of his death, and his heroic reputation, he was no doubt being hovered over by a staff of doctors and nurses, trying to keep him alive. Did they report such a confession at that time? The confession was made to Balchen, Bennett's best friend. The two of them had flown the Ford that was later named the Floyd Bennett to the Gulf to participate in the rescue (and to get publicity for raising funds for Byrd's Antarctic expedition.) Byrd's navigational markings on his charts were made on the steamship on the voyage home. How can we be certain of that? Crew member's reports, I believe it's in _Oceans, Poles and Airmen_. They did not match the weather data that was available for the flight (winds),.... I would imagine any data available for such a desolate, uninhabited part of the globe, in those days, was hardly reliable. I'm sure you know that even today, forecast winds are usually the most undependable part of any weather briefing. Agree, however, there were weather reporting stations in the Arctic and there is a historical record of the location of the highs and lows, thus the general wind direction is known (although I agree it's not perfectly accurate). There is a detailed report on the weather that was made after the fact when the National Geographic Society accepted Byrd's rather sparse data without challenge, which upset a number of folks who felt that Amundsen was first. At least one meteorologist published data on the subject and I believe one is reported in Montague's book, in an appendix. The History Channel program implied strongly that Byrd was the pilot on his flights. He never was. He never did any flying on his expeditions. Except for doing the flying while Bennett was out there dealing with the oil leak, that is probably true. But I don't think that is a criticism. Navigating that flight was a far greater challenge than Bennett's stick-and-rudder chores, although I'm not slighting what it takes to do them for 16 hours. Good points. In doing an article that included the Josephine Ford a while back, the museum let me "cross the ropes" and get in the airplane. I hadn't realized until then that it was open cockpit. Bennett and Byrd were truly men of iron. As I recall, in aviations early days, it was customary for the "captain" of an airplane not to do the flying, just as the captain of a naval vessel does not hold the wheel. (I don't think the Commander of NASA's space shots is the pilot, either.) To my knowledge, only on Pan Am flying boats did the "Master of Flying Boats" reach such an exhalted position that he no longer deigned to touch the controls. Gotta check on the shuttle, I'll email a friend who had four missions. No doubt that Byrd was the commander of the flights. It also implied that he was flying when the Fokker Trimotor he purchased for the Atlantic flight crashed. I didn't get that impression. IIRC, Anthony Fokker was flying it, wasn't he? (In any case, programs on the History Channel are loaded with mistakes, so such an error wouldn't be unusual. In fact, an error-free program would be much more unusual. You're right, Tony Fokker was flying. I felt that the program at least implied that Byrd was flying and it didn't make it clear that the accident was in no means the fault of the pilot. For reasons no one knows, Byrd refused to take off. His continual delays angered Fokker so much that he withdrew from the project and nearly took his airplane with him. I don't know, either, but I do seem to recall that Lindbergh had to wait around for the wx to improve. "Refusing to take off" is one of the smartest things a pilot can do. As you agreed, earlier, we can hardly attribute his delay to cowardice. Byrd was the first on the field (the Bellanca was going through all sorts of problems due to the crazy owner of the airplane) and both Fokker and Balchen wrote of frustration with Byrd not going when the weather was reported to be good and then, three weeks after Lindbergh went, abruptly decided to go when the weather forecast was awful, making the public comment that "modern airliners must be able to fly in all kinds of weather". Balchen was almost frantic after getting the same forecast for improving weather that Lindbergh got, because he was trying to get the crew together and launch but Byrd wouldn't go due to the "christening" ceremony that was to take place the next afternoon. Balchen and Acosta both wrote that Byrd provided no navigational assistance to them during the flight across the Atlantic. Is that in Balchen's _Come North With Me_? I see we have that here in the Penn State library. I can find nothing in the catalog by Acosta, though. Balchen wrote in either _Come North With Me_ or another book that he and Acosta had gotten the airplane above the clouds and were enjoying looking at the stars and wondering where they were when they got a note from Byrd saying that the overcast precluded star shots. For the South Pole trip there were four airplanes and four pilots taken to Little America.... When I was in the Marines, I had the pleasure of knowing two extraordinary men who had been selected to go to the South Pole with Byrd on Operation High Jump in 1946. One was M.Sgt. Mincey, a radio oerator in VMR 252; and another M.Sgt whose name escapes me in my senility; he was a navigator in VMR-153; both squadrons were in MAG 21, as was I. (In the Marines, at least in those days, navigators were enlisted men.) Regrettably, I have lost track of both in the ensuing half-century; I suspect both are dead by now. Both were older than I and would be pushing 90 by now. As I recall the navigator had developed some kind of grid-system for navigating in the polar regions, and was seriously injured in a crash. A mountain in Antarctica was named for him. Did you encounter anything about either of those men in any of your reading about Byrd? There is a web site on Byrd that gives the names of those who served with him in Antarctica (I found it on google by typing in: Byrd Balchen "South Pole" Don't recall if those names were there. You are correct that they use grid navigation. A friend of mine who flew helos in Antarctica as a civilian contractor for a couple of summers (I never figured out why an ex-Army helo pilot would go where it was so cold) once explained grid navigation to me, but her eyes were so captivating I'm afraid that I didn't pay as much attention to what she was saying as I should have. vince norris |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick, a retired USAF friend passes his copies of _Air Force_ magazine
on to me when he finishes them; the one he gave me yesterday, the November 2004 issue, has an article on Byrd and Balchen. I thought it might present some new evidence, but I found nothing startling in it. It did say that Byrd and Balchen had become "estranged" and that Bennett had told Balchen that he and Byrd had not reached the North Pole. Just checked a couple of sources....... The flying around for 15 hours comment was made by a rival, not Bennett. Since Byrd and Bennett were out of sight of any human being, and there was no radar in those days, no rival can know what they did. Sounds like "sour grapes." Seems to me that the possibility that Byrd never intended to fly to the Pole, that the whole expedition was a hoax, is just too wild to have any credibility. That leaves us with three possibilities: 1. Byrd intended to fly to the pole, but after the oil leak developed, he aborted the attempt and circled for 15 hours. 2. Byrd intended to fly to the pole, even after the the oil leak, but made some kind of error in dead reckoning, and failed to reach the Pole although he thought he had. Perhaps he recognized this at some point and "adjusted" the data. 3. Byrd reached the Pole. It seems to me that 2 is much more likely than 1; and 3, although questionable, cannot be ruled out entirely. It is virtually impossible to imagine that Byrd, an Annapolis-trained navigator, would have neglected to calculate, while planning the flight, an ETA at the Pole and an ETA back at Spitzbergen. Now, if he *knowingly* turned back before reaching the pole, wouldn't he have made certain he did not arrive back at Spitzbergen too early? It would have been pretty dumb not to do that, wouldn't it? He could have instructed Bennett to throttle back, or to circle. Consider that Bennett had no navigational gear in the cockpit. How in the world would he, Bennett, know they had not reached the Pole, unless Byrd had told him, either (a), explicitly, or (b) by tipping him off by requesting he circle or otherwise delay their arrival back at Spitzbergen? There is no way, just by looking out the windshield, that Bennett could know whether he is is, or is not, over the Pole. ......... there were weather reporting stations in the Arctic Sorry, Rick, I still remain stubbornly skeptical about wind reports. It's about 700 miles from Spitzbergen to the Pole, and it's all water or ice. Rarely if ever would the winds be the same over such a large area. I doubt very much there was a single weather reporting station anywhere along that route, or even near it, much less one capable of measuring winds at altitude. ...and there is a historical record of the location of the highs and lows,.... How could the locations of highs and lows over the polar region be known with any accuracy back in 1926, when no one was there, and meteorology was primitive compared to today? Perhaps I'm ignorant of the state of meteorology in those days, but I'm willing to be enlightened. To my knowledge, only on Pan Am flying boats did the "Master of Flying Boats" reach such an exalted position that he no longer deigned to touch the controls. I think it was common in military aviation. I recall reading that in WW I observation aircraft, the observer was typically an officer in command of the aircraft, and the pilot was an enlisted man who did what the observer told him. I believe that was also the practice in the U.S. Air Service. ... both Fokker and Balchen wrote of frustration with Byrd not going when the weather was reported to be good and then, three weeks after Lindbergh went, abruptly decided to go when the weather forecast was awful, making the public comment that "modern airliners must be able to fly in all kinds of weather". Now that raises an interesting question in my mind! Do you suppose Byrd was deliberately waiting for BAD weather, to prove that "modern airliners" can fly in all kinds of weather? There is a web site on Byrd that gives the names of those who served with him in Antarctica (I found it on google by typing in: Byrd Balchen "South Pole" After several ties, I've been unable to get that site. Could you possibly send the URL? A friend of mine....... once explained grid navigation to me, but her eyes were so captivating I'm afraid that I didn't pay as much attention to what she was saying as I should have. I don't blame you one damn bit. Could you get her to explain it to me sometime? vince norris |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vince,
Rick, a retired USAF friend passes his copies of _Air Force_ magazine on to me when he finishes them; the one he gave me yesterday, the November 2004 issue, has an article on Byrd and Balchen. I thought it might present some new evidence, but I found nothing startling in it. It did say that Byrd and Balchen had become "estranged" and that Bennett had told Balchen that he and Byrd had not reached the North Pole. What is amazing to me is that Byrd and Balchen are buried within several feet of each other at Arlington National Cemetery. Byrd attacked Balchen pretty viciously prior to the end of Byrd's life, apparently because Balchen had gotten publicity for his rescues in Greenland (including landing a PBY, gear up on the ice cap to pick up downed flight crew) and in Alaska. Balchen never publicly said anything negative about Bryd as a person, yet wsa the victim of some nasty smears by Byrd and then by Byrd's estate, which forced Balchen to delete the performance data on the Fokker 3m from his autobiograhy under threat of being suied by Byrd's estate (which had a lot more money than a retired Colonel could lay his hands on). Seems to me that the possibility that Byrd never intended to fly to the Pole, that the whole expedition was a hoax, is just too wild to have any credibility. That leaves us with three possibilities: 1. Byrd intended to fly to the pole, but after the oil leak developed, he aborted the attempt and circled for 15 hours. 2. Byrd intended to fly to the pole, even after the the oil leak, but made some kind of error in dead reckoning, and failed to reach the Pole although he thought he had. Perhaps he recognized this at some point and "adjusted" the data. 3. Byrd reached the Pole. It seems to me that 2 is much more likely than 1; and 3, although questionable, cannot be ruled out entirely. It is virtually impossible to imagine that Byrd, an Annapolis-trained navigator, would have neglected to calculate, while planning the flight, an ETA at the Pole and an ETA back at Spitzbergen. Now, if he *knowingly* turned back before reaching the pole, wouldn't he have made certain he did not arrive back at Spitzbergen too early? It would have been pretty dumb not to do that, wouldn't it? He could have instructed Bennett to throttle back, or to circle. Consider that Bennett had no navigational gear in the cockpit. How in the world would he, Bennett, know they had not reached the Pole, unless Byrd had told him, either (a), explicitly, or (b) by tipping him off by requesting he circle or otherwise delay their arrival back at Spitzbergen? There is no way, just by looking out the windshield, that Bennett could know whether he is is, or is not, over the Pole. I suspect Byrd turned back too early, possibly because of concern about the oil leak. ......... there were weather reporting stations in the Arctic Sorry, Rick, I still remain stubbornly skeptical about wind reports. It's about 700 miles from Spitzbergen to the Pole, and it's all water or ice. Rarely if ever would the winds be the same over such a large area. I doubt very much there was a single weather reporting station anywhere along that route, or even near it, much less one capable of measuring winds at altitude. ...and there is a historical record of the location of the highs and lows,.... Modern weather reporting and forecasting developed during World War I (which is why the use of the word "front" came about. It got sophisticated fairly rapidly with the ability to identify low and high pressure centers by the end of the war, based on widely scattered reporting stations. The next big bumps in weather technology came about during the space age. Without having it in front of me, the university that got involved in this issue had a meteorology professor publish the information that was available for the area at the time (remember there were reporting points all around the artic in the Soviet Union, Alaska, Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Spitsbergen, Norway, Finland, etc.). While the data isn't perfect by any means, there was nothing to show that there was enough instability in the area, with a fast moving front that would cause a strong tailwind for both portions of the trip, north and south. Had there been, the weather would probably also not have been VFR. (The weather forecasting was sophisticated enough to predict whether the weather would be VFR for the routes used both by Byrd and Amundsen.) I keep thinking the meteorologist report and speed calculations was included in Montague's book. He was a reporter who covered a lot of the long distance/exploration flights in the '20s and '30s and was one who was suspicious of Byrd's claims. ... both Fokker and Balchen wrote of frustration with Byrd not going when the weather was reported to be good and then, three weeks after Lindbergh went, abruptly decided to go when the weather forecast was awful, making the public comment that "modern airliners must be able to fly in all kinds of weather". Now that raises an interesting question in my mind! Do you suppose Byrd was deliberately waiting for BAD weather, to prove that "modern airliners" can fly in all kinds of weather? Doubtful, Byrd's repeated public pronouncements prior to Lindbergh taking off was that he was waiting for very good weather because safety was paramount. He kept saying that for a while after Lindbergh made it, but then made the "modern airliners" comment and launched when the forecasts were awful. No one writing about the flight has ever provided a theory for Byrd's behavior in delaying departure for so long and then abruptly going when he did. Interetingly, Byrd had had a hill built of dirt so the Fokker could start its takeoff roll with an assist. The tailskid was tied with a rope to allow Acosta (pilot flying for takeoff) to get full power before the airplane moved. The rope broke at about half throttle, yet Acosta managed to recover from the surprise and make a masterful takeoff of a horribly overloaded airplane. There is a web site on Byrd that gives the names of those who served with him in Antarctica (I found it on google by typing in: Byrd Balchen "South Pole" After several ties, I've been unable to get that site. Could you possibly send the URL? I've been looking again and haven't found it yet. I did find: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0020594/fullcredits that might be of assistance. I'll keep looking and if I can locate that site again, I'll post it. Ah, ha! Just found the one I wanted, from Congressional Gold Medal recipients, it's the one I referenced: http://www.congressionalgoldmedal.com/RichardEByrd.htm Hope that helps. All the best, Rick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is amazing to me is that Byrd and Balchen are buried within
several feet of each other at Arlington National Cemetery. Possibly arranged by some bureaucrat who was unaware of any animosity between the two, and thought it would be appropriate to bury them close to each other. Balchen ..... was the victim of some nasty smears by Byrd and then by Byrd's estate, which forced Balchen to delete the performance data on the Fokker 3m from his autobiograhy under threat of being suied by Byrd's estate (which had a lot more money than a retired Colonel could lay his hands on). I'm not a lawyer (I understand you are), but it's my impression one cannot libel dead person; thus Byrd's estate did not have a case. I suspect Byrd turned back too early, possibly because of concern about the oil leak. That is certainly a reasonable suspicion. Modern weather reporting and forecasting developed during World War I (which is why the use of the word "front" came about. Never heard that before! There is a web site on Byrd that gives the names of those who served with him in Antarctica (I found it on google by typing in: Byrd Balchen "South Pole" Ah, ha! Just found the one I wanted, from Congressional Gold Medal recipients, it's the one I referenced: http://www.congressionalgoldmedal.com/RichardEByrd.htm That's dated 1930, so it wouldn't have anything about later trips. But fortunately, an old friend of mine remembered the name of that navigator; it's Bob Spann. Googling, I found a site that lists Antarctic peaks: http://geonames.usgs.gov/stategaz/ANTARCTICA.TXT and there I found: Spann, Mount 00014312 8203S 04121W A mountain, 925 m, marking the N extremity of the Panzarini Hills and the Argentina Range, at the NE end of the Pensacola Mountains. Discovered and photographed on Jan. 13, 1956 in the course of a USN transcontinental nonstop plan flight from McMurdo Sound to Weddell Sea and return. Named by US-ACAN for Staff Sgt. Robert C. Spann, USMC, navigator of the P2V-2N Neptune aircraft during this flight. So he wasn't a M.Sgt, and I couldn't remember his name, but I got part of it right, anyway. vince norris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vince,
To follow up on a message I sent you about an hour ago. I sent an email to a friend (Jay Apt) who did four shuttle missions. In his reply he said that the commander of the shuttle sits in the left front seat and physcially flies the spacecraft on descent and landing. The "pilot" sits in the right seat and is effectively the copilot. (Sounds like an "interesting" way of naming the positions to me.) All the best, Rick |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To follow up on a message I sent you about an hour ago. I sent an
email to a friend (Jay Apt) who did four shuttle missions. In his reply he said that the commander of the shuttle sits in the left front seat and physcially flies the spacecraft on descent and landing. The "pilot" sits in the right seat and is effectively the copilot. (Sounds like an "interesting" way of naming the positions to me.) Another example of political correctness, no doubt. Airlines, as you know, typically call the copilot a "first officer." Derived from the nautical "first mate," I suppose. vince norris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
History Channel show update | Roger Long | Piloting | 0 | October 11th 04 05:06 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
History Channel | Rosspilot | Piloting | 6 | July 26th 03 03:02 AM |