![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
You don't live in the US and thus not subject to Federal income tax? If he doesn't, he's not eligible to win, anyway. Read the fine print... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thomas Borchert writes: You don't live in the US and thus not subject to Federal income tax? If he doesn't, he's not eligible to win, anyway. Read the fine print... Which fine print? According to http://www.aopa.org/sweeps/rules.html, non-Quebecois Canadians are eligible to win too. - FChE |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank,
"CAN I PARTICIPATE? AOPA’s 2004 Win-A-Twin Sweepstakes is open to all individuals who legally reside in the 50 United States, the District of Columbia and Canada (except the Province of Quebec) age 21 years or older as of the date of entry." It might surprise you, but that excludes a helluva lot of people ;-) -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert writes:
AOPA's 2004 Win-A-Twin Sweepstakes is open to all individuals who legally reside in the 50 United States, the District of Columbia and Canada (except the Province of Quebec) age 21 years or older as of the date of entry." Why the Quebec exclusion? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe that the Quebec provincial government will not allow any Quebec
resident to participate in a lottery or contest that is not endorsed or originates in said province! "Bob Fry" wrote in message ... Thomas Borchert writes: AOPA's 2004 Win-A-Twin Sweepstakes is open to all individuals who legally reside in the 50 United States, the District of Columbia and Canada (except the Province of Quebec) age 21 years or older as of the date of entry." Why the Quebec exclusion? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd have to sell it. I'm still working on finishing my private ticket.
To make the jump from a newly minted pilot to a twin rating is a very large leap. And I don't even want to think of what the insurance would be like, if I could even get it! Den dere's dem taxes.... Say...would that 5K of gas be on a card or something? maybe keep that! ![]() I'd buy me a bearhawk kit, or used certified single, like a 182 or something. As for future planes...yes, something simple would be nice. I'm sure they can find a high time basket case 172 or something that would produce good series of articles! Or why not just go and buy a new sport pilot plane?!? John |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John T wrote: Or why not just go and buy a new sport pilot plane?!? Then they wouldn't get a series of articles out of it. Reading about buying a new plane isn't exciting enough to justify even one article. George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |