![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that you know that separation is the pilots responsibility in
class D, but it seems that you still expect the tower controller to be responsible for it. Not exactly. What I find potentially dangerous is the fact that Class D ATC is putting on a show of actually controlling traffic, when, in fact, they are doing nothing of the sort. And then, when things fall apart, they can legally blame the pilots. This, IMHO, is a recipe for disaster. Take, for example, the poor schmuck in the pattern with us who was dangerously out of position. He apparently only heard the first part of the controller's instructions ("Fly toward the tower....") and missed the last part ("...and re-enter the right downwind.") Who knows what happened -- maybe the controller was walked on by another aircraft, or maybe the pilot himself walked on the second half of the instructions when he acknowledged them? (I heard the controller's whole transmission, so this is admittedly unlikely.) Either way, had the tower controller not been there, and thus no instructions issued, chances are this guy would have been just fine. He'd have proceeded into the pattern (or not) of his own volition -- and so would we all. When he misheard and then stupidly followed clearly erroneous instructions, we all ended up in a more precarious position. In the end, the attempt to control the landing pattern without adequate vision simply made the situation worse. Which, of course, begs the question: Could this situation have happened in Class C airspace? I think the answer is clearly "yes" -- but due to their radar it would never have gone so far without being caught and corrected. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When he misheard and then stupidly followed clearly erroneous
instructions, we all ended up in a more precarious position. So the error on the part of the pilot made things worse. No surprise here, that's what errors do. Which, of course, begs the question: Could this situation have happened in Class C airspace? I think the answer is clearly "yes" -- but due to their radar it would never have gone so far without being caught and corrected. Suppose the radar controller made a mistake? That would make things worse too, wouldn't it? And then the pilot would compound it by "stupidly following clearly erronieous instructions"... Toys in the cab and toys in the cockpit are no substitute for eyeballs (except in IMC) and reliance on toys puts us all in a more precarious position. The airspace is what it is. Jose -- Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
Negative XPDR - under the outer ring of Class C | bcjames | Piloting | 8 | August 30th 04 11:49 PM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Overlapping class C & D | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 14 | May 6th 04 04:08 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |